The U.S. Department of Agriculture's 1991 withdrawal of its Eating Right Pyramid food guide in response to pressure from meat and dairy producers was only the latest in a long series of industry attempts to influence federal dietary recommendations. Such attempts began when diet-related health problems in the United States shifted in prevalence from nutrient deficiencies to chronic diseases, and dietary advice shifted from “eat more” to “eat less.” The Pyramid controversy focuses attention on the conflict between federal protection of the rights of food lobbyists to act in their own self-interest, and federal responsibility to promote the nutritional health of the public. Since 1977, for example, under pressure from meat producers, federal dietary advice has evolved from “decrease consumption of meat” to “have two or three (daily) servings.” Thus, this recent incident also highlights the inherent conflict of interest in the Department of Agriculture's dual mandates to promote U.S. agricultural products and to advise the public about healthy food choices.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BurrosM.U.S. delays issuing nutrition chart. New York Times, April 27, 1991, p. A9.
2.
CombsG. F.What's happening at USDA. AIN Nutr. Notes27(3): 6, 1991.
3.
SugarmanC.GladwellM.Revised food chart killed. Washington Post, April 17, 1991, pp. Al, A7.
4.
SugarmanC.The $855,000 pyramid. Washington Post, April 28, 1992, pp. Al, A4.
5.
Department of Agriculture Organic Act, 12 Stat 317, May 15, 1862.
6.
HuntC. L.AtwaterH. W.How to Select Foods. I: What the Body Needs. Farmers' Bulletin 808, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C., 1917.
7.
HuntC. L.Good Proportions in the Diet. Farmers' Bulletin No. 1313. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C., 1923.
8.
Human Nutrition Information Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. Nutrient Content of the U.S. Food Supply. Administrative Report 299-21. Washington, D.C., 1988.
9.
National Research Council. Recommended Dietary Allowances, Ed. 10. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 1989.
10.
LevensteinH.Revolution at the Table: The Transformation of the American Diet. Oxford University Press, New York, 1988.
11.
HaughtonB.An historical study of the underlying assumptions for United States food guides from 1917 through the basic four food group guide. J. Nutr. Educ.19: 169–175, 1987.
12.
NestleM.PorterD. V.Evolution of federal dietary guidance policy: From food adequacy to chronic disease prevention. Caduceus6(2): 43–67, 1990.
13.
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Food for Fitness: A Daily Food Guide. Leaflet No. 424. Washington, D.C., 1958.
14.
HillM. M.ClevelandL. E.Food guides—their development and use. USDA Nutr. Program News, July-October 1970, p. 3.
15.
National Dairy Council. A Guide to Good Eating. Chicago, 1958.
16.
PageI. H.Atherosclerosis and the fat content of the diet. Circulation16: 163–178, 1957.
17.
American Heart Association. Dietary fat and its relation to heart attacks and strokes. Circulation23: 133–136, 1961.
18.
Inter-Society Commission for Heart Disease Resources. Primary prevention of the atherosclerotic diseases. Circulation42: A55–A98, 1970.
19.
U.S. House of Representatives. Rural Development, Agriculture, and Related Agencies Appropriation Bill, 1989. Report No. 100-690, p. 107. Washington, D.C., June 10, 1988.
20.
TimmerC. P.NesheimM. C.Nutrition, product quality, and safety. In Consensus and Conflict in U.S. Agriculture, edited by GardnerB. L.RichardsonJ. W., pp. 155–192. Texas A & M University Press, College Station, 1979.
21.
RaperN.Nutrient content of the U.S. food supply. FoodReview14(3): 13–17, 1991.
22.
U.S. Senate Select Committee on Nutrition and Human Needs. Dietary Goals for the United States—Supplemental Views. Washington, D.C., November 1977.
MilbrathL. W.The Washington Lobbyists. Rand McNally, Chicago, 1963.
25.
Congressional Quarterly Service. Legislators and the Lobbyists, Ed. 2. Washington, D.C., 1968.
26.
Congressional Quarterly Service. Legislators and the Lobbyists. Washington, D.C., 1965.
27.
U.S. Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs. The Federal Lobbying Disclosure Laws. Hearings before the Subcommittee on Oversight of Government Management, S-Hrg. 102–377. Washington, D.C., June 20, July 16, September 25, 1991.
28.
Registered lobbyists. Congress Rec. 37(122): HL 287–372, August 15, 1991.
29.
PaarlbergD.American Farm Policy: A Case Study of Centralized Decision-making. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1964.
30.
MorganD.Trying to lead the USDA through a thicket of politics. Washington Post, July 5, 1978, p. Al.
31.
MorganD.‘Plain, poor sister’ is newly alluring. Washington Post, July 4, 1978, pp. Al, A8.
32.
