Measures of Quality in Online Education: An Investigation of the Community of Inquiry Model and the Net Generation

Abstract

The goal of this article is to present and validate an instrument that reflects the Community of Inquiry Model (Garrison, Anderson, & Archer, 2000, 2001) and inquire into whether the instrument and the model it reflects explain variation in levels of student learning and satisfaction with online courses in a higher education context. Additionally this study sought to examine the effects of two other variables—age and students' registration status—on levels of satisfaction and learning in online courses. The issue of age and the “net generation” has generated considerable interest recently with a number of contradictory predictions made for younger students engaged in text-based, technology-mediated learning environments. Previous research indicates that student registration status serves as a relatively reliable predictor of commitment to degree and likely persistence in higher education (Horn & Neville, 2006)—does commitment to degree predict satisfaction and likely persistence with online learning in the same manner? We sought to inquire into the amount of variance these variables predict relative to constructs in the Community of Inquiry Framework. Results indicated that the instrument provides a coherent factor structure that reflects the Community of Inquiry Model. Other findings provide new insight into additional variables that account for variation in students' satisfaction, reported learning, and cognitive presence in text-based, asynchronous online environments.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allen

E. I.

, & Seaman

(2006). Growing by degrees: Online education in the United States. Needham, MA: Sloan Center for Online Learning in Education (SCOLE).

Arbaugh

J. B.

(2007). An empirical verification of the community of inquiry framework. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 11(1), 73–86.

Arbaugh

J. B.

, & Hwang

(2006). Does “teaching presence” exist in online MBA courses? The Internet and Higher Education, 9(1), 9–21.

Bakhtin

M. M.

(1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays by M. M. Bakhtin. Holquist

(Ed.), Emerson

& Holquist

(Trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.

Berge

S. L.

(1995). Facilitating computer conferencing: Recommendations from the field. Educational Technology, 15(1), 22–30.

Brown

J. S.

(2002). Growing up digital. United States Distance Learning Journal, 16(2), 15–28.

Bradburn

E. M.

(2002). Short-Term Enrollment in Postsecondary Education (NCES 2003–153), U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC.

Carbonaro

Dawber

, & Arav

(2006). A comparison of students' performance under full-time, part-time, and online conditions in an undergraduate nursing microbiology course. Journal of Distance Education, 21(1), 51–61.

Clark

(2001). Virtual schools: Status and trends. Phoenix, AZ: WestEd. Retrieved 9/20/2007 from http://www.wested.org/online_pubs/virtualschools.pdf

10.

Clark

H. H.

, & Krych

M. A.

(2004). Speaking while monitoring addressees for understanding. Journal of Memory and Language, 50(1), 62–81.

11.

Commission on the Humanities. (1980). The humanities in American life: Report of the Commission on the Humanities. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

12.

Culnan

M. J.

, & Markus

M. L.

(1987). Information technologies. In Jablin

F. M.

(Ed.), Handbook of organizational communication, (pp. 420–443). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

13.

Daft

R. L.

Lengel

R. H.

, & Trevino

L. K.

(1987). Message equivocality, media selection, and manager performance: Implications for information systems. MIS Quarterly, 11(3), 354–366.

14.

Dennis

A. R.

, & Kinney

S. T.

(1998). Testing media richness theory in the new media: The effects of cues, feedback and task equivocality. Information Systems Research, 9(3), 256–274.

15.

Dewey

(1897). My pedagogic creed. School Journal, 54, 77–80.

16.

Dewey

(1910). How we think. Boston: D. C. Heath and Co.

17.

Dziuban

Moskal

, & Futch

(2007). Reactive behavior, ambivalence, and the generations: Emerging patterns in student evaluation of blended learning. In Picciano

A. G.

& Dziuban

C. D.

(Eds.), Blended learning: Research perspectives (pp. 179–202). Needham, MA: Sloan Center for Online Education.

18.

Fletcher

(2005). Self-efficacy as an evaluation measure for programs in support of online learning literacies for undergraduates. Internet & Higher Education, 8(4), 307–322.

19.

Fulk

Schmitz

, & Steinfield

C. W.

(1990). A social influence model of technology use. In Fulk

& Steinfield

(Eds.), Organizations and communication technology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

20.

Garrison

D. R.

Anderson

, & Archer

(2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 1–19.

21.

Garrison

D. R.

Anderson

, & Archer

(2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. The American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7–23.

22.

Garrison

, & Arbaugh

(2007). Researching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions. Internet and Higher Education, 10, 157–172.

23.

Garrison

D. R.

, & Cleveland-Innes

, (2005). Facilitating cognitive presence in online learning: Interaction is not enough. American Journal of Distance Education, 19(3), 133–148.

24.

Garrison

D. R.

Cleveland-Innes

, & Fung

(2004). Student role adjustment in online communities of inquiry: Model and instrument validation. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 8(2): 61–74.

25.

Gee

J. P.

(2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

26.

Gee

J. P.

(2005). Why video games are good for your soul. Australia: Common Ground Publishing.

27.

Horn

, & Nevill

(2006). Profile of Undergraduates in U.S. Postsecondary Education Institutions: 2003–04: With a Special Analysis of Community College Students (NCES 2006–184). U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

28.

Hoskins

, & van Hoof

(2005). Motivation and ability: Which students use online learning and what influence does it have on their achievement? British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(2), 177–192.

29.

Ice

Arbaugh

Diaz

Garrison

Richardson

Shea

(2007a). Community of Inquiry Framework: Validation and Instrument Development. Paper presented at the 13th Annual Sloan-C International Conference on Online Learning, Orlando, FL.

