A qualitative analysis of eighteen college students using different types of scaffolding (instructional supports) while working on a World Wide Web (WWW) project was conducted. Four different support mechanisms were examined: a) WWW resources; b) procedural guidelines for the instructional activity; c) student-student interactions; and d) instructor-student interactions. Three major findings related to use of the WWW as a resource-based learning environment are discussed: a) the utility of scaffolds and WWW resources seem dependent on the ability of learners to readily grasp how the scaffold or resource could help them; b) learners' preconceptions and search strategies were difficult to alter, despite ongoing evidence that searching was not leading to project clarification; and c) social scaffolding based on face to face dialogue with instructors and peers was critical to helping learners manage the complexity of the open-ended project. Implications related to the role of instructional scaffolding in encouraging shared meaning and learning with WWW resources are considered.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BrownA. L., Design Experiments: Theoretical and Methodological Challenges in Creating Complex Interventions in Classroom Settings, The Journal of Learning Sciences, 2, pp. 141–178, 1992.
2.
Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt, Some Thoughts about Constructivism and Instructional Design, in Contructivism and the Technology of Instruction, DuffyT. M. and JonassenD. H. (eds.), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey, pp. 115–119, 1992.
3.
FettermanD. M., Webs of Meaning: Computer and Internet Resources for Educational Research and Instruction, Educational Researcher, 27: 3, pp. 22–30, 1998.
4.
OwstonR. D., The World Wide Web: A Technology To Enhance Teaching And Learning?Educational Researcher, 26: 2, pp. 27–33, 1997.
5.
TrentinG., What does “Using the Internet for Education” Mean?Educational Technology, 39: 4, pp. 15–23, 1999.
6.
RakesG. C., Using the Internet as a Tool in a Resource-Based Learning, Environment, Educational Technology, 36: 5, pp. 52–56, 1996.
7.
MooreP., Information Problem Solving: A Wider View of Library Skills, Contemporary Eductional Psychology, 20, pp. 1–31, 1995.
8.
AlexanderP. A.MurphyP. K.WoodsB. S.DunhonK. E., and ParkerD., College Instruction and Conceptual Changes in Students' Knowledge, Interest, and Strategy Use: A Study of Domain Learning, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22, pp. 125–146, 1997.
9.
WindschiltM., The WWW and Classroom Research: What Path Should be Taken?Educational Researcher, 27: 1, pp. 28–33, 1998.
10.
RoschelleJ. and PeaR., Trajectories From Today's WWW To A Powerful Educational Infrastructure, Educational Researcher, 28: 5, pp. 22–25, 1999.
11.
MilheimW. D. and HarveyD. M., Design and Development of World Wide Web Resource Site, Educational Technology, 38: 1, pp. 53–56, 1998.
12.
HillJ. R. and HannafinM. J., Cognitive Strategies and Learning from the World Wide Web, Educational Technology Research and Development, 45: 4, pp. 37–64, 1997.
13.
LandS. M. and GreeneB. A., Project-Based Learning with the World Wide Web: A Qualitative Study of Resource Integration, Educational Technology Research and Development, 48: 1, pp. 45–66, 2000.
14.
BrownA. L.KaneM. J., and EcholsC. H., Young Children's Mental Models Determine Analogical Transfer across with a Common Goal Structure, Cognitive Development, 1, pp. 103–121, 1986.
15.
ButlerD., In Search of the Architect of Learning: A Commentary on Scaffolding as a Metaphor for Instructional Interactions, Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31: 4 pp. 374–385, 1998.
16.
PalinscarA. S., The Role of Dialogue in Providing Scaffolded Instruction, Educational Psychologist, 21: 1 and 2, pp. 73–98, 1986.
17.
PalinscarA. S. and BrownA. L., Reciprocal Teaching of Comprehension Fostering and Comprehension-Monitoring Activities, Cognition and Instruction, 2, pp. 117–175, 1984.
18.
RosenshineB. and MeisterC., The Use of Scaffolds for Teaching Higher-Level Cognitive Strategies, Educational Leadership, 4, pp. 26–33, 1992.
19.
VygotskyL. S., Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes, in ColeM.John-SteinerV.SchribnerS., and SoubermanE. (eds. and trans.), MIT Press, Cabmbridge, Massachusetts, 1978.
20.
