A multi-stage study of the practices of expert courseware designers was conducted with the final goal of identifying methods for assisting non-experts with the design of effective instructional systems. A total of 25 expert designers were involved in all stages of the inquiry. A model of the expert courseware design process was created, tested, and refined through four try-outs. The final version of the model included instructional design task descriptions and electronic worksheets. The study revealed a common expert process that included the use of rapid prototypes, an opportunistic method of applying 14 key instructional design tasks, 8 success factors related to courseware design, and design guidelines for 10 preferred instructional strategies for courseware.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BransonR. (1975). Interservice procedures for instructional systems development (4 volumes plus executive summary). Tallahassee, FL: Florida State University, Center for Educational Technology. (National Technical Information Service, 5285 Port Royal Rd., Springfield, VA 22161. Document Nos. AD-A019, 486 to AD-A019 490.)
ClineR. W., & MerrillM. D. (1995). Automated instructional design via instructional transactions. In TennysonR. D. & BaronA. E. (Eds.), Automating instructional design: Computer-based development and delivery tools (pp. 317–353). New York: Springer-Verlag.
4.
CollinsA. (1991). The role of computer technology in restructuring schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 73, 28–36.
5.
de CroockM.PaasF.SchlanbuschH., & van MerrienboerJ. (2002). ADAPT: Tools for training design and evaluation. Educational Technology Research & Development, 50(4), 47–58.
6.
DickW.CareyL., & CareyJ. (2000). The systematic design of instruction (5th ed.). Glenview, IL: Pearson Addison Westley.
7.
DriscollM. (1998). Web-based training: Using technology to design adult learning experiences.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Pfeiffer.
8.
GagneR. M. (1985). The conditions of learning (4th ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
9.
GagneR. M.BriggsL. J., & WagerW. W. (1992). Principles of instructional design (4th ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
10.
GoelV., & PirolliP. (1992). The structure of design problem spaces. Cognitive Science, 16, 395–429.
11.
GrosB., & SpectorJ. M. (1994). Evaluating automated instructional design systems: A complex problem. Educational Technology, 34(5), 37–46.
12.
GustafsonK. (2002). Instructional design tools: A critique and projections for the future. Educational Technology Research & Development, 50(4), 59–66.
13.
GustafsonK., & BranchR. M. (1997). Instructional design models.Syracuse, NY: ERIC Clearinghouse on Information and Technology.
14.
HawkinsJ., & CollinsA. (1992, September). Design-experiments for infusing technology into learning. Educational Technology, 32(9), 63–67.
15.
HirumiA. (2002). The design and sequencing of elearning interactions: A grounded approach. International Journal for E-Learning, 1(1), 19–27.
16.
McKeeneyS.NieveenN., & van den AkkerJ. (2002). Computer support for curriculum developers: CASCADE. Educational Technology Research & Development, 50(4), 25–35.
Merrill, M. D., & ID2 Expert Group. (1996). Instructional transaction theory: Instructional design based on knowledge objects. Educational Technology, 36(3), 30–37.
19.
MerrillM. D. (1997). Learning-oriented instructional development tools. Performance Improvement, 36(3), 51–55.
20.
MIL-HDBK-29612. (1999). Instructional systems development/systems approach to training and education (4 parts). Department of Defense Handbook.
21.
MuraidaD. J., & SpectorJ. M. (1993). The advanced instructional design advisor. Instructional Science, 21(4), 239–253.
22.
PerezR.JohnsonJ. F., & EmeryC. D. (1995). Instructional design expertise: A cognitive model of design. Instructional Science, 23, 321–349.
23.
PirolliP., & GreenoJ. (1988). The problem space of instructional design. In PsotkaJ.MasseyL. D., & MutterS. A. (Eds.), Intelligent tutoring systems: Lessons learned.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
24.
RowlandG. (1992). What do instructional designers actually do? An initial investigation of expert practice. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 5(2), 65–86.
25.
RowlandG. (1999). A tripartite seed: The future creating capacity of designing, learning and systems.Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, Inc.
26.
SchönD. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
27.
SmithP., & RaganT. (1999). Instructional design (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
28.
SpectorJ. M., & SongD. (1995). Automated instructional design advising. In TennysonR. D. & BaronA. E. (Eds.), Automating instructional design: Computer-based development and delivery tools (pp. 377–402). New York: Springer-Verlag.
29.
SpectorJ. M.MuraidaD. J., & MarlinoM. R. (1991). Modeling user interactions with instructional design software. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
30.
Visscher-VoermanI., & GustafsonK. (2004). Paradigms in the theory and practice of education training and design. Educational Technology Research & Development, 52(2), 69–89.
