Initial Logo Mastery was investigated utilizing a theoretical model purposed by Watson and Busch which examined young children's use of a conceptual strategy which incorporated cursor pointing and computer screen quadrant effects. Results showed that thirty-eight young four- and five-year-olds scored significantly better, fewer keystrokes and fewer errors, when problem solving in the upper left and right quadrants than in either of the two lower quadrants. Means analyses showed children scored higher on task closure and task success in the upper right quadrant, followed by the upper left, and lastly, by the lower left and right screen quadrants.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
PapertS., MindstormsBasic Books, New York, 1980.
2.
SeigelA. W., The Externalization of Cognitive Maps by Children and Adults: In Search of Ways to Ask Better Questions, in Spatial Representation and Behavior Across the Life Span, LibenL. S.PattersonA. W., and NewcombeN. (eds.), Academic Press, New York, pp. 167–194, 1981.
3.
AcredoloL. W., Developmental Change in the Ability to Coordinate Perspectives of a Large-Scale Space, Developmental Psychology, 13, pp. 1–8, 1977.
4.
WatsonJ. A.LangeG., and BrinkleyV. M., Logo Mastery and Spatial Problem-Solving by Young Children: Effects of Logo Language Training, Route-Strategy Training, and Learning Styles on Immediate Learning and Transfer, Journal of Educational Computing Research, (in review).
5.
BrinkleyV. M. and WatsonJ. A., Pointing Behaviors of Preschoolers during Logo Mastery, Journal of Computing in Childhood Education, (in press).
6.
WatsonJ. A. and BuschJ. C., Initial Logo Mastery in Young Children: What Is Learned and What Are the Prerequisites for Learning?Journal of Computing in Childhood Education, 1: 1, pp. 5–19, 1989.
7.
LinnM. C., The Cognitive Consequences of Programming Instruction in Classrooms, Educational Researcher, 14, pp. 14–29, 1985.
8.
DalbeyJ. and LinnM. C., The Demands and Requirements of Computer Programming: A Literature Review, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 1, pp. 253–274, 1985.
9.
DalbeyJ. and LinnM. C., Cognitive Consequences of Programming: Augmentations to Basic Instructions, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 2, pp. 75–92, 1986.
10.
MayerR. E. and FayA. L., A Chain of Cognitive Changes with Learning to Program in Logo, Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, pp. 269–279, 1987.
11.
CampbellP. F.FeinG. G.ScholnickE. K.SchwartzS. S., and FrankR. E., Initial Mastery of the Syntax and Semantics of Logo Positioning Commands, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 2, pp. 357–378, 1986.
12.
FayA. L. and MayerR. E., Children's Naive Conceptions and Confusions about Logo Graphics Commands, Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, pp. 254–268, 1987.
13.
GalliniJ. K., Instructional Conditions for Computer-Based Problem-Solving Environments, Educational Technology, 25, pp. 7–11, 1985.
Logo Computer Systems, Apple Logo (Computer Program), Point Claire, Quebec, Canada, 1982.
16.
Logo Computer Systems, Inc., Apple Sprite Logo (Computer Program), Point Claire, Quebec, Canada, 1984.
17.
KeppelG., Design and Analysis: A Teacher's Handbook (2nd Edition), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1982.
18.
GreggL. W., Spatial Concepts, Spatial Names, and the Development of Executrix Representations, in Children's Thinking: What Develops?SieglerR. (ed.), Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey, pp. 275–290, 1978.
19.
KurlandD. M. and PeaR. D., Children's Mental Models of Recursive Logo Programs, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 1, pp. 235–244, 1985.
20.
PeaR. D. and KurlandD. M., On the Cognitive Effects of Learning Computer Programming, New Ideas in Psychology, 2, pp. 137–168, 1984.
21.
WebbN. M., Microcomputer Learning in Small Groups: Cognitive Requirements and Group Processes, Journal of Educational Psychology, 6, pp. 1076–1088, 1984.
22.
ClementsD. H. and GulloD. F., Effects of Computer Programming on Young Children's Cognition, Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, pp. 1051–1058, 1984.