SalomonG.GlobersonT., and GutermanE., The Computer as a Zone of Proximal Development: Internalizing Reading-related Matacognitions from a Reading Partner, Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, pp. 620–627, 1989.
21.
LajoieS., Computer Environments as Cognitive Tools for Enhancing Learning, in Computers as Cognitive Tools, LajoieS. P. and DerryS. J. (eds.), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey, pp. 261–288, 1993.
22.
RosenshineB. and MeisterC., Reciprocal Teaching: A Review of the Research, Review of Educational Research, 64, pp. 479–530, 1994.
23.
PeaR. D., Practices of Distributed Intelligence and Designs for Education, in Distributed Intelligence, Salomon'sG. (ed.), Cambridge, New York, pp. 47–87, 1993.
24.
ScardamaliaM. and BereiterC., Computer Support for Knowledge-Building Communities, The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3: 3, pp. 265–283, 1984.
25.
BrownJ. S.CollinsA., and DuguidP., Situated Cognition of Learning, Educational Researcher, 18, pp. 32–42, 1988.
26.
RoschelleJ., Learning by Collaborating: Convergent Conceptual Change, The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2: 3 pp. 235–276, 1992.
27.
PeaR. D., Seeing What We Build Together: Distributed Multimedia Learning Environemts for Transformative Communications, The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3: 3 pp. 285–299, 1994.
28.
GuzdialM., Information Ecology of Collaborations in Educational Settings: Influence of Tool, in HallR.MiyakeN., and EnyedyN. (eds.), Proceedings from the National Convention of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL), Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 1997.
29.
LajoieS. and DerryS. (eds.), Computers as Cognitive Tools, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey, 1993.
30.
SolomonG., On the Nature of Pedagogic Computer Tools: The Case of the Writing Partner, in LajoieS. P. and DerryS. J. (eds.), Computers as Cognitive Tools, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey, pp. 179–196, 1993.
31.
ScardamaliaM.BereiterC.McLeanR.SwallowJ., and WoodruffE., Computer-Supported Intentional Learning Environments, Journal of Eductional Computing Research, 5: 1, pp. 51–68, 1989.
32.
McKayM., A Comparison of the Effects of Procedural and Metacognition Instruction on the Transfer of Computer Software Skills, unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Oklahoma, 1999.
33.
PalinscarA. S., Keeping the Metaphor of Scaffolding Fresh—A Response to C. Addisone Stone's “The Metaphor of Scaffolding: Its Utility for the Field of Learning Disabilities,”Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31: 4 pp. 370–373, 1998.
34.
HannafinM. J.HallC.LandS., and HillJ., Learning in an Open-Ended Learning Environment: Assumptions, Methods, and Implications, Educational Technology, 34: 8, pp. 48–55, 1994.
35.
PerkinsD. N., Technology Meets Constructivism: Do They Make a Marriage?Educational Technology, 31: 5, pp. 18–23, 1991.
36.
MilesM. B. and HubermanA. M., Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (2nd ed.), Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, California, 1994.
37.
YinR., Case Study Research (2nd Edition), Sage Publications, Newbury Park, California, 1994.
38.
GubaE. G. and LincolnY., Epistemologial and Methodological Bases of Naturalistic Inquiry, ECTJ, 30: 4, 233–252, 1982.
39.
EricssonK. A. and SimonH. A., Protocol Analysis: Verbal reports as Data (2nd Edition), The MIT Press, Cambridge, 1993.
40.
RothW. M.Affordances of Computers in Teacher-Student Interactions: The Case of Interactive Physics™, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32: 4, pp. 329–347, 1995.
41.
StakeR. E., The Art of Case Study Research, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, California, 1995.
42.
HannafinM.LandS., and OliverK., Open Learning Environments: Foundations, Methods, and Models, in Instructional Design Theories and Models (Vol. II), Reigeluth'sC. (ed.), Erlbaum, Mahway, New Jersey, 1999.
43.
StrikeK. and PosnerG.RevisionistA.Theory of Conceptual Change, in Philosophy of Science, Cognitive Psychology, and Educational Theory and Practice, DuschlR. and HamiltonR. (eds.), pp. 147–176, 1992.
44.
PintrichP.MarxR., and BoyleR., Beyond Cold Conceptual Change: The Role of Motivational Beliefs and Classroom Contextual Factors in the Process of Conceptual Change, Review of Educational Research, 63: 2, pp. 167–199, 1993.
