A Microcomputer System as a Tool for Research in Logical Thinking

Abstract

The use of Piagetian tasks to study logical thinking has continued at a high rate despite the fact that their inherent limitations reduce the probability of finding new knowledge. In this study a microcomputer system was programmed with Piagetian tasks in an attempt to gain advantages while avoiding the limitations of the original tasks. College students viewed tasks in the form of alphanumerics and graphics on a TV monitor and interacted with the tasks by way of a keyboard. All key depressions and times between depressions were recorded on floppy disks which were subsequently interfaced with the IBM/370 computer for data manipulation and analysis. After a two-year test and evaluation program, which involved 360 students in three experiments, these investigators found that the microcomputer system contained several advantages over the original Piagetian tasks and provided the researcher with many new alternatives in the study of logical thinking.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Hunt

J. McV.

, The Impact and Limitations of the Giant of Developmental Psychology, Studies in Cognitive Development, Elkind

and Flavell

(eds.), Oxford University Press, London, 1969.

Sigel

I. E.

and Hooper

F. H.

(eds.), Logical Thinking in Children: Research Based on Piaget's Theory, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, 1968.

Modgil

and Modgil

, Piagetian Research, NFER Publishing Company, Windsor, England, 1–8, 1976.

Ayers

J. D.

, Comments on Tuddenham's Paper, Theoretical Regularities and Individual Idiosyncracies, Piaget and Measurement, Green

D. R.

Ford

M. P.

, and Flamer

G. B.

(eds.), McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 75–80, 1971.

Pascual-Leone

, A Mathematical Model for the Transition Rule in Piaget's Developmental Stages, Acta Psychology, 30, pp. 301–345, 1970.

Case

, Structures and Strictures: Some Functional Limitations on the Course of Cognitive Growth, Cognitive Psychology, 6, pp. 544–573, 1974.

Inhelder

and Piaget

, The Growth of Logical Thinking From Childhood to Adolescence, Basic Books, New York, 1958.

Scardamalia

, Two Formal Operational Tasks: A Quantitative Neo-Piagetian and Task Analysis Model for Investigating Sources of Task Difficulty, Piagetian Theory and the Helping Professions, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, pp. 19–27, 1975.

Tyler

L. E.

, The Psychology of Individual Differences, Third Edition, Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, 1965.

10.

Friot

F. E.

, The Relationship Between an Inquiry Teaching Approach and Intellectual Development, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oklahoma, Norman, 1970.

11.

Fogelman

K. R.

, Piagetian Tests and Sex Differences-II, Educational Research, 2, pp. 154–155, 1972.

12.

Lawson

A. E.

, Sex Differences in Concrete and Formal Reasoning Ability as Measured by Manipulative Tasks and Written Tasks, Science Education, 3, pp. 397–405, 1975.

13.

Lawson

A. E.

, The Development and Validation of a Classroom Test of Formal Reasoning, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1, pp. 11–24, 1978.

14.

Davis

G. A.

, Psychology of Problem Solving, Basic Books, New York, p. 44, 1973.

15.

Bern

S. L.

, The Measurement of Psychological Androgyny, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 2, pp. 155–162, 1974.

16.

Dale

L. G.

, The Growth of Systematic Thinking: Replication and Analysis of Piaget's First Chemical Experiment, Australian Journal of Psychology, 22, pp. 277–286, 1970.