Subjective experiences of individuals who walked on hot coals during a firewalking ceremony were investigated. This study extended and partially supported an investigation reported by Pekala and Ersek in this Journal [1]. Twenty-three participants completed retrospective questionnaire assessments concerning their subjective experiences while walking on hot coals. Results from twelve participants were compared with the participants' own experiences during a baseline condition. The data suggested that attention during firewalking is significantly more “one-pointed” than during a baseline condition, and that consciousness may be characterized as more “hypnoidal” than during a baseline condition. Walking on hot coals was further characterized by trends toward reporting increased altered awareness, altered experience, and absorbed attention. Participants who developed a greater degree of blistering reported significantly greater hypnoidal effects during the firewalk than those who developed a lesser degree of blistering.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
PekalaR. J.ErsekB., Firewalking versus Hypnosis: A Preliminary Study Concerning Consciousness, Attention, and Fire Immunity, Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 12, pp. 207–229, 1992–93.
2.
MurphyM., The Future of the Body: Explorations Into the Further Evolution of Human Nature, J. P. Tarcher, Inc., Los Angeles, 1992.
3.
CoeM. R., Firewalking and Related Behaviors, The Psychological Record, 7:2, pp. 101–110, 1957.
4.
WalkerJ., The Amateur Scientist: Drops of Water Done on a Hot Skillet and the Experimenter Walks on Hot Coals, Scientific American, 237, pp. 126–131, 1977.
5.
DohertyJ., Hot Feat: Firewalkers of the World, Science Digest, 66, pp. 67–71, 1982.
6.
VilenskayaL., Firewalking: A New Fad, a Scientific Riddle, or an Excellent Tool for Healing, Spiritual Growth, and Psychological Development?Psi Research, 3:2, pp. 102–118, 1984.
7.
BlakeJ., Attribution of Power and the Transformation of Fear: An Empirical Study of Firewalking, Psi Research, 4, pp. 62–88, 1985.
8.
GaddisV. H., Mysterious Fires and Lights, David McKay, New York, 1967.
9.
GuileyR. E., Harper's Encyclopedia of Mysticism and Paranormal Experience, Harper Collins, New York, 1991.
10.
ManganasV., Fire Dancing in Greece, Psi Research, 2:4, pp. 80–83, 1984.
11.
PekalaR. J.NaglerR., The Assessment of Hypnoidal States: Rationale and Clinical Application, American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 31, pp. 231–236, 1989.
12.
RobbinsA., Unlimited Power, Fawcett Columbine, New York, 1986.
13.
RobbinsA., Awaken the Giant Within, Simon & Schuster, New York, 1991.
14.
PekalaR. J., Dimensions of Attention Questionnaire (DAQ), Mid-Atlantic Educational Institute, West Chester, Pennsylvania, 1991.
15.
PekalaR. J., Phenomenology of Consciousness Inventory (PCI), Mid-Atlantic Educational Institute, West Chester, Pennsylvania, 1991.
16.
PekalaR. J., Quantifying Consciousness: An Empirical Approach, Plenum Press, New York, 1991.
17.
PekalaR. J.ForbesE., Subjective Effects Associated with Several Stress Management Strategies: With Reference to Attention, Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 16, pp. 39–44, 1990.
18.
PekalaR. J.KumarV. K., Phenomenological Variations in Attention Across Low, Medium, and High Hypnotically Susceptible Individuals, Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 7, pp. 303–314, 1988.
19.
TellegenA.AtkinsonC., Openness to Absorbing and Self-Altering Experiences (“Absorption”), A Trait Related to Hypnotic Susceptibility, Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 83, pp. 268–277, 1974.
20.
PekalaR. J.LevineR. L., Quantifying States of Consciousness via an Empirical-Phenomenological Approach, Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 2, pp. 51–71, 1982.
21.
PekalaR. J.WengerC. F., Retrospective Phenomenological Assessment: Mapping Consciousness in Reference to Specific Stimulus Conditions, Journal of Mind and Behavior, 4, pp. 247–274, 1983.
22.
KumarV. K.PekalaR. J., Hypnotizability, Absorption, and Individual Differences in Phenomenological Experience, International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 36, pp. 80–88, 1988.
23.
PekalaR. J.LevineR. L., Mapping Consciousness: Development of an Empirical-Phenomenological Approach, Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 1, pp. 29–47, 1981.
24.
PekalaR. J.KumarV. K., Predicting Hypnotic Susceptibility by a Self-Report Phenomenological State Instrument, American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 27, pp. 114–121, 1984.
25.
PekalaR. J.KumarV. K., Predicting Hypnotic Susceptibility via a Self-Report Instrument: A Replication, American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 30, pp. 57–65, 1987.
26.
PekalaR. J.SteinbergJ.KumarV. K., Measurement of Phenomenological Experience: Phenomenology of Consciousness Inventory, Perceptual and Motor Skills, 63, pp. 983–989, 1986.
27.
PekalaR. J.WengerC. F.LevineR. L., Individual Differences in Phenomenological Experience: States of Consciousness as a Function of Absorption, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, pp. 125–132, 1985.
28.
KumarV. K.PekalaR. J., Variations in Phenomenological Experience as a Function of Hypnosis and Hypnotic Susceptibility: A Replication, British Journal of Experimental and Clinical Hypnosis, 6, pp. 17–22, 1989.
29.
BrownD. P.FrommE., Hypnotherapy and Hypnoanalysis, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey, 1986.
30.
EricksonM. H.RossiE. L., The Nature of Hypnosis and Suggestion, Vol. I, Irvington Publishers, New York, 1980.
31.
ShorR. E.OrneE. C., The Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, California, 1962.
32.
CohenJ., Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey, 1988.
33.
WickramasekeraI. E., Somatization: Concepts, Data, and Predictions from the High Risk Model of Threat Perception, Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease, 183:1, pp. 15–23, 1995.
