Much of what is known regarding student withdrawal from college is specific to students in a traditional classroom setting. A major issue is whether those same factors play themselves out in much the same manner in courses where technology plays a significant role in the delivery of instruction such as in distance learning programs where technology is particularly important. Research in this area is needed to better understand the influence of technology on student achievement and persistence rates within the context of student retention models. The current study examined the academic and social engagement of students in Web-enhanced courses in distance education programs and the collective impact of cognitive, non-cognitive, and technology-related variables on student performance and withdrawal decisions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BatesA. W. (2000). Managing technological change: Strategies for college and university leaders. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
2.
BonkC. J. & WisherR. A. (2000). Adapting e-learning tools from educational to training environments. Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Distance Teaching & Learning, Madison, Wisconsin, 16, 63–70.
3.
BrophyJ. (1987). Synthesis of research on strategies for motivating students to learn. Educational Leadership, 45, 40–48.
4.
CabreraA. F.NoraA. & CastanedaM. B. (1992). The role of finances in the persistence process: A structural model. Research in Higher Education, 33(5), 571–593.
5.
CabreraA. F.NoraA. & CastanedaM. B. (1993). College persistence: Structural equations modeling test of an integrated model of student retention. Journal of Higher Education, 64(2), 123–139.
6.
CarrS. (2000, February 11). As distance education comes of age, the challenge is keeping the students. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 47, A39.
7.
ChristophelD. M. & GormanJ. (1995). A test-retest analysis of student motivation, teacher immediacy, and perceived sources of motivation and demotivation in college classes. Communication Education, 44, 292–306.
8.
DillonA. & GabbardR. (1998). Hypermedia as an educational technology: A review of the quantitative research literature on learner comprehension, control, and style. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 322–349.
9.
DuderstadtJ. (1999). Can colleges and universities survive the information age? In KatzR. (Ed.), Dancing with the devil: Information technology and the new competition in higher education (pp. 1–25). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
10.
GladieuxL. & SwailW. S. (1999). The virtual university and educational opportunity: Issues of equity and access for the next generation. Washington, DC: The College Board. [Online]. Available at: http://www.collegeboard.org/policy/html/virtual.html.
11.
GorhamJ. & MilletteD. M. (1997). A comparative analysis of teacher and student perceptions of sources of motivation and demotivation in college classes. Communication Education, 46, 245–261.
12.
GreenK. C. (2001). The 2001 national survey of information technology in U.S. higher education. The Campus Computing Project [Online]. Available: http://www.campuscomputing.net.
13.
MatthewsD. (1999, September). The origins of distance education and its use in the United States. Technological Horizons in Education Journal, 27(2), 54–60.
14.
NoraA. (1987). Determinants of retention among Chicano college students: A structural model. Research in Higher Education, 26, 31–59.
15.
NoraA. (1990). Campus-based aid programs as determinants of retention among Hispanic community college students. Journal of Higher Education, 61, 312–331.
16.
NoraA. (2002). The depiction of the significant others in Tinto's “Rites of Passage”: A reconceptualization of the influence of family and community in the persistence process. Journal of College Student Retention, 3(1), 41–56.
17.
NoraA. (2003, April). Access to higher education for Hispanic students: Real or illusory? In JonesL. & Castellanos'J. (Eds.), The majority in the minority: Retaining Latina/o faculty, administrators and students. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing, LLC.
18.
NoraA. (2004). The role of habitus and cultural capital in choosing a college, transitioning from high school to higher education, and persisting in college among minority and non-minority students. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 3(2), 180–208.
19.
NoraA.BarlowL. & CrispG. (2005). Student persistence and degree attainment beyond the first year in college: The need for research. In SiedmanA. (Ed.), College student retention: Formula for student success (pp. 129–154). Westport, CT: Praeger (American Council on Education).
20.
NoraA. & CabreraA. F. (1993). The construct validity of institutional commitment: A confirmatory factor analysis. Research in Higher Education, 34(2), 243–262.
21.
NoraA. & CabreraA. F. (1996). The role of perceptions of prejudice and discrimination on the adjustment of minority students to college. Journal of Higher Education, 67(2), 119–148.
22.
PascarellaE. T. & TerenziniP. T. (1991). How college affects students. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
23.
Pew Internet & American Life Project. (2002). The Internet goes to college: How students are living in the future with today's technology. Washington, DC: Author.
24.
RichardsonJ. T. E. (2000). Researching student learning. Philadelphia, PA: The Society for the Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
25.
St JohnE. P.CabreraA. F.NoraA. & AskerE. H. (2000). Economic influences on persistence reconsidered: How can finance research inform the reconceptualization of persistence models? In BraxtonJ. M. (Ed.), Reworking the student departure puzzle (pp. 29–47). Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
26.
TaylorC. D. & EustisJ. D. (1999). Assessing the changing impact of technology on teaching and learning at Virginia Tech: A case study. In VolkweinJ. F. (Series Ed.) & KatzR. N. & RudyJ. A. (Vol. Ed.), New directions for institutional research: Information technology in higher education: Assessing its impact and planning for the future (No. 102, pp. 55–71). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
27.
The Institute for Higher Education Policy. (1999). Distance learning in higher education. [Online]. Available at: http://www.ihep.com/ace.pdf.
28.
TintoV. (1975). Drop out from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research, 45(1), 89–125.
29.
TintoV. (1987). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
30.
TintoV. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
31.
U.S. Department of Education. National Center for Educational Statistics. (1999). Distance education at postsecondary education institutions: 1997–98 (NCES 2000–013). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
32.
WldkowskiR. J. (1978). Motivation and teaching. Washington, DC: National Education Association.
