One-to-One Computing: What Does it Bring to Schools?

Abstract

This study investigates students' use of one-to-one laptops for various activities and the impact of one-to-one computing on student learning and school culture. Based on data collected from surveys and interviews of teachers, students, and parents in a Midwestern middle school over one academic year, this study answers the following major questions: 1) How did students use their laptops? 2) What impact did the one-to-one laptop program have on student learning and school culture? 3) What were the perceptions of and concerns over one-to-one computing? A sound understanding of these issues is increasingly important as more and more schools are joining in this one-to-one computing initiative and more money is being invested. Results revealed that students used their laptops for various tasks related to learning, communication, expression, and exploration. Students gained significantly in their technology proficiency. The one-to-one laptops have provided great opportunities and resources for teaching and learning, but also raised issues such as student discipline problems, concerns on digital literacy, and fear of over-dependency on information technology.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Association of School Librarians & Association for Educational Communications Technology. (1998). Information literacy standards for student learning. Retrieved June 7, 2008 from http://www.acrl.org/ala/aasl/aaslproftools/informationpower/InformationLiteracyStandards_final.pdf

Bahrampour

(2006). For some, laptops don't compute. Washington Post, December 9, 2006.

Bartels

(2000). Reflections on the RCDS Laptop Program after one year. Retrieved on February 2, 2006 from www.learningwithlaptops.org/files/Laptop%20Program%20Reflections.pdf

Bartels

(2002) Reflections on the RCDS Laptop Program after three years. Retrieved December 20, 2005 from http://www.learningwithlaptops.org/files/3rd%20Year%20Laptop%20Prog.pdf

Bebell

(2005). Technology promoting student excellence: An investigation of the first year of 1:1 computing in New Hampshire middle schools. Retrieved December 3, 2007 from http://www.iste.org/Content/NavigationMenu/Research/NECC_Research_Paper_Archives/NECC_2005/Bebell-Damian-NECC05.pdf

Bruce

B. C.

, & Hogan

M. P.

(1998). The disappearance of technology: Toward an ecological model of literacy. In Reinking

McKenna

M. C.

Labbo

L. D.

, & Kieffer

R. D.

(Eds.), Handbook of literacy and technology (pp. 269–281). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Bruce

B. C.

, & Levin

J. A.

(1997). Educational technology: Media for inquiry, communication, construction, and expression. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17(1), 79–102.

Burbules

, & Callister

Jr. (2000). Watch IT: The promises and risks of new information technologies for education. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

Bustamante

(2007). Romoland schools will no longer give each sixth-grader a laptop. Hemet News, May 9, 2007. Retrieved June 8, 2008 from http://www.pe.com/localnews/hemet/stories/PE_News_Local_D_laptops09.3e9b4dc.html

10.

Classroom For the Future. (2006). Classroom for the future. Retrieved October 14, 2007 from http://www.governor.state.pa/us/governor/lib/governor/classrooms_pointsfaq.pdf

11.

Committee on Information Technology Literacy & National Research Council. (1999). Being fluent with information technology. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

12.

Conway

P. F.

(2005). Laptops initiative for students with dyslexia or other reading and writing difficulties: Early implementation evaluation report. National Centre for Technology Education (NCTE), Ireland.

13.

Cuban

(2001). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

14.

Davis

Garas

Hopstock

Kellum

, & Stephenson

(2005). Henrico County Public Schools Ibook Survey Report. Development Associates, Arlington, VA.

15.

Dewey

(1943). The child and the curriculum: The school and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

16.

Dunleavy

Dexter

, & Heinecke

W. F.

(2007). What added value does a 1:1 student to laptop ratio bring to technology-supported teaching and learning? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(5), pp. 440–452.

17.

Dunsmoor

(2006). Learning with laptops. Retrieved on March 7, 2006 from http://www.keloland.com/News/NewsDetail5442.cfm?Id=0,44803

18.

eSchool News. (2006a). State laptop plan prompts mixed reaction. Retrieved June 8, 2008 from http://www.eschoolnews.com/news/top-news/index.cfm?i=36749&CFID=4218450&CFTOKEN=82756348

19.

eSchool News. (2006b). Top 10 ed-tech stories of 2006: eSN counts down the ten most significant educational technology stories of the past year. Retrieved June 8, 2008 from http://www.eschoolnews.com/news/showStory.cfm?ArticleID=6743&page=1

20.

Fox

(2005). Tracking U.S. trends. Education Week. Retrieved June 4, 2008 from http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2005/05/05/35tracking.h24.html

21.

Gee

J. P.

(2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. Palgrave Macmillan.

22.

Gulek

J. C.

, & Demirtas

(2005). Learning with technology: The impact of laptop use on student achievement. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 3(2).

