Open access is central to the Community College mission. For this reason, any restriction in online enrollments should not be undertaken lightly. This study uses institutional data gathered from a large, urban community college to examine a policy aimed at increasing student retention in online courses by restricting those eligible to enroll based on Grade Point Average (GPA) The data, counter to expectations, show that the policy did not significantly impact attrition rates. Further analysis reveals that a high GPA cut-off (3.0) is needed to significantly affect attrition rates; however, this would severely restrict those eligible to enroll. The data indicate that students in the middle GPA range (2.0–3.5) have the highest proportional difference in attrition between online and face-to-face courses. The results suggest that rather than focusing on GPA restrictions, community colleges may be better served by addressing research and interventions targeted toward other factors to increase student retention in online learning.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbelR. (2005). Achieving success in Internet support learning in higher education: Case studies illuminate success factors, challenges and future directions. Alliance for Higher Education Competitiveness. Retrieved October 4, 2009 from http://www.a-hec.org/media/files/A-HEC_IsL0205_6.pdf.
2.
AdelmanC. (2006). The toolbox revisited: Paths to degree completion from high school through college. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved October 10, 2010 from www.ed.gov/rschstat/research/pubs/toolboxrevisit/index.html.
AngelinoL. M.WilliamsF. K. & NatvigN. (2007). Strategies to engage online students and reduce attrition rates. The Journal of Educators Online, 4(2), July 2007.
5.
AstinA. W. (1993). What matters in college: Four critical years revisited. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
6.
BaileyT. R.CalcagnoJ. C.JenkinsD.KienzlG. & LeinbachT. (2005). Community college student success: What institutional characteristics make a difference? No. Community College Working Paper No. 3). New York, NY: Teachers College, Columbia University.
7.
BaileyT. R.JenkinsD. & LeinbachT. (2005, September). Graduation rates, student goals, and measuring community college effectiveness. CCRC Brief, no. 28.
8.
BarefootB. O. (2004). Higher education's revolving door: Confronting the problem of student drop out in U.S. colleges and universities. Open Learning, 19(1), 9–18.
9.
BeanJ. P. & MetznerB. S. (1985). A conceptual model of nontraditional undergraduate student attrition. Review of Educational Research, 55, 485–508, 520–539.
10.
BissettH. G. (1995). Selective admissions in community college nursing programs: Ethical considerations. Community College Review, 22(4), 35–46.
11.
BocchiJ.EastmanJ. K. & SwiftC. O. (2004). Retaining the online learner: Profile of students in an online MBA program and implications for teaching them. Journal of Education for Business, 79(4), 245–253.
12.
BowlesS. & GintisH. (2003). Schooling in capitalist America twenty-five years later. Sociological Forum, 18(2), 343–348.
13.
BrickM. J. (1963). Forum and focus of the community college movement. New York, NY: Teachers College Press, Columbia University.
14.
CabreraA. F.CastenadaM. B.NoraA. & HengstlerD. (1992). The convergence between two theories of persistence. Journal of Higher Education, 63(2), 143–163.
15.
CabreraA. F.NoraA. & CastenadaM. B. (1993). College persistence: Structural equations modeling test of an integrated model of student retention. Journal of Higher Education, 64, 123–139.
16.
CarrS. (2000). As distance education comes of age, the challenge is keeping the students. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 46(3), A39–A41.
17.
CejdaB. D. & ReweyK. L. (1998). The effect of academic factors on transfer student persistence and graduation: A community college to liberal arts college case study. Community College Journal of Research & Practice, 22, 675–686.
18.
CohenA. M. & BrawerF. (1996). The American community college. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
19.
Community college students: Goals, academic preparation, and outcomes. (2003). No. NCES 2003-164). Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics, U.S. Department of Education.
GrahamS. W. & HughesJ. C. (1994). Moving down the road: Community college student's academic performance at the university. Community College Journal of Research & Practice, 18, 449–464.
24.
Groups worry about Nevada's tougher admissions standards. (2008, July 14). Community College Week, p. 17.
25.
HaworthK. (1999). Many 2–year colleges impose tougher academic standards. Chronicle of Higher Education, 45(20), 33–34.
26.
HigbeeM. J. (1973). Upper division colleges: An end to transfer hurdles. Community and Junior College Journal, 43(6), 44–48.
27.
HoffmanJ. L. & LowitzkiK. E. (2005). Predicting college success with high school grades and test scores: Limitations for minority students. The Review of Higher Education, 28(4), 455–474.
28.
HolderB. (2007). An investigation of hope, academics, environment, and motivation as predictors of persistence in higher education online programs. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(4), 245–260.
29.
KemberD. (1995). Open learning courses for adults. A model of student progress. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
30.
KraemerB. (1993). The dimensionality of academic and social integration in persistence studies of Hispanic students. Pittsburg, PA: Association for the Study of Higher Education.
31.
LavinD. E. (1997). The past and future of community colleges under a system of open admissions. Community Review, 15, 12–17.
32.
LorenzettiJ. P. (2008). 14 ways faculty can improve online student retention. Recruitment & Retention in Higher Education, 22(12), 6–7.
MetznerB. S. & BeanJ. P. (1987). The estimation of a conceptual model of nontraditional undergraduate student attrition. Research in Higher Education, 27(1), 15–38.
