Negative Impact of Employment on Engineering Student Time Management,Time to Degree,and Retention: Faculty,Administrator,and Staff Perspectives

Abstract

Interviews with faculty, administrators, staff, and students at four engineering programs reveal the role of undergraduate student employment on retention and timely degree completion among engineering students. Dueling narratives reveal how student approaches to earning an engineering degree differ greatly from faculty, administrator, and staff expectations. Faculty, administrators, and staff advise students on proper time management and are frustrated that student employment reflects a lack of commitment to engineering. Students acknowledge the challenges of balancing school and work yet consider employment important to student life. Some students adjust their course schedules to meet work demands, thus increasing time to degree. Faculty describe a seamless pathway to an engineering career through coursework, scholarships, undergraduate research opportunities, and internships. Students remain employed because scholarships do not sufficiently meet their financial needs and internships are not convenient for all students.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Astin

A. W.

(1993). Preventing students from dropping out. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Borman

K. M.

Tyson

, & Halperin

(Eds.). (2010). Becoming an engineer in public universities: Pathways for women and minorities. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Bradburn

E. M.

Nevill

, & Cataldi

E. F.

(2006). Where are they now? A description of 1992–93 bachelor's degree recipients 10 years later (NCES 2007–159). U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

Dundes

, & Marx

(2006). Balancing work and academics in college: Why do students working 10 to 19 hours per week excel? Journal of College Student Retention, 8, 107–120.

Henke

J. W.

Lyons

T. F.

, & Krachenberg

A. R.

(1993). Knowing your market: How working students balance work, grades, and course load. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 4(1/2), 191–203.

Horn

L. J.

, & Malizio

(1998). Undergraduates who work: National postsecondary student aid study, 1996. National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement Publication No. NCES 98-137. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Huang

(2007). Relatedness between jobs and academic majors: Its relationship to academic involvement of college students. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance, 7, 111–122.

King

J. E.

(2006). Working their way through college: Student employment and its impact on the college experience. ACE Issue Brief. American Council on Education, Center for Policy Analysis.

Lammers

W. J.

Onwuegbizie

A. J.

, & Slate

J. R.

(2001). Academic success as a function of the gender, class, age, study habits, and employment of college students. Research in the Schools, 8(2), 71–81.

10.

Mars

M. M.

Slaughter

, & Rhoades

(2008). The state-sponsored student entrepreneur. The Journal of Higher Education, 79(6), 638–670.

11.

Planty

Hussar

Snyder

Provasnik

Kena

Dinkes

(2008). The condition of education 2008 (NCES 2008–031). Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

12.

Riggert

S. C.

Boyle

Petrosko

J. M.

Ash

, & Rude-Parkins

(2006). Student employment and higher education: Empiricism and contradiction. Review of Educational Research, 76, 63–92.

13.

Slaughter

, & Rhoades

(2004). Academic capitalism and the new economy: Markets, state, and higher education. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

14.

Tinto

(1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

15.

Tyson

(2011). Modeling engineering degree attainment using high school and college physics and calculus coursetaking and achievement. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(4), 1–18.

16.

U.S. Department of Education. National Center for Education Statistics. (1999). Life after college: A descriptive summary of 1992–93 bachelor's degree recipients in 1997, with an essay on participation in graduate and first-professional education, NCES 1999–155, by McCormick

A. C.

Nuñez

A.-M.

Shah

, & Choy

S. P.

. Project Officer: P. R. Knepper, Washington, DC.

17.

Veenstra

C. P.

Dey

E. L.

, & Herrin

G. D.

(2008). Is the modeling of freshman engineering success different from modeling of non-engineering success? Journal of Engineering Education, 97(4), 467–479.

18.

Veenstra

C. P.

Dey

E. L.

, & Herrin

G. D.

(2009). A model for freshman engineering retention. Advances in Engineering Education, 1(3), 1–33.

19.

Watts

, & Pickering

(2000). Pay as you learn: Student employment and academic progress. Education & Training, 42(3), 129–135.