30.

Ice

Curtis

Phillips

, & Wells

(2007b). Using asynchronous audio feedback to enhance teaching presence and student sense of community. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 11(2), 3–25.

31.

Ircink-Waite

R. M.

(1989). A measurement of critical thinking in senior baccalaureate nursing students. Dissertation Abstracts International, 50(11), 3464A.

32.

Johnson

I. Y.

(2006). Analysis of dropout behavior at a public research university: The multi-spell discrete-time approach. Research in Higher Education, 47(8), 905–935.

33.

Kamin

C. S.

O'Sullivan

Deterding

R. R.

Younger

, & Wade

(2006). A case study of teaching presence in virtual problem-based learning groups. Medical Teacher, 28(5), 425–428.

34.

Kraut

R. E.

Gergle

, & Fussell

S. R.

(2002). The use of visual information in shared visual spaces: Informing the development of virtual co-presence. Proceedings of the 2002 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work (pp. 31–40). Association for Computing Machinery.

35.

Kuh

G. D.

(2003). What we're learning about student engagement from NSSE: Benchmarks for effective educational practices. Change, 35(2), 24–32.

36.

Markus

L. M.

(1994). Electronic mail as the medium of managerial choice. Organization Science, 5(4), 502–527.

37.

Marti

C. N.

(2008). Latent postsecondary persistence pathways: Educational pathways in American two-year colleges. Research in Higher Education, 49, 317–336.

38.

Newman

Stein

, & Trask

(2003). What can virtual learning do for your school? Boston, MA: Eduventures.

39.

Oblinger

, & Oblinger

(2005). Educating the net generation. EDUCAUSE. Downloaded 9/22/07 from http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/pub7101.pdf

40.

Picciano

, & Seaman

(2007). K-12 online learning: A survey of U.S. school district administrators. Needham, MA: The Sloan Consortium.

41.

Prensky

(2003). e-Nough! “e-Learning” is a misnomer—it's mostly just “e-Teaching.” On The Horizon, 11(1), 26–32.

42.

Prensky

(2005). Engage me or enrage me: What today's learners demand. EDUCAUSE Review, 40(5), 60–65.

43.

Richardson

, & Newby

(2006). The Role of students' cognitive engagement in online learning. The American Journal of Distance Education, 20,(1), 23–37.

44.

Richardson

, & Swan

(2003). Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students' perceived learning and satisfaction. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(1), retrieved from http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/jaln/v7n1/v7n1_richardson.asp

45.

Salamonson

, & Lantz

(2005). Factors influencing nursing students' preference for a hybrid format delivery in a pathophysiology course. Nurse Education Today, 25(1), 9–16.

46.

Shea

C. S.

, & Pickett

(2006). A study of teaching presence and student sense of learning community in fully online and web-enhanced college courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 9, 175–190.

47.

Shea

C. S.

Swan

, & Pickett

(2005). Developing learning community in online asynchronous college courses: The role of teaching presence. The Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 9(4), 59–82.

48.

Shea

Pickett

, & Pelz

(2003). A follow-up investigation of teaching presence in the SUNY Learning Network. The Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(2), 61–80.

49.

Short

Williams

, & Christie

(1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. New York: Wiley.

50.

Stein

D. S.

Wanstreet

C. E.

Glazer

H. R.

Engle

C. L.

Harris

R. A.

Johnston

S. M.

(2007). Creating shared understanding through chats in a community of inquiry. Internet & Higher Education, 10(2), 103–115.

51.

Swan

(2003). Developing social presence in online discussions. In Naidu

(Ed.), Learning and teaching with technology: Principles and practices (pp. 147–164). London: Kogan Page.

52.

Swan

, & Shih

L. F.

(2005). On the nature and development of social presence in online course discussions. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 9(3), 115–136.

53.

Tabachnick

, & Fidell

(2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

54.

Theil

(2008, August 9). Tune in tomorrow: The boom in online education. Newsweek. Retrieved September 5, 2008, from http://www.newsweek.com/id/151688

55.

Tinto

(1997). Classrooms as communities—Exploring the educational character of student persistence. Journal of Higher Education, 68(6), 599–623.

56.

U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2003). Distance Education at Degree-Granting Postsecondary Institutions: 2000–2001, NCES 2003–017, Washington, DC.

57.

U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2006). The Condition of Education 2006, NCES 2006–071, Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. U.S. Dept of Education. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/2006/pdf/09_2006.pdf

58.

Umbach

, & Wawrzynski

(2005). Faculty do matter: The role of college faculty in student learning and engagement. Research in Higher Education, 46, 153–184.

59.

Vaughan

, & Garrison

D. R.

(2005). Creating cognitive presence in a blended faculty development community. Internet & Higher Education, 8(1), 1–12.

60.

Walther

J. B.

, & Parks

M. R.

(2002). Cues filtered out, cues filtered in: Computer-mediated communication and relationships. In Knapp

M. L.

& Daly

J. A.

(Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

61.

Wertsch

(2002). Computer mediation, PBL, and dialogicality. Distance Education, 23(1), 105–108.

62.

Wilson

B. G.

Ludwig-Hardman

Thornam

C. L.

, & Dunlap

J. C.

(2004). Bounded community: Designing and facilitating learning communities in formal courses. International Review of Research in Open & Distance Learning; 5(3), 1–19.

63.

Wise

Chang

, & Duffy

(2004). The effects of teacher social presence on student satisfaction, engagement, and learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 31(3), 247–271.

64.

Zhao

, & Kuh

(2004). Adding value: Learning communities and student engagement. Research in Higher Education, 45, 115–138.