The National 4-H Council developed the Health Rocks substance abuse educational program to prevent youth from engaging in risky behaviors. The program was presented in 2010 to more than 8,000 middle school youth in Georgia. A post-then-pre evaluation was conducted with youth who completed 10 hours of instruction to determine if changes in youth knowledge, beliefs/attitudes, skills, and behavioral intentions occurred during the course of the program. This study sought to measure the impact of the program and critically evaluate the questionnaire used. The data revealed statistically significant increases in knowledge, beliefs/attitudes, skills, and behavioral intentions of participating youth. Suggestions for improvement of the questionnaire included utilizing questions that are more specific to the curriculum and adding questions to measure the influence of peer pressure.
AllenJ. M., & NimonK. (2007). Retrospective pre-test: A practical technique for professional development evaluation. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 44(3), 27–42.
3.
AryD.JacobsL. C., & RazaviehA. (2002). Introduction to research in education (6th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
4.
BrownJ. H. (2001). Youth, drugs and resilience education. Journal of Drug Education, 31(1), 83–122.
5.
CarminesE. G., & ZellerR. A. (1979). Reliability and validity assessment. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
6.
CohenJ. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159.
EnnettS. T.ToblerN. S.RingwaltC. L., & FlewellingR. L. (1994). How effective is drug abuse resistance education? A meta-analysis of Project DARE outcome evaluations. American Journal of Public Health, 84(9), 1394–1401.
9.
EvansA., & BosworthK. (1997). Building effective drug education programs. Phi Delta Kappa International Research Bulletin, no. 19.Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa Center for Evaluation, Development, and Research.
10.
FinkeL., & WilliamsJ. (1999). Alcohol and drug use of inter-city versus rural school age children. Journal of Drug Education, 29(3), 279–291.
11.
FowlerR.RichC., & YoungD. (1986). San Diego suicide study: II. Substance abuse in young cases. Archives of General Psychiatry, 43(10), 962–965.
12.
FraenkelJ. R., & WallenN. E. (2006). How to design and evaluate research in education (6th ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw Hill.
13.
GouldthorpeJ. L., & IsraelG. D. (2013). Capturing change: Comparing pretest-posttest and retrospective evaluation methods. WC135. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences. Retrieved from http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/wc135
14.
HowardG. S., & DaileyP. R. (1979). Response-shift bias: A source of contamination of self-report measures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64(2), 144–150. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.64.2.144
15.
IsraelG.DiehlD., & Galindo-GonzalezS. (2009). Evaluation situations, stakeholders, and strategies. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida Press. Retrieved from http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/pdffiles/WC/WC09000.pdf
16.
JowersK.BradshawC., & GatelyS. (2007). Taking school-based substance abuse prevention to scale: District-wide implementation of Keep A Clear Mind. Journal of Alcohol & Drug Education, 51(3), 73–91.
17.
LinnR. L., & SlindeJ. A. (1977). The determination of the significance of change between pre- and posttesting periods. Review of Educational Research, 47(1), 121–150.
18.
LynamD. R.MillichR.ZimmermanR.NovakS. P.LoganT. K.MartinC. (1999). Project DARE: No effects at 10 year follow-up. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67(4), 590–593.
19.
MerriamS. B.CaffarellaR. S., & BaumgartnerL. M. (2007). Learning in adulthood: A comprehensive guide (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
20.
MidfordR.MunroG.McBrideN.SnowP., & LadzinskiU. (2002). Principles that underpin effective school-based drug education. Journal of Drug Education, 32(4), 363–386.
National Research Council (NRC). (2001). Informing America's policy on illegal drugs: What we don't know keeps hurting us. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
25.
NimonK.ZigarmiD., & AllenJ. (2011). Measures of program effectiveness based on retrospective pretest data: Are all created equal?American Journal of Evaluation, 32(1), 8–28.
26.
NunnallyJ. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
27.
PrattC. C.McGuiganW. M., & KatzevA. R. (2000). Measuring program outcomes: Using retrospective pretest methodology. American Journal of Evaluation, 21(3), 341–349.
28.
RindskopfD., & SaxeL. (1998). Zero effects in substance abuse programs: Avoiding false positives and false negatives in the evaluation of community based programs. Evaluation Review, 22, 78–94.
29.
RobertsT. G.FournetG. P., & PenlandE. (1995). A comparison of the attitudes toward alcohol and drug use and school support by grade level, gender, and ethnicity. Journal of Alcohol and Drug Education, 40(2), 112–127.
SaxeL.KadushanC.TigheE.BeveridgeA.LivertD.BrodskyA. (2006). Community based prevention programs in the war on drugs: Findings from the “Fighting Back” demonstration. Journal of Drug Issues, 36(2), 263–294.
VincusA.RingwaltC.HarrisM., & ShamblenS. (2010). A short-term, quasi-experimental evaluation of D.A.R.E.'s revised elementary school curriculum. Journal of Drug Education, 40(1), 37–49.
34.
WilsonR., & KolanderC. (2011). Drug abuse prevention: A school and community partnership. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers.