23.

Harris

W. J.

, & Smith

(2004). Laptop use by seventh grade students with disabilities: Perceptions of special education teachers. Orono, ME: Maine Education Policy Research Institute, University of Maine Office.

24.

(2007). Seeing no progress, some schools drop laptops. The New York Times. Retrieved May 4, 2007 from http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/04/education/04laptop.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

25.

Jeroski

(2003). Wireless Writing Project. Research report: Phase II. School District #60—Peace River North. Retrieved in July 2004 from http://www.pm.bc.ca/Wireless_Writing_Program.html

26.

Jeroski

(2004). Implementation of the Wireless Writing Program: Phase 3. 2003–2004 Retrieved in July 2006 from http://www.pm.bc.ca/WWP_Report04.pdf

27.

Jeroski

(2005). Research Report: The Wireless Writing Program 2004–2005. Retrieved in July 2006 from http://www.pm.bc.ca/wwp2005.pdf

28.

Johnstone

(2003). Never mind the laptops: Kids, computers, and the transformation of learning. iUniverse Inc: Lincoln, Nebraska.

29.

Kerr

K. A.

Pane

J. F.

, & Barney

(2003). Quaker Valley Digital School District: Early effects and plans for future evaluation (Technical Report TR-107–EDU). Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation. Retrieved June 8, 2008 from http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/2004/RAND_TR107.pdf

30.

Lei

Conway

& Zhao

(2007). The digital pencil: One-to-one computing for children. London and New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

31.

Lei

, & Zhao

(2008). Computer uses and student achievement: A longitudinal study. Computers & Education, 49(2), pp. 284–296.

32.

Lemke

, & Martin

(2003). One-to-one computing in Maine: A state profile. Culver City, CA: Metiri Group. Retrieve on February 2, 2006 from http://www.k12blueprint.com/k12/blueprint/cd/ME-Profile.pdf

33.

Lemke

, & Martin

(2004a, March). One-to-one computing in Indiana—A state profile (preliminary report). Retrieved on February 2, 2006 from http://www.metiri.com/NSF-Study/INProfile.pdf

34.

Lemke

, & Martin

(2004b). One-to-one computing in Michigan: A state profile. Culver City, CA: Metiri Group. Retrieved October 17, 2007 from http://www.metiri.com/NSF-Study/MIProfile.pdf

35.

Lemke

, & Martin

(2004c). One-to-one computing in Virginia: A state profile. Culver City, CA: Metiri Group. Retrieved October 17, 2007 from http://www.metiri.com/NSF-Study/VAProfile.pdf

36.

Levin

J. A.

, & Bruce

B. C.

(2001). Technology as media: The learner centered perspective. Paper presented at the 2001 American Education Research Association Annual Conference, Seattle, Washington.

37.

Markoff

(2006). For $150, third-world laptop stirs big debate New York Time, November 30, 2006. Retrieved on November 30, 2006 from http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/30/technology/30laptop.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

38.

McFarlane

(1997). What are we and how did we get here? In McFarlane

(Ed.), Information technology and authentic learning: Realizing the potential of computers in the primary classroom. London and New York: Routledge.

39.

McMillan

, & Honey

(1993). Year one of project pulse: Pupils using laptops in science and English. A final report. New York: Bank Street College of Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 358 822.)

40.

NetDay. (2004). Voices and views of today's tech-savvy students. National report on Netday Speak Up Day for Students 2003. Retrieved on November 30, 2006 from http://www.tomorrow.org/speakup/pdfs/VOICES%20AND%20VIEWS%20final.pdf

41.

Penuel

W. R.

(2006). Implementation and effects of one-to-one computing initiatives: A research synthesis. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38, 329–348.

42.

Penuel

W. R.

Kim

D. Y.

Michalchik

Lewis

Means

Murphy

(2001). Using technology to enhance connections between home and school: A research synthesis. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.

43.

Prensky

(2006). “Don't bother me mom—I'm learning!” St. Paul, MN: Paragon House.

44.

Quality Education Data (QED). (2006). 2005–2006 National Technology Assessment http://www.qeddata.com/marketkno/researchreports/nta.aspx

45.

Quimby

(2007). Loving the Laptops. Portland Press Herald. Retrieved October 15, 2007 from http://www.maine.gov/mlte/articles/2007/pressherald/Loving_the_Laptops_05_21_07.pdf

46.

Rideout

V. J.

Foehr

U. G.

, & Roberts

D. F.

(2005). Generation M: Media in the lives of 8–18 year-olds. Washington, DC: A Kaiser Family Foundation Report. Available online at: http://www.kff.org/entmedia/index.cfm

47.

