Informed by the experiences of former peer mentors, this qualitative study examines the structure of opportunity of a university retention program. Extending the concept of social capital, the study investigates the experiences of students who served as peer mentors, and how their involvement in the retention program has influenced their social and academic development while in college. Findings suggest that employing peer mentors can be mutually beneficial to retention efforts since the peer mentors were trained to demonstrate aspects of advocacy, role modeling, and acting as human bridges for the program participants while also benefiting from those very forms of institutional support embedded in the program structure. Specifically, peer mentors developed important peer-to-peer and peer-to-staff social relationships that aided in their own retention.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AstinA. W. (1996). Involvement in learning revisited: Lessons we have learned. Journal of College Student Development, 37(2), 123–134.
2.
BaronJ. N.Davis-BlakeA. & BielbyW. T. (1986). The structure of opportunity: How promotion ladders vary within and among organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, 248–273.
3.
BelchH. A. (2004). Retention and students with disabilities. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 6(1), 3–22.
4.
BergerJ. B. (2001). Understanding the organizational nature of student persistence: Empirically-based recommendations for practice. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 3(1), 3–21.
5.
BogdanR. C. & BiklenS. K. (2007). Qualitative research for education. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
6.
BourdieuP. (1973). Cultural reproduction and social reproduction. In BrownR. (Ed.), Knowledge, education and cultural change (pp. 71–112). London, UK: Tavistock Publications Limited.
7.
BourdieuP. (1977). Cultural reproduction and social reproduction. In KarabelJ. & HalseyA. H. (Eds.), Power and ideology in education (pp. 487–511). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
8.
BraxtonJ. M.BrierE. M. & SteeleS. E. (2007). Shaping retention from research to practice. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 9(3), 377–399.
9.
BudgeS. (2006). Peer mentoring in post-secondary education: Implications for research and practice. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 37(1), 73–87.
10.
ChaseS. (2005). Narrative inquiry: Multiple lenses, approaches, voices. In DenzinN. K. & LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.; pp. 651–680). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11.
CipolleS. B. (2010). Service-learning and social justice: Engaging students in social change. London, UK: Rowman & Littlefield.
12.
ColemanJ. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. The American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120.
13.
CreswellJ. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14.
CrispG. (2008). The effect of mentoring on community college persistence. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Jacksonville.
15.
CrispG. & CruzI. (2009). Mentoring college students: A critical review of the literature between 1990 and 2007. Research in Higher Education, 50, 525–545.
16.
GoodJ. M.HalpinG. & HalpinG. (2000). A promising prospect for minority retention: Students becoming peer mentors. Journal of Negro Education, 69(4), 375–383.
17.
Grant-ValloneE. J. & EnsherE. A. (2000). Effects of peer mentoring on types of mentor support, program satisfaction and graduate student stress: A dyadic perspective. Journal of College Student Development, 41(6), 637–642.
18.
HarmonB. V. (2006). A qualitative study of the learning processes and outcomes associated with students who serve as peer mentors. Journal of the First-Year Experience & Students in Transition, 18(2), 53–82.
19.
JacobiM. (1991). Mentoring and undergraduate academic success: A literature review. Review of Education Research, 61(4), 505–532.
20.
KuhG. D. & WhittE. J. (2000). Culture in American colleges and universities. In BrownM. C. (Ed.), Organization & governance in higher education (pp. 160–169). Boston, MA: Pearson Custom Publishing.
21.
LinN. (1999). Building a network theory of social capital. Connections, 22(1), 28–51.
22.
Lopez-MulnixE. E. & MulnixM. W. (2006). Models of excellence in multicultural colleges and universities. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 5(1), 4–21.
23.
MaldonadoD. E. Z.RhoadsR. & BuenavistaT. L. (2005). The student-initiated retention project: Theoretical contributions and the role of self-empowerment. American Educational Research Journal, 42(4), 605–638.
24.
McLeanM. (2004). Does the curriculum matter in peer mentoring? From mentee to mentor in problem-based learning: A unique case study. Mentoring and Tutoring, 12(2), 173–188.
25.
MertensD. M. (1998). Research methods in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative and qualitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26.
MonteA. E.SleemanK. A. & HeinG. L. (2007). Does peer mentoring increase retention of the mentor? Paper presented at the ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Milwaukee, WI.
27.
MorganD. L. & KruegerR. A. (1993). When to use focus groups and why. In MorganD. L. (Ed.), Successful focus groups: Advancing the state of the art (pp. 3–19). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
28.
MuseusS. D. (2008). The role of ethnic student organizations in fostering African American and Asian American students' cultural adjustment and membership at predominantly White institutions. Journal of College Student Development, 49(6), 568–586.
29.
NoraA. & CrispG. (2007). Mentoring students: Conceptualizing and validating the multi-dimensions of a support system. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 9(3), 337–356.
30.
OsegueraL.LocksA. M. & VegaI. I. (2009). Increasing Latina/o students' baccalaureate attainment: A focus on retention. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 8(1), 23–53.
31.
PeckA. (2011). Peer involvement advisors improve first-year student engagement and retention. About Campus, 16(3), 22–25.
32.
PortesA. (2000). Two meanings of social capital. Sociological Forum, 15(1), 1–12.
33.
RiessmanC. K. (1993). Narrative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34.
RosenbaumJ. E. (1978). The structure of opportunity in school. Social Forces, 57(1), 236–256.
35.
SquiresG. D. & KubrinC. E. (2006). Privileged places: Race, residence, and the structure of opportunity. Boulder, CO: Lynne Reinner Publishers.
36.
Stanton-SalazarR. D. (2001). Manufacturing hope and despair: The school and kin networks of U.S. Mexican Youth. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
37.
StrayhornT. L. & TerrellM. C. (2007). Mentoring and satisfaction with college for Black students. The Negro Educational Review, 58(1–2), 69–83.
38.
TierneyW. G. & VenegasK. M. (2006). Fictive kin and social capital: The role of peer groups in applying and paying for college. American Behavioral Scientist, 49(12), 1687–1702.
39.
TintoV. (1975). Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research, 45(1), 89–125.
40.
TorresV. & HernandezE. (2009). Evidence of an identified advisor/mentor on urban Latino students' college experience. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 11(1), 141–160.
41.
WibeckV.DahlgrenM. A. & ObergG. (2007). Learning in focus groups: An analytical dimension for enhancing focus group research. Qualitative Research, 7(2), 249–267.
42.
VaidyaS. R. (1994). Improving teaching and learning through peer coaching. Theory and Literature Review, 115(2), 241–246.
