With the personnel cutback in agricultural extension services at a time when farmers need to receive more agro-technical information than ever, the need for efficient written communication channels between extension and farmers grows. This is especially true for small farmers, like those living in Moshavim, in Israel. A representative sample of 171 farmers were interviewed. They had quite good reading habits and fewer reading problems than could be expected. Farmers also made good use of the extension publications which they received. The main problems encountered were a weak distribution system and the necessity for authors of extension pamphlets and brochures to consider more the special needs of small farmers. The findings in this study reinforce earlier data from other countries on the potential (and actual) value of written communication as an agricultural extension tool.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
RolingN., Paradigm of Glut: The New Context of Extension, Journal of Extension Systems, 3: 2, pp. 25–35, 1987.
2.
ForestL. B. and MarshallM. G., Impact of Extension in Shawano County, University of Wisconsin Extension, Madison, 1977.
3.
FrankieG. W.GrieshopJ. I.KoehlerC. S.GraceJ. K., and HeskethK. A., A Marketing Research Approach for Improving Extension Publications, California Agriculture, 41: 3.4, pp. 28–29, 1987.
4.
Farmers' Use of Information on Cereal Disease and Potato Blight, Report No. 2, Agricultural Development and Advisory Service, Extension Development Unit, Reading, U.K., 1978.
5.
Farmers' Use of “D” Value Information and “Focus on Grass” Leaflets, Report No. 13, Agricultural Development and Advisory Service, Extension Development Unit, Reading, U.K., 1979.
6.
Farmers' Sources of Information, Report No. 15, Agricultural Development and Advisory Service, Extension Development Unit, Reading, U.K., 1980.
7.
BlackburnD. J., Farmers' Use of Publications, University of Guelph, Ontario Agricultural College, Guelph, Ontario, 1972.
8.
BlackburnD. J., Ontario Farm Readership Survey, University of Guelph, Ontario Agricultural College, Guelph, Ontario, 1981.
9.
BlackburnD. J., Second Ontario Farm Readership Survey, University of Guelph, Ontario Agricultural College, Guelph, Ontario, 1984.
10.
BlackburnD. J., Second Readership Survey of OMAF News and Other Media, University of Guelph, Ontario Agricultural College, Guelph, Ontario, 1987.
11.
BardsleyB., Farmers' Assessment of Information and Its Sources, University of Melbourne, School of Agriculture and Forestry, Parkville, Victoria, 1982.
12.
PresserH. A., Printed Information for Dairy Farmers, in Agricultural Extension Research Projects Abstract 1961–1978, PathmanathanC. S. (ed.), University of Melbourne, School of Agriculture and Forestry, p. 45, 1978.
13.
WellsA., Leaflets—The Forgotten Medium, Melbourne Notes in Agricultural Extension, Number 14, pp. 20–38, 1977.
14.
BlumA.BooneE. J.LilesR. T., and CarterG. L., Planning of Research in Agricultural Extension and Extension Training, BARD Technical Report 1-144-79, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Department of Agricultural Education, Rehovot (Israel), 1981.
15.
EveraetH., L'agriculture et la vulgarisation agricole, Cahiers de l'Institut Economique Agricole, Ministere de l'Agriculture (Belgique), no. 196.RR-166, 1977.
16.
HoffmannV., Ausgewaehilte Fakten zum Informationsverhalten von Landwirten und landwirtschaftlichen Beratern, in Medienpraesentation, Landwirtschaftsverlag, Muenster-Hiltrup, 1984.
17.
BranatH. M. P., Van welke vormen van voorlichting maken boeren in Oostelijk Flevoland gebruik?, Agricultural University Wageningen, Vakgroep Voorlichting, 1975.
18.
JelsmaW., Rundveehouders in Zuid Oost Friesland over de inhoud en methoden van voorlichting, Consulentschap voor de Rundveehouderij in Zuid-Oost Friesland, Leeuwarden (Netherlands), 1977.
19.
WestermarckH., An Inquiry About the Finnish Extension Agent's Role and Problems Connected with the Acquisition and Transition of new Farm Information, Acta Agricultura Scandinavica, 25, pp. 64–67, 1975.
20.
CabanillaV. L. and HargroveT. R., The Effectiveness Among Farmers of a Farmer's Primer on Growing Rice in Two Philippine Dialects, IRRI Research Paper Series No. 127, International Rice Research Institute, Manila, 1987.
21.
TrentC. S. and KinlawR., The Effectiveness of Three Media in Disseminating Basic Information to Low Income Families, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, 1976.
22.
NancarrowR. N., Practices and Precautions with Pesticides, in Agricultural Extension Research Projects 1961–1978, PathmanathanC. S. (ed.), University of Melbourne, School of Agriculture and Forestry, Parkville, Victoria, p. 40, 1978.
23.
NehileyJ. M. S. and WilliamsR. D., Targeting Extension Publications, Journal of Extension, 18, pp. 11–17, 1980.
24.
TuoheyC. L., A Study of the Reading Ability of Some Victorian Farmers and the Reading Difficulty of Farmer Publications, in Agricultural Extension Research Projects Abstracts 1961–1978, PathmanathanC. S. (ed.), University of Melbourne, School of Agriculture and Forestry, Parkville, Victoria, p. 17, 1978.
25.
EvansA. M., A Study of the Ability of Farmers to Read Graphs, in Agricultural Research Projects Abstracts 1961–1978, PathmanathanC. S. (ed.), University of Melbourne, School of Agriculture and Forestry, Parkville, Victoria, p. 10, 1978.
26.
EpsteinM., Survey on the Reading of Dossiers on Dairy Farming by Moshav Farmers, Ministry of Agriculture, Extension Service, Tel Aviv (Hebrew), 1979.
27.
MolhoS., Differences in the Behaviour of Producers in Different Forms of Settlement, unpublished Ph.D. thesis, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem (Hebrew), 1973.
28.
BlumA. and AzencotM., The Contact Between Agricultural Extension and Family Farmers in Israel, With Some International Comparisons, paper presented to the 8th European Seminar on Extension Education, Reading, U.K., 1987.
29.
BlumA. and AzencotM., The Contact Between Agricultural Extension and Family Farmers in Israel With Some International Comparisons, Communications, (in press).
30.
BlumA. and AzencotM., Effects of a Story-Based Strategy to Enhance Pupils' Ability and Motivation to Read Biotechnical Texts, Journal of Biological Education, 19: 1, 1985.
31.
BlumA., The Rose Detective—A Strategy to Train Pupils in Reading Biotechnical Texts, Journal of Biological Education, 16: 3, 1982.