Rockman (1997). Report of a laptop program pilot: A project for anytime anywhere learning by Microsoft corporation notebooks for schools by Toshiba American information systems. Retrieved June 6, 2005 from http://www.csd.toshiba.com/cgi-bin/tais/su/su_sc_home.jsp

48.

Rockman (1998). Powerful tools for schooling: Second year study of the laptop program. Retrieved June 2005, from http://rockman.com/projects/laptop/laptop2exec.htm

49.

Rockman (1999). The laptop research study: Third year study of the laptop program [On-line]. Available http://www.microsoft.com/education/k12/aal

50.

Rockman (2000). A more complex picture: Laptop use and impact in the context of changing home and school access. The third in a series of research studies on Microsoft's Anytime Anywhere Learning Program. Retrieved on May 16, 2006 from http://cdgenp01.csd.toshiba.com/content/publicsector/edgov/year_three_rockman_study.pdf

51.

Rockman (2004). Kamehameha Schools Maui Laptop Project: Findings from classroom observations and teacher interviews. Retrieved on December 16, 2007 from http://www.rockman.com/projects/129.pase.maui/maui_laptop1_final.pdf

52.

Roschelle

(2003). Keynote paper: Unlocking the learning value of wireless mobile devices. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19, 260–272.

53.

Ross

S. M.

, & Strahl

J. D.

(2005). Evaluation of Michigan's Freedom To Learn Program. Retrieved August 7, 2007 from http://www.techlearning.com/techlearning/events/techforum06/LeslieWilson_MI_Evaluation_Brief.pdf

54.

Russell

Bebell

, & Higgins

(2004). Laptop learning: A comparison of teaching and learning in upper elementary classrooms equipped with shared carts of laptops and permanent 1:1 laptops. Boston: Technology and Assessment Study Collaborative, Boston College.

55.

Russell

O'Dwyer

, & Bebell

(2005). Methodological and psychometric challenges to evaluating 1:1 technology programs. Paper presented at American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting 2005, Montreal, Canada.

56.

Shifrin

(2006). Effect of media on children and adolescents: It's about time. Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Special Issue, Media and Children, 160, 448–450.

57.

Silvernail

D. L.

, & Harris

(2003). The Maine Learning Technology Initiative: Teacher, student, and school perspectives mid-year evaluation report. Maine Education Policy Research Institute http://www.usm.maine.edu/cepare/pdf/mlti/MLTI%20Mid%20Year%20Evaluation%20Report.pdf

58.

Silvernail

D. L.

, & Lane

D. M.

(2004). The impact of Maine's one-to-one laptop program on middle school teachers and students (Report #1). Gorham, ME: Maine Education Policy Research Institute, University of Southern Maine Office. Retrieved June 8, 2008 from http://mainegov-images.informe.org/mlte/articles/research/MLTIPhaseOneEvaluationReport2004.pdf

59.

South Dakota Department of Education. (2007). More high school students to get laptops. Retrieved on March 30, 2007 from http://doe.sd.gov/pressroom/news.asp?ID-97

60.

Stevenson

(1999). Evaluation report—Year 3 middle school laptop program. Retrieved March 30, 2006 from http://www.beaufort.k12.sc.us/district/evalreport3.htm

61.

Tapscott

(1998). Growing up digital. The rise of the net generation. New York: McGraw-Hill.

62.

Technology Immersion Project (TIP). (n.d.). http://www.txtip.info/pages/2/index.htm

63.

The Technology Immersion Project. (n.d.). Six components of technology immersion. Retrieved June 7, 2008 from http://www.txtip.info/aboutimmersion/sixcomponents.html

64.

Urban-Lurain

, & Zhao

(2004). Freedom to learn evaluation report: 2003 project implementation. Retrieved June 2005, from www.hflcsd.org/ftlsummary.pdf

65.

U.S. Department of Education Office of Educational Technology. (2006). Freedom to learn. Retrieved June 7, 2008 from http://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/os/technology/plan/2004/site/stories/edlite-Lansing.html#budget

66.

Vascellaro

J. E.

(2006). Saying no to school laptops. The Wall Street Journal, August 31, 2006.

67.

Warschauer

(2006). Laptops and literacy: Learning in the wireless classroom. New York: Teacher's College Press.

68.

Young

J. R.

(2005). MIT researchers unveil a $100 laptop designed to benefit children worldwide. The Chronicle of Higher Education 11/25/2005.

69.

Zucker

, & McGhee

(2005). A study of one-to-one computer use in mathematics and science instruction at the secondary level in Henrico County public schools. Retrieved June 8, 2008 from http://www.ubiqcomputing.org/FinalReport.pdf