Information Systems in Teacher Preparation Programs: What Can we Learn from A 5-Year Longitudinal Case Study of an Electronic Portfolio Database?

Abstract

In 2003, a portfolio system was implemented to manage the data associated with the field experiences in a teacher education program at a research institution in the southeast region of the United States. In this longitudinal study, the implementation trends from usage data extracted from the system are used to discuss the implications for the use of the system in terms of how it “fits” within the organizational structure. This analysis is framed by concepts related to the implementation of Management Information Systems (Markus & Robey, 1988) and diffusion of innovation (Rogers, 2003). Findings suggest that decentralized environments result in higher degrees of reinvention.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson

R. S.

, & DeMeulle

(1998). Portfolio use in twenty-four teacher education programs. Teacher Education Quarterly, 25(1), 23–31.

Baston

(2002,). The electronic portfolio boom: What's it all about? Retrieved July 7, 2009, from http://www.campustechnology.com/Articles/2002/11/The-Electronic-Portfolio-Boom-Whats-it-All-About.aspx

Beishuizen

Van Boxel

Banyard

Twiner

Vermeij

, & Underwood

(2006). The Introduction of portfolios in higher education: A comparative study in the UK and the Netherlands. European Journal of Education, 41(3), 491–508.

Chambers

, & Wickersham

L. E.

(2007). Electronic portfolio journey: A year later. Education, 127(1), 351–360.

Fullan

M. G.

(1991). The new meaning of educational change. London: Cassell Educational Limited.

Gibson

, & Barrett

(2003). Directions in electronic portfolio development. Contemporary issues in technology and teacher education, 2(4). Retrieved September 8, 2008, from http://www.citejournal.org/vol2/iss4/general/article3.cfm

Hallman

(2007). Negotiating teacher identity: Exploring the use of electronic teaching portfolios with preservice English teachers. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 50(6), 474–485.

Lehman

J. D.

Richardson

Bai

, & White

(2003). Connections in teacher education: Lessons from electronic portfolios, videoconferencing, and distance field experiences. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, Illinois.

Markus

M. L.

(1983). Power, politics and MIS implementation. Communications of the ACM, 26(6), 430–444.

10.

Marcus

M. L.

, & Robey

(1988). Information technology and organizational change: Causal structure in theory and research. Management Science, 34(5), 583–598.

11.

Naizer

G. L.

(1997). Validity and reliability issues of performance-portfolio assessment. Action in Teacher Education, 18(4), 1–9.

12.

Patton

M. Q.

(2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

13.

Reis

N. K.

, & Villaume

S. K.

(2002). The benefits, tensions, and visions of portfolios as a wide-scale assessment for teacher education. Action in Teacher Education, 23(4), 10–17.

14.

Rogers

E. M.

(2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: The Free Press.

15.

Schneberger

, & Jost

(1994). Educational technology adoption: An information systems perspective. Proceedings of Selected Research and Development Presentations at the 1994 National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology. ERIC Document No. ED373759.

16.

Simmons

(1996). Control the purpose, not the contents: Coaching the creation of teaching portfolios. Action in Teacher Education, 18(1), 71–81.

17.

Strudler

, & Wetzel

(2005). The diffusion of electronic portfolios in teacher education: Issues of initiation and implementation. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 37(4), 411–433.

18.

Strudler

, & Wetzel

(2008). Costs and benefits of electronic portfolios in teacher education: Faculty perspectives. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 24(4), 135–141.

19.

Wetzel

, & Strudler

(2005). The diffusion of electronic portfolios in teacher education: Next steps and recommendations from accomplished users. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(2), 231–243.

20.

Wilhelm

Puckett

Beisser

Wishart

Merideth

, & Sivakumaran

(2006). Lessons learned from the implementation at three universities. Tech Trends, 50(4), 62–71.

21.

Zidon

(1996). Portfolios in preservice teacher education: What the students say. Action in Teacher Education, 18(1), 59–70.