This article reviews the recent literature on mass media campaigns and communication approaches promoting drug abuse prevention aimed at four target audiences: youth, parents, women, and the elderly. Media effectiveness, including advantages and disadvantages of each medium according to target audience, is discussed. Of the four target groups, the youth audience is the one most heavily studied by researchers and communicators. Parents, a relatively new advocacy group, can be viewed as targets and as intermediaries, although little research on either role has been documented. Women have been the targets of awareness campaigns, generally on the effects of tranquilizing drugs, while the elderly have been addressed on the topic of appropriate licit drug use. The importance of audience analysis, of segmenting audiences into subgroups, and of designing customized presentations has been cited as critical across all target populations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ResnikH. S., It Starts with People: Experiences in Drug Abuse Prevention, National Institute on Drug Abuse, 1978.
2.
HuT. and MitchellM. E., Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation of the 1978 NIDA Drug Abuse Prevention Television Campaign, Draft final report, Grant No. E07 DA 02464-01, prepared for National Institute on Drug Abuse, Pennsylvania State University, Center for Research on Human Resources, June 1981.
3.
NIDA Prevention Campaign in Limbo, New York State Prevention Pursuits, 1: 2, p. 1, May-July 1979.
4.
Second Annual Report from the Secretary of the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare to the President and Congress of the United States: Drug Abuse Prevention, Treatment, and Rehabilitation, the Extent and Health Consequences of Drug Abuse the HEW Response, Fiscal Year 1979
5.
HannemanG. J. and McEwenW. J., Televised Drug Abuse Appeals: A Content Analysis, Journalism Quarterly, 50: 2, pp. 329–333, 1973.
6.
SchlegelR. P., The Role of Persuasive Communications in Drug Dissuasion, Journal of Drug Education, 7: 3, pp. 279–289, 1977.
7.
DemboR., A Survey of Students' Awareness of and Attitudes Toward Drug Abuse Prevention Programs in New York State, Winter 1974/75, International Journal of the Addictions, 14: 3, pp. 311–328, 1979.
8.
KlineJ. A., Evaluation of a Multimedia Drug Education Program, Journal of Drug Education, 2: 3, pp. 229–239, 1972.
9.
FejerD., Sources of Information About Drugs Among High School Students, Public Opinion Quarterly, 35, pp. 235–241, 1971.
10.
DemboR., The Believability of the Media as Sources of Information on Drugs, International Journal of the Addictions, 12: 7, pp. 959–969, 1977.
11.
SmartR. G. and FejerD., Credibility of Sources of Drug Information for High School Students, Journal of Drug Issues, 2, pp. 8–18, 1972.
12.
FeingoldP. C. and KnappM. L., Anti-Drug Abuse Commercials, Journal of Communication, 27: 1, pp. 20–28, 1977.
13.
SheppardM. A., Sources of Information About Drugs, Journal of Drug Education, 10: 3, pp. 257–262, 1980.
14.
BarcusF. E., Over-the-Counter and Proprietary Drug Advertising on Television, in Communication Research and Drug Education, OstmanR. (ed.), Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, California, pp. 89–111, 1976.
15.
MilavskyR.BertonP., and StippH., TV Drug Advertising and Proprietary and Illicit Drug Use Among Teenage Boys, Public Opinion Quarterly, 39, pp. 457–481, 1975.
16.
AtkinC. K., Effects of Drug Commercials on Young Viewers, Journal of Communication, 28, pp. 48–56, 1978.
17.
PayneD. E., The Relationship Between Television Advertising and Drug Abuse Among Youth: Fancy and Fact, Journal of Drug Education, 6: 3, pp. 215–219, 1976.
18.
KohnP. M. and SnookS., Balanced vs. One-Sided Communications About Drugs, Journal of Drug Education, 6: 4, pp. 273–281, 1976.
19.
Spotlighting Meetings: Agendas for the 1980's, Prevention Resources, IV: 4, pp. 1–11, 1980.
20.
Celebrating: Parent Power in Georgia, Prevention Resources, II: 3–4, pp. 1–8, 1978.
21.
DupontR. L., The Future of Primary Prevention: Parent Power, Journal of Drug Education, 10: 1, pp. 1–5, 1980.
22.
Parent's Movement for Drug-Free Youth: Based on Belief in Positive Parent Power, PTA Today, 7: 1, p. 20, May 1981.
23.
Updating Prevention, Prevention Resources, IV: 3, pp. 1–7, 1980.
24.
ManattM., Parents, Peers, and Pot, National Institute on Drug Abuse, DHHS Pub. No. (ADM) 81-812, 1979, Reprinted 1981.
25.
Conversation with Thomas J. Gleaton, Ed.D., Director, PRIDE (Parent Resources Institute for Drug Education), November 1981.
26.
WotringC. E., Attacking the Drug Norm: Effects of the 1976–1977 Florida Drug Abuse TV Campaign, Journal of Drug Education, 9: 3, pp. 255–261, 1979.
27.
National Institute on Drug Abuse, The State of the Art of Bicultural Women and Substance Abuse Prevention, by the Center for Multicultural Awareness, draft, 1981.
28.
