Within the field of occupational stress research the theoretical orientation, the research instruments, and the populations studied have largely been standardized on and restricted to male subjects. This article discusses the threats that single-sex studies pose to the valid assessment of the health effects of working life. Following this critique, an empirical examination of the differential distribution of work control is examined within a random sample (n = 13,203) of Swedish working males and females. Results indicate that even in a socially progressive society the labor force continues to be highly sex-segregated. Males, as a group, were found to have access to a larger and more diverse set of jobs than do females, as a group. Work control was found to be consistently higher among men than among women. The highest level of control was found among white-collar men in male-segregated jobs, while the lowest was found among blue-collar women in male-segregated jobs. It was notable that men had a higher level of control than women even in jobs that are traditionally considered “women's work.” The implications of these findings are discussed in terms of future directions in the psychosocial work environment field.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
StellmanJ.Women's Work, Women's Health: Myths and Realities. Pantheon Books, New York, 1977.
2.
ChavikW. (ed.). Double Exposure: Women's Health Hazards on the Job and At Home. Monthly Review Press, New York, 1985.
3.
HrickoA.BruntM.Working for Your Life: A Woman's Guide to Job Health Hazards. Labor Occupational Health Program and Public Citizen's Health Research Group, Washington, D.C., 1976.
4.
Society for Occupational and Environmental Health. Proceedings of Conference on Women and the Workplace. SOEH, Washington, D.C., 1977.
5.
SkrzyckiC.‘Mommy track’ author answers her many critics. Washington Post, March 19, 1988, Section C, p. 1.
6.
PassannanteM. R.NathansonC. A.Women in the labor force: Are sex mortality differentials changing?J. Occup. Med.29(1): 21–28, 1987.
7.
KotlerP.WingardD. L.The effect of occupational, marital and parental roles on mortality: The Alameda County study. Am. J. Public Health79: 607–611, 1989.
8.
LaCroixA. Z.HaynesS. G.Gender differences in the health effects of workplace roles. In Gender and Stress, edited by BarnettR.BaruchG., pp. 122–141. MacMillan, New York, 1987.
9.
HaynesS.FeinleibM.Women, work and coronary heart disease: Prospective findings from the Framingham heart study. Am. J. Public Health70: 133–141, 1980.
10.
HaynesS.FeinleibM.KannelW.The relationship of psychological factors to coronary heart disease in the Framingham study (Part III). Am. J. Epidemiol.111(1): 37–58, 1980.
11.
LaCroixA. Z.HaynesS. G.Occupational exposure to high demand/low control work and coronary heart disease incidence in the Framingham cohort. Paper presented at the Seventh Annual Meeting of the Society for Epidemiological Research, Houston. [Abstract.]Am. J. Epidemiol.120: 341, 1984.
12.
HibbardJ.PopeC.Employment characteristics and health status among men and women. Women and Health12(2): 85–102, 1987.
13.
HawM.Women, work and stress: A review and agenda for the future. J. Health Soc. Behav.23: 132–144, 1982.
14.
VerbruggeL. M.Multiple roles and physical health of women and men. J. Health Soc. Behav.24: 16–30, 1983.
15.
WaldronI.HeroldJ.Employment, attitudes toward employment, and women's health. Women and Health11(1): 79–98, 1986.
16.
MullerC.Health and health care of employed women and homemakers: Family factors. Women and Health11(1): 7–26, 1986.
17.
BarnettR. C.BaruchG. K.Social roles, gender and psychological distress. In Gender and Stress, edited by BarnettR.BaruchG., pp. 122–141. Macmillan, New York, 1987.
18.
GutekB. A.RepettiR. L.SilverD. L.Non-work roles and stress at work. In Causes, Coping and Consequences of Stress at Work, edited by CooperC.PayneR., pp. 141–175. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, 1988.
19.
WarrP.ParryG.Paid employment and women's psychological well-being. Psychol. Bull.91: 498–516, 1982.
20.
FrobergD.GjerdingeneW.PrestonM.Multiple roles and women's mental and physical health: What have we learned. Women and Health11(2): 76–96, 1986.
21.
SekaranU.Dual-Career Families. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 1986.
22.
StainesG. L.PottickK. J.FudgeD. A.Wives' employment attitudes and husbands' attitudes towards work and family. J. Appl. Psychol.71: 118–128, 1986.
23.
OshermanS.DillD.Varying work and family choices: Their impact on men's work satisfaction. J. Marriage Fam. 45: 339–346, 1983.
24.
PfefferJ.RossJ.The effects of marriage and a working wife on occupational and wage attainment. Admin. Sci. Q.27: 66–80, 1982.
25.
PiotrowskiC. S.Work and the Family System. The Free Press, New York, 1979.
26.
HockE.The transition to day care: Effects of maternal separation anxiety on infant adjustment. In The Child and the Day Care Setting: Qualitative Variations and Development, edited by AinslieR. C., Praeger, New York, 1985.
