This paper presents a procedure called multiple matrix sampling which simplifies data collection for drug incidence surveys. The technique has been used in achievement testing where the research interest was related to group and not individual differences as with the evaluation of statewide assessment plans. Advantages for the use of multiple matrix sampling with drug surveys are discussed and a practical example is outlined presenting the guidelines for a sampling plan.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
PascaleP. J., A Factor Analysis of a Drug Questionnaire, Journal of Drug Education, 3: 3, pp. 303308, 1973.
2.
CronbachL. J., Essentials of Psychological Testing, (3rd. Ed.), Harper & Row, New York, 1970.
3.
GoodeW. J.HattP. K., Methods in Social Research, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1952.
4.
SelltizC., Research Methods in Social Relations, Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York, 1959.
5.
RoeherG. A., Effective Techniques in Increasing Response to Mailed Questionnaires, Public Opinion Quarterly, 27, pp. 299302, 1963.
6.
LordF. M.NovickM. R., Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1968.
7.
ShoemakerD. M., Principles and Procedures of Multiple Matrix Sampling, Ballinger, Cambridge, Mass., 1973.
8.
BarcikowskiR. S., A Monte Carlo Study of Item Sampling (Versus Traditional Sampling) for Norm Construction, Journal of Educational Measurement, 9, pp. 209214, 1972.
9.
ShoemakerD. M., Standard Errors of Estimate in Item Examinee Sampling As a Function of Test Reliability, Variation in Item Difficulty Indices and Degree of Skewness in the Normative Distribution, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 32, pp. 705714, 1972.
10.
ChampionD. J.SearA. M.Questionnaire Response Rate: A Methodological Analysis, Social Forces, 47, pp. 335339, 1969.
11.
EchternachtG. J.Reliability and Validity of Questionnaire Items, Research Bulletin, RB-12, 1974.
12.
OppenheimA. N.Questionnaire Design and Attitude Measurement, Basic Books, New York, 1966.
13.
OwensT. R.StufflebeamD. L., An Experimental Comparison of Item Sampling and Examinee Sampling for Estimating Test Norms, Journal of Educational Measurement, 6, pp. 7583, 1969.
