Many colleges and universities are expected to produce more graduates while responding to an increasing level of racial and ethnic diversity among students. While the importance of diversity within executive management leadership teams may be accepted among nonprofit higher education institutions, the connection between diversity among the leadership in higher education and the retention of minority students has not been empirically established. This study, focusing on Texas public colleges and universities, finds that: 1) a diverse executive management team makes a positive difference in minority student retention at community colleges and 4-year universities institutions; and 2) the impact of a diverse executive management team on retention is not limited to race and ethnicity, but instead includes other demographic aspects.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllisonP. D. (1978). Measures of inequality. American Sociological Review, 43, 865–880.
2.
American Association of School Administrators. (2001). Who's who in education. Arlington, VA.
3.
American Council on Education. (1984). Statistics you can use: Growth in nontraditional students, 1972–1982. Higher Education & National Affairs, 3.
4.
American Council on Education. (1986). Higher education is a U.S. industry, Higher Education and National Affairs, 3.
5.
ApodacaE. (2000). Crisis in the ranks: The under-representation of Hispanic faculty & administrators in Texas higher education. Tache Noticiario, 8, 1–6.
6.
AshbyE. (1967). Ivory towers in tomorrow's world. The Journal of Higher Education, 8, 417–427.
7.
BeckerG. (1992). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis with special reference to education (3rd ed.). National Bureau of Economic Research. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
8.
BensimonE. & SotoM. (1997). Can we rebuild civic life without a multiracial university?Change, 29(1), 42–45.
ChenG.LiuC. & TjosvoldD. (2005). Conflict management for effective top management teams and innovation in China. Journal of Management Studies, 42, 277–300.
11.
Chronicle of Higher Education. (2004). Almanac. 2003–2004, 50(1), A2.
12.
Consortium for Student Retention Data Exchange. (2003). Executive summary 2001–2002 CSRDE report. Norman, OK.Center for Institutional Data Exchange and Analysis, University of Oklahoma.
13.
DumaineB. (1993, December 13). Payoff from the new management. Fortune, 103–110.
14.
DuttonJ. E. & DuncanR. B. (1987). The creation of momentum for change through the process of strategic issue diagnosis. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 279–295.
15.
FloresS.HornC. & CrispG. (2006). Community colleges, public policy, and Latino student opportunity. New Direction for Community Colleges, 133, 71–80.
16.
FreelandR. (1992). The world transformed: A golden age for American universities, 1945–1970. London: Oxford University Press.
17.
Gale Literary Databases. (2002). Contemporary authors database. Farmington, MI: Mills.
18.
GibsonC. & LennonE. (2001). Historical census statistics on the foreign-born population of the United States,: 1850–1990. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.
19.
GollI.SambharyaR. & TucciL. (2001). Top management team composition, corporate ideology, and firm performance. Management International Review, 41(2), 109–129.
20.
GoodchildL. (1986). The turning point in American Jesuit higher education: The standardization controversy between the Jesuits and the north central association, 1915–1940. History of Higher Education Annual, 6.
21.
GrayW. (1999). Increasing minority opportunities and achievement in doctoral programs. In Leadership summit on diversity in doctoral education. Proceedings of a Conference Sponsored by the U.S. Department of Education, June 2–3.
HittM.IrelandD. & HoskissonR. (2001). Strategic management: Competitiveness and globalization (4th ed.). Cincinnati, OH: South-Western College Publishing.
24.
KerrC. (1998, January/February). Clark Kerr's perspective on leadership challenges. Change, 11.
25.
KerrJ. (1984). From Truman to Johnson: Ad hoc policy formulation in higher education. Review of Higher Education, 8(1), 15–54.
26.
KuznetsS. (1954). Income and wealth in the U.S. In Distribution by industrial origin. London, UK: Cambridge University Press.
27.
LondonM.PolzerJ. & OmoregieH. (2005). Interpersonal congruence, transactive memory, and feedback processes. Human Resource Development Review, 4(2), 114–135.
28.
MaldonadoL. & WillieC. (1996). Developing a “pipeline” recruitment program for minority faculty. In RendonL. I. & HopeR. O. (Eds.), Educating a new majority: Transforming America's educational system for diversity. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
29.
MillerC.BurkeL. & GlickW. (1998). Cognitive diversity among upper-echelon executives: Implications for strategic decision processes. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 39–58.
30.
MooreheadG. & GriffinR. (1998). Organizational behavior: Managing people and organizations. New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.
31.
National Vital Statistics. (2002). Report Births: Final Data for 2000, 50(5), 104.
32.
NofstraJ. & NewboldK. (2007). Historical underpinnings of access to American higher education. New Directions for Higher Education, 138, 3–18.
33.
OlivasM. (1982, January/April). Indian, Chicano, and Puerto Rican colleges: Status and issues. Bilingual Review, 9, 36–58.
34.
PelledL.EisenhardtK. & XinK. (1999). Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 1–28.
35.
PitcherP. & SmithA. (2001). Top management team heterogeneity: Personality, power, and proxies. Organization Science, 12(1), 1–18.
36.
RajagopalanN.RasheedA. & DattaD. (1993). Strategic decision processes: Critical review and future directions. Journal of Management, 19(2), 349–384.
37.
SeidmanA. (2005). Minority student retention: Resources for practitioners. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2005(125), 7–24.
38.
ShookC.PayneG. & VogesK. (2005). The “what” in top management group conflict: The effects of organizational issue interpretation on conflict among hospital decision-makers. Journal of Managerial Issues, 17(2), 162–177.
39.
Texas Association of Chicanos in Higher Education (TACHE). (1986). The Mexican-American and Texas higher education. A report for the Texas Select Committee on Higher Education. Austin, TX: Author.
Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB). (2001). Closing the gaps by 2015. Austin, TX: Author.
42.
Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB). (2002a). Fall headcount enrollment: Texas public community, technical, and state colleges, 1997–2001. Austin, TX: Author.
43.
Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB). (2002b). Fall headcount enrollment: Texas public universities, 1997–2001. Austin, TX: Author.
44.
TihanyiL.EllstrandA.DailyC. & DaltonD. (2000). Composition of the top management team and firm international diversification. Journal of Management, 26(6), 1157–1177.
45.
TjosvoldD. (2006). Defining conflict and making choices about its management: Lighting the dark side of organizational life. International Journal of Conflict Management, 17, 87–89.
46.
TjosvoldD.YuZ. & HuiC. (2004). Team learning from mistakes: The contribution of cooperative goals and problem-solving. Journal of Management Studies, 41, 1223–1245.
47.
TrowM. (1988). American higher education: Past, present and future. Educational Researcher, 17(3), 13–23.
48.
Truman Commission. (1947). 1946 Commission on Higher Education report. Washington, DC: Office of Education.
49.
Van der VegtG. & BundersonJ. (2005). Learning and performance in multi-disciplinary teams: The importance of collective identification. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 532–547.
50.
WestC. & SchwenkC. (1996). Top management team strategic consensus, demographic homogeneity and firm performance: A report of resounding nonfindings. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 571–576.
51.
WiersemaM. & BantelK. (1992). Top management team demography and corporate strategic change. Academy of Management Journal, 35(1), 91–121.
52.
WildasinD. (2006). Global competition for mobile resources: Implications for equity, efficiency public economy. CESifo Economic Studies, 52, 61–111.
53.
WongS. (2004). Distal and local group learning: Performance tradeoffs and tensions. Organization Science, 15, 645–656.