35.
MetznerB. S.LauerJ. & RajeckiD. (2003). Predicting persistence among psychology majors at an urban university. North American Journal of Psychology, 5(1), 55–60.
36.
MoodyJ. (2004). Distance education: Why are the attrition rates so high?The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 5(3), 205–210.
37.
MorrisL. V.WuS.-S. & FinneganC. L. (2005). Predicting retention in online general education courses. The American Journal of Distance Education. 19(1), 23–36.
38.
MuseH. E. (2003). The web-based community college student: An examination of factors that lead to success and risk. The Internet and Higher Education, 6(3), 241–261.
39.
NobleD. F. (2001). Digital diploma mills: The automation of higher education. New York, NY: Monthly Review Press.
40.
NobleJ. & SawyerR. (2002). Predicting different levels of academic success in college using high school GPA and ACT composite score No. 2004-4. Iowa City, IA: ACT.
41.
NoraA. (1987). Determinants of retention among Chicano students. Research in Higher Education, 26, 31–59.
42.
NoraA.AttinasiL. C.Jr. & MatonakA. (1990). Testing qualitative indicators of Pre College factors in Tinto's attrition model: A community college student population. The Review of Higher Education, 13(3), 337–356.
43.
NoraA. & CabreraA. F. (1996). The role of perceptions of prejudice and discrimination on the adjustment of minority students to college. The Journal of Higher Education, 67(02), 119–148.
44.
NoraA. & RendonL. (1990). Differences in mathematics and science preparation and participation among community college minority and non-minority students. Community College Review, 18(2), 29–40.
45.
NoraA.BarlowE. & CrispG. (2005). Student persistence and degree attainment beyond the first year of college. In SeidmenA. (Ed.) College student retention: Formula for student success (pp. 129–310). Westport, CT: Praeger.
OblingerD. G. & OblingerJ. L. (2005). Chapter 2: Is it age or IT: First steps toward understanding the net generation. In OblingerD. G. & OblingerJ. L. (Eds.), Educating the net generation. Washington, DC: Educause. Available at www.educause.edu/educatingthenetgen/.
48.
ParsadB. & LewisL. (2008). Distance education at degree-granting postsecondary institutions: 2006–07. No. NCES 2009-044, National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education.
49.
PascarellaE. T. (1980). Student-faculty informal contact and college outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 50, 545–595.
50.
PascarellaE. T. & ChapmanD. W. (1983). A multi-institutional, path analytic validation of Tinto's model of college withdrawal. American Educational Research Journal, 20, 87–102.
51.
PascarellaE. T.SmartJ. C. & EthingtonC. (1986). Long term persistence of two year college students. Research in Higher Education, 24, 47–71.
52.
PascarellaE. T. & TerenziniP. T. (1991). How college affects students: Findings from twenty years of research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
53.
PiggeF. L. & MarsoR. N. (1992). A longitudinal comparison of the academic affective, and personal characteristics of persisters and nonpersisters in teacher training. Annual Conference of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
54.
PutreL. (2008). Online orientation boosts retention while addressing honor code. Recruitment & Retention in Higher Education, 22(12), 5–7.
55.
ReitanoJ. (1999). CUNY's community colleges: Democratic education on trial. New Directions for Community Colleges, 1999(107), 23–40.
56.
RovaiA. P. (2003). In Search of Higher Persistence Rates in Distance Education Online Programs. The Internet and Higher Education, 6, 1–16.
57.
SantovecM. L. (2004). Assessing on line programs with the balanced scorecard. Distance Education Report, 8(11), 5–6.
58.
ShannonH. D. & SmithR. C. (2006). A case for the community college's open access admission. In TownsendB. K. & DoughertyK. J. (Eds.), Community college missions in the 21st century (pp. 15–21). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
59.
SoreyK. C. & DugganM. H. (2008). Differential predictors of persistence between community college adult and traditional-aged students. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 32(2), 75–100.
60.
StageF. K. (1989). Motivation, academic and social integration, the early dropout. American Educational Research Journal, 26(3), 385–402.
61.
StahlV. V. & PavelD. M. (1992). Assessing the Bean and Metzner model with community college student data. 73rd Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.RIESEP1992; ERIC ED344639.
62.
SueS. & AbeJ. (1988). Predictors of academic achievement among Asian-American and white students. New York, NY: College Board.
63.
TintoV. (1975). Dropouts from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research, 45, 89–125.
64.
TintoV. (1986). Theories of student departure revisited. In SmartJ. C. (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 359–384). New York, NY: Agathon.
65.
TintoV. (1987). Leaving college. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
66.
TintoV. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
67.
TrowM. (1988). American higher education: Past, present and future. Educational Researcher, 15, 13–23.
68.
Tyler-SmithK. (2006, June). Early attrition among first time E-learners: A review of factors that contribute to dropout, withdrawal and non-completion rates of adult learners undertaking E-learning programs. Journal of Online Learning and Technology, 2(2), 73–85.
69.
WillgingP. A. & JohnsonS. D. (2004). Factors that influence students' decision to drop out of online courses. Journal for Asynchronous Learning Networks, 8(4), 105–118.