BrowneW. P.Private Interests, Public Policy, and American Agriculture. University Press of Kansas, Lawrence, 1988.
33.
GuitherH. D.The Food Lobbyists: Behind the Scenes of Food and Agri-politics. Lexington Books, Lexington, Mass., 1980.
34.
U.S. Senate Select Committee on Nutrition and Human Needs. Final Report. Washington, D.C., December -1977.
35.
U.S. Senate Select Committee on Nutrition and Human Needs. Dietary Goals for the United States. Washington, D.C., February 1977.
36.
Senate Select Committee on Nutrition and Human Needs. Diet Related to Killer Diseases, III. Hearings in Response to Dietary Goals for the United States: Re Meat, p. 42. Washington, D.C., March 24, 1977.
37.
MotternN.Dietary goals. Food Monitor, March/April 1978, p. 9.
38.
U.S. Senate Select Committee on Nutrition and Human Needs. Dietary Goals for the United States, Ed. 2, p. 4. Washington, D.C., December 1977.
39.
HadwigerD. G.BrowneW. P. (eds.). The New Politics of Food. Lexington Books, Lexington, Mass., 1988.
40.
U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. Healthy People: The Surgeon General's Report on Health Promotion and Disease Prevention. DHEW(PHS) 79-55071. Washington, D.C., 1979.
41.
MonteT.The U.S. finally takes a stand on diet. Nutr. Action6(9): 4, 1979.
PeterkinB. B.Diets that meet the dietary goals. J. Nutr. Educ.10: 15–18, 1978.
44.
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Food: The Hassle-free Guide to a Better Diet, p. 18. Home and Garden Bulletin No. 228. Washington, D.C., 1979.
45.
ForemanC. T.Personal communication.
46.
ADA may publish expurgated version of “Food Two” magazine. CNI Weekly Rep. 12(17): 1–2, 1982.
47.
ADA to publish Food II magazine as separate booklets. CNI Weekly Rep. 12(33): 1–2, 1982.
48.
U.S. Department of Agriculture and U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. Nutrition and Your Health: Dietary Guidelines for Americans. Home and Garden Bulletin No. 232. Washington, D.C., 1980.
49.
BroadW. J.Nutrition research: End of an empire. Science213: 518–520, 1981.
50.
MaughT. H.Cancer is not inevitable. Science217: 36–37, 1982.
51.
USDA readies to carve up the dietary guidelines. Nutr. Action10(2): 3–4, 1983.
52.
U.S. Department of Agriculture and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Nutrition and Your Health: Dietary Guidelines for Americans, Ed. 2. Home and Garden Bulletin No. 232. Washington, D.C., 1985.
53.
Reagan administration OK's dietary guidelines. CNI Weekly Rep., September 26, 1985, p. 2.
54.
National Research Council. Designing Foods: Animal Product Options in the Marketplace. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 1988.
55.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The Surgeon General's Report on Nutrition and Health. DHHS (PHS) Publ. No. 88-502010. Washington, D.C., 1988.
56.
National Research Council. Diet and Health: Implications for Reducing Chronic Disease Risk. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 1989.
57.
McGinnisJ. M.NestleM.The surgeon general's report on nutrition and health: Policy implications and implementation strategies. Am. J. Clin. Nutr.49: 23–28, 1989.
58.
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Report of the Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee on the Dietary Guidelines for Americans. No. 261-463/20444. Washington, D.C., 1990.
59.
U.S. Department of Agriculture and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Nutrition and Your Health: Dietary Guidelines for Americans, Ed. 3. Home and Garden Bulletin No. 232. Washington, D.C., 1990.
60.
CroninF. J.Developing a food guidance system to implement the dietary guidelines.7. Nutr. Educ.19: 281–302, 1987.
61.
ZuckermanS.Killing it softly. Nutr. Action, January/February 1984, pp. 6–10.
62.
WelshS.DavisC.ShawA.Development of the food guide pyramid. Nutr. Today27: 12–23, November/December 1992.
63.
A pyramid topples at the USDA. Consumer Rep. 56(10): 663–666, 1991.
64.
GladwellM.U.S. rethinks, redraws the food groups. Washington Post, April 13, 1991, pp. Al, A7.
65.
BurrosM.Testing of pyramid comes full circle. New York Times, March 25, 1992, pp. C1, C4.
66.
Human Nutrition Information Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. USDA's Food Guide Pyramid. Home and Garden Bulletin No. 249. Washington, D.C., April 1992.
67.
WynderE. L.Nutrition: The need to define “optimal” intake as a basis for public policy decisions. Am. J. Public Health82: 346–350, 1992.
68.
Are you eating right?Consumer Rep. 57(10): 644–652, 1992.
69.
JacobsonM.Nutrition Scoreboard, pp. 197–198. Avon, New York, 1974.