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, The Public and High Blood Pressure: Six-Year Follow-up Survey of Public Knowledge and Reported Behavior, Urban Behavioral Research Associates and Louis Harris and Associates, Inc., NIH Pub. No. 81-2118, September 1981.
29.
WotringC. E. and SchmelingD., Mood Altering Drug Abuse: The Perceptions of Middle-Aged Women Concerning the Use and Abuse of Prescription Drugs, Journal of Drug Education, 7: 2, pp. 123–131, 1977.
30.
SchmelingD. G. and WotringC. E., Agenda-Setting Effects of Drug Abuse Public Service Ads, Journalism Quarterly, 53, pp. 743–746, 1976.
31.
HannemanG. J., The Medicine Man Message: A Delayed Effects Evaluation of a California State Office of Narcotics and Drug Abuse Prevention Campaign to Inform the Public of the Dangers of Prescription and Over-the-Counter Drug Misuse, Vol. III, Methods and Results, Contract No. AGR-NDA-28291, University of Southern California, Center for Communications Policy Research, Los Angeles, 1978.
32.
HannemanG. J., The Medicine Man Message: An Evaluation of a California State Office of Narcotics and Drug Abuse Prevention Campaign to Inform the Public of the Dangers of Prescription and Over-the-Counter
33.
Drug Misuse, Executive Summary, Contract No. AGR-NDA-28291, University of Southern California, Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, Los Angeles, 1977.
34.
SandmaierM., Myths and Messages: Using the Media as a Prevention Tool, in The Woman Next Door: Summary Proceedings of a Symposium on the Subject of Drugs and the Modern Woman, D'AmandaC. and KorcokM. (eds.), U. S. Journal of Drug and Alcohol Dependence, Hollywood, Florida, 1980.
35.
PlantJ., Educating the Elderly in Safe Medication Use, Hospitals, 51: 8, pp. 97–102, 1977.
36.
BasenM. M., The Elderly and Drugs: Problem Overview and Program Strategy, Public Health Reports, 92: 1, pp. 43–48, 1977.
37.
IslerC., Teaching the Elderly to Avoid Accidental Drug Abuse, RN, 40: 11, pp. 39–42, 1977.
38.
BlaneH. T. and HewittL., Mass Media, Public Education and Alcohol: A State-of-the-Art Review, prepared for the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, Purchase Order NIA-76-12, 1977.
39.
SalzerJ. E.MarshallC. L., and GlazerE. R., The Use of Cable Television as a Tool in Health Education of the Elderly: Screening, Health Education Monographs, 5: 4, pp. 363–378, 1977.
40.
GombeskiW. R., Health Information Sources of the Poorly Informed: Implications for Health Educators and Communicators, Health Values: Achieving High Levels Wellness, 5: 5, pp. 199–206, 1981.
41.
Elder Ed: A Model Education Program, Prevention of Medication Misuse for the Elderly, National Institute on Drug Abuse, 1981.
42.
LohrL., Drug Misuse in the Elderly: Those Hurt Most are Least Able to Prevent It, American Pharmacy, NS18: 7, p. 360, 1978.
43.
Educational and Service Programs of National Retired Teachers Association and American Association of Retired Persons, 1980.
44.
Office of Substance Abuse Services, The Underside of Over-the-Counter Drugs: Slide Show Narrative, Department of Public Health, State of Michigan Michigan, Lansing, Michigan, 1980.
45.
Peoples Drug Stores to Distribute Free NIA Aging Brochures to the Elderly, NIH Record, 33: 22, p. 27, October 27, 1982.
46.
National Institute on Aging, Living with Aging: Safe Use of Medicines by Older People, Peoples Drug Stores, Inc., 1981.
47.
Roche Medication Education, Roche Laboratories, Division of Hoffmann, Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc., Nutley, New Jersey, 1978.
48.
Conversation with Ann Bidenweg, Scientific and Public Information Manager, Roche Laboratories, Division of Hoffmann-La Roche, March 1982.
49.
LevyM. R. and GlanzK., Drug Misuse Among the Elderly: An Educational Challenge for Health Professionals, Journal of Drug Education, 11: 1, pp. 61–75, 1981.
50.
AtkinC. K., Research Evidence on Mass Mediated Health Communication Campaigns, in Communication Yearbook 3, NimmoD. (ed.), Transaction International Communication Association, New Brunswick, New Jersey, pp. 655–668, 1979.
51.
FlayB. R.DiTeccoD., and SchlegelR. P., Mass Media in Health Promotion: An Analysis Using an Extended Information-Processing Model, Health Education Quarterly, 7: 2, pp. 127–147, 1980.
52.
RobertsonT. S. and WortzelL. H., Consumer Behavior and Health Care Change: The Role of Mass Media, Advances in Consumer Research, 4, pp. 525–527, 1977.
53.
WallackL. M., Assessing Effects of Mass Media Campaigns: An Alternative Perspective, Alcohol Health and Research World, V: 1, pp. 17–29, 1980.
54.
WallackL. M., Mass Media and Drinking, Smoking, and Drug Taking, Contemporary Drug Problems, 9: 1, pp. 49–83, 1980.
55.
HannemanG. J., The Media, The Public, and Health Information, Testimony prepared for the Select Committee on Narcotics Abuse and Control, U. S. House of Representatives, April 20, 1978.
