College students are using social network sites such as Facebook to communicate with their families and friends. However, empirical evidence is needed to examine whether there exists a reciprocal relationship between students' use of social network sites and their psychological well-being. The present study focused on two reciprocally-related research questions: (a) Is there an impact of loneliness on Facebook intensity and motive for using Facebook among first-year college students? (b) Is there an impact of Facebook intensity and motive for using Facebook on loneliness? Data were collected from a sample of 340 first-year college students and were analyzed through structural equation modeling. No reciprocal relationship was found in the study: Facebook intensity had a positive impact on loneliness and, motive for using Facebook did not have any impact on loneliness, whereas loneliness influenced neither Facebook intensity nor motive for using Facebook.
AntheunisM. L.ValkenburgP. M.PeterJ. (2010). Getting acquainted through social network sites: Testing a model of online uncertainty reduction and social attraction. Computers in Human Behavior, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2009.07.005
3.
ArnettJ. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55, 469–480.
4.
ArnettJ. J. (2006). Emerging adulthood: Understanding the new way of coming of age. In ArnettJ. J.TannerJ. L. (Eds.), Emerging adults in America: Coming of age in the 21st century (pp. 3–19). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
5.
BollenK. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
6.
BrennerV. (1997). Psychology of computer use: XLVII. Parameters of Internet use, abuse, and addiction: The first 90 days of the Internet usage survey. Psychological Reports, 80, 878–882.
7.
ByrneB. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
8.
CaponeC.WoodM. D.BorsariB.LairdR. D. (2007). Fraternity and sorority involvement, social influences, and alcohol use among college students: A prospective examination. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 21, 316–327.
9.
DonathJ.BoydD. (2004). Public displays of connection. BT Technology Journal, 22, 71–82.
10.
EllisonN.SteinfieldC.LampeC. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends”: Exploring the relationship between college students' use of online social networks and social capital. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, article 1. Retrieved January 25, 2008 from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol12/issue4/ellison.html
11.
FanW.Yan. (2010). Factors affecting response rates of the web survey: A systematic review. Computers in Human Behaviors26(2), 132–139.
12.
HamiltonS. F.HamiltonM. A. (2006). School, work, and emerging adulthood. In ArnettJ. J.TannerJ. L. (Eds.), Emerging adults in America: Coming of age in the 21st century (pp. 257–278). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
13.
HartupW. W.StevensN. (1997). Friendships and adaptation in the life course. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 355–370.
14.
HoltgrenS. M. (2007). College students' perceptions of the effects of the Internet on their experiences of community at a Christian liberal arts college. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 68(4-A), 1423.
15.
HsuC. W.WangC. C.TaiY. T. (2011). The closer the relationship, the more interaction on Facebook? Investigating the case of Taiwan users. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(7–8), 473–476.
16.
JacksonT.SoderlindA.WeissK. E. (2000). Personality traits and quality of relationships as predictors of future loneliness among American college students. Social Behavior