An experiment is reported showing that, of two drawings both of which are readily interpreted as two objects in one or two frontal planes, the one that is disjunctive ambiguous is less preferred aesthetically than a corresponding unambiguous one.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ApterM., The Experience of Motivation. The Theory of Psychological Reversals, Academic Press, London, 1982.
2.
ArnheimR., Art and Visual Perception, University of California Press, Berkeley, 1954.
3.
BerlyneD., Aesthetics and Psychobiology, Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, 1971.
4.
EmpsonW., Seven Types of Ambiguity, The Hogarth Press, London, 1930/1984.
5.
GregoryR. and GombrichE. (eds.), Illusion in Nature and Art, Duckworth, London, 1973.
6.
HochbergJ., Art and Perception, in Handbook of Perception, Vol. X, CarteretteE. C. and FriedmanM. P. (eds.), pp. 225–258, Academic Press, New York, 1978.
7.
KaplanA. and KrisE., Esthetic Ambiguity, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 3, pp. 415–435, 1948.
8.
LangeK.Das Wesen der Kunst, Grote, Berlin, 1907.
9.
MeyerL., Emotion and Meaning in Music, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1956.
10.
TeuberM., Sources of Ambiguity in the Prints of Maurits D. Escher, Scientific American, 231, pp. 90–104, 1974.
11.
VenturiR., Complexity and Contradiction in Architecture, The Museum of Modern Art Papers on Architecture, New York, 1966.
12.
AttneaveF., Triangles as Ambiguous Figures, American Journal of Psychology, 81, pp. 447–453, 1968.
13.
BoselieF., Ambiguity, Beauty, and Interestingness of Line Drawings, Canadian Journal of Psychology, 37, pp. 287–292, 1983.
14.
NickiR.LeeP., and MossV., Ambiguity, Cubist Works of Art, and Preference, Acta Schologica, 49, pp. 27–41, 1981.
15.
NickiR.ForestellP., and ShortP., Uncertainty and Preference for Ambiguous, Impossible Figures and the Drawings of M. C. Escher, Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 20, pp. 277–281, 1979.
16.
BoselieF. and WouterloodD., On Visual Pattern Completion, unpublished manuscript, University of Nijmegen, 1990.
17.
WouterloodD. and BoselieF., A Good-Continuation Model of Some Occlusion Phenomena, Psychological Research, 54, pp. 267–277, 1992.
18.
BoselieF. and WouterloodD., A Critical Discussion of Kellman & Shipley's (1991) Theory of Occlusion Phenomena, Psychological Research, 54, pp. 278–285, 1992.
19.
RockI., The Logic of Perception, Bradford, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1983.
20.
ArnheimR., The Dynamics of Architectural Form, University of California Press, Berkeley, 1977.
21.
FechnerG., Vorschule derAsthetik, Breitkopf und Härtel, Leipzig, 1876.
