The Computer as Lab Partner: Classroom Experience Gleaned from One Year of Microcomputer-Based Laboratory Use

Abstract

Microcomputer-based labware (MBL) is an emergent class of technology which allows students to use the computer as a tool for collecting, displaying, analyzing, and storing data. The Computer as Lab Partner Project was designed to evaluate the use of MBL in junior high science. A model computer-equipped science lab was set up in a suburban middle school and a semester-length MBL curriculum was developed and evaluated with four eighth-grade physical science classes per semester. The classroom experience of using MBL is discussed: the features of the MBL system used and of the curriculum designed; classroom procedures, processes, and interactions observed; gains and benefits derived from MBL use; and areas of potential difficulty in MBL implementation.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Saettler

, A History of Instructional Technology, McGraw Hill, New York, 1968.

Rosen

S. A.

, History of the Physics Laboratory in the American Public Schools, American Journal of Physics, 22, pp. 129–204, 1954.

Shulman

L. S.

and Tamir

, Research on Teaching in the Natural Sciences, in Second Handbook of Research on Teaching, Travers

R. M. W.

(ed.), Rand McNally, Chicago, 1973.

Lesgold

A. M.

and Reif

, Chairmen's Report of a Research Conference, Computers in Education: Realizing the Potential, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, 1982.

Linn

M. C.

and Fisher

C. W.

, The Gap between Promise and Reality in Computer Education, ACCCEL Publication, Lawrence Hall of Science, University of California, Berkeley, 1985.

Stein

J. S.

and Linn

M. C.

, Computer as Lab Partner Project: A Summary of Major Objectives, Proposal to the Apple Foundation, 1985.

Davis

B. G.

and Stein

J. S.

, A Comparison of Videodisc to Traditional Laboratory, American Educational Research Journal, in press.

Driver

, The Pupil as Scientist?, Open University Press, Milton Keynes, 1983.

Reif

and St. John

, Teaching Physicists' Thinking Skills in the Laboratory, American Journal of Physics, 47, pp. 950–957, 1979.

10.

Chin

, “The Influence of Computer-Generated Advisements on Student Interactions with Computer-Assisted Instruction,” unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, 1985.

11.

Linn

M. C.

, Free-choice Experiences: How Do They Help Children Learn?, Science Education, 64, pp. 237–248, 1980.

12.

Stein

J. S.

and Linn

M. C.

, Capitalizing on Computer-based Interactive Feedback: An Investigation of Rocky's Boots, in Children and Microcomputers, Chen

and Paisley

(eds.), Sage, Beverly Hills, pp. 213–227, 1985.

13.

Karplus

, Strategies in Curriculum Development: The SCIS Project, in Strategies for Curriculum Development, Schaffarzick

and Hampson

D. H.

(eds.), McCutchan, Berkeley, 1975.

14.

Linn

M. C.

, Science Curriculum Design: Views from a Psychological Framework, in Psychology and Curriculum Design, Dillon

and Sternberg

(eds.), Academic Press, New York, in press.

15.

Stein

J. S.

and Nachmias

, Computer as Lab Partner: Students' Subject Matter Achievements, in preparation.

16.

Stein

J. S.

, “How Students Negotiate Understanding: Characterizing the Problem-solving Processes of Dyads During Microcomputer-based Science Labs,” doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, in preparation.

17.

Linn

M. C.

Layman

, and Nachmias

, Cognitive Consequences of Microcomputer-based Laboratories: Graphing Skills Development, Journal of Contemporary Educational Psychology, 1985.

18.

Nachmias

and Linn

M. C.

, Students' Perspectives on the Validity and Reliability of Computer-presented Data, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, in press.