27.
AneshenselC. S.PearlinL. I.Structural contexts of sex differences in stress. In Gender and Stress, edited by BarnettR.BaruchG., pp. 75–96. MacMillan, New York, 1987.
28.
CannonW. B.The Wisdom of the Body. W. W. Norton, New York, 1932.
29.
GoldbergerL.BreznitzS. (eds.). The Handbook of Stress: Theoretical and Clinical Aspects. The Free Press, New York, 1982.
30.
SelyeH.Stress in Health and Disease. Butteiworth, London, 1976.
31.
LeviL. (ed.). Emotions: Their Parameters and Measurement. Raven Press, New York, 1975.
32.
KaslS. V.Stress and disease in the workplace: A methodological commentary on the accumulated evidence. In Health and Industry: A Behavioral Medicine Perspective, edited by CataldoM. F.CoatesT. J., John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1986.
33.
BakerD.The study of stress. Annu. Rev. Public Health6: 367–381, 1985.
34.
CollinsA.Sex Differences in Psychoneuroendocrine Stress Responses: Biological and Social Influences. Doctoral dissertation, Department of Psychology, University of Stockholm, 1985.
35.
CollinsA.FrankenhaeuserM.Stress responses in male and female engineering students. J. Hum. Stress4: 43–48, 1978.
36.
FrankenhaeuserM.Sex differences in psychoneuroendocrine reactions to examination stress. Psychosom. Med.40: 334–343, 1978.
37.
FrankenhaeuserM.Sex differences in reaction to psychosocial stressors and psychoactive drugs. In Society, Stress and Disease, Vol. 3, edited by LeviL., pp. 135–140. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1978.
38.
FrankenhaeuserM.PatkaiD.Interindividual differences in catecholamine excretion during stress. Scand. J. Psychol.6: 117–123, 1965.
39.
FrankenhaeuserM.Challenge-control interaction as reflected in sympathetic-adrenal and pituitary-adrenal activity: Comparisons between the sexes. Scand J. Psychol.Suppl. 1: 158–164, 1982.
40.
KarasekR.Job decision latitude, job demands and cardiovascular disease: A prospective study of Swedish men. Am. J. Public Health71: 694–705, 1981.
41.
TheorellT.Changes in job strain in relation to changes in physiological state. Scand. J. Work Environ. Health14: 189–196, 1988.
42.
AlfredssonL.KarasekR.TheorellT.Myocardial infarction risk and psychosocial work environment characteristics: An analysis of the male Swedish work force. Soc. Sci. Med.16: 463–467, 1982.
43.
JohnsonJ. V.HallE.Job strain, work place social support and cardiovascular disease: A cross sectional study of a random sample of the Swedish working population. Am. J. Public Health78: 1336–1342, 1988.
44.
CasselJ.Psychosocial processes and “stress”: Theoretical formulation. Int. J. Health Serv. 4(3): 471–482, 1974.
45.
GardellB.Alienation and mental health in the modern industrial environment. In Society, Stress and Disease, Vol. 1, edited by LeviL., pp. 148–180. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1971.
46.
GardellB.Scandinavian research in stress in working life. Int. J. Health Serv. 12(1): 31–41, 1982.
47.
JohnsonJ. V.Collective control: Strategies for survival in the workplace. Int. J. Health Serv. 19(3): 469–480, 1989.
48.
JohnsonJ. V.Control, collectivity and the psychosocial work environment. In Job Control and Worker Health, edited by SauterS. L.HurrellJ. J.CooperC. L., pp. 55–74. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1989.
49.
JohnsonJ. V.JohanssonG.HallE. M.Introduction: Work organization, democratization and health. Int. J. Health Serv. 18(4): 629–634, 1988.
50.
SAS Institute Inc. SAS/STAT User's Guide, Release 6.0 Edition. SAS Institute, Cary, N.C., 1988.
51.
FreundR. J.LittellR. C.SAS for Linear Models: A Guide to the ANOVA and GLM Procedures. SAS Institute, Cary, N.C., 1981.
52.
WistrandB.Swedish Women on the Move. The Swedish Institute, Stockholm, 1981.
53.
Haavio-ManillaE. (ed.). Unfinished Democracy: Women in Nordic Politics. Pergamon Press, Oxford, England, 1985.
54.
HecloH.MadsenH.Policy and Politics in Sweden: Principled Pragmatism. Temple University Press, Philadelphia, 1987.
55.
LeviL.The psychological, social and biochemical impacts of unemployment in Sweden: Description of a research project. Int. J. Mental Health13(1–2): 18–34, 1984.
56.
RoosP. A.Gender and Work: A Comparative Analysis of Industrial Societies. State University of New York, Albany, 1985.
57.
AldenC. W.Women's Ways of Earning Money. The Woman's Home Library. A. S. Barnes and Co., New York, 1910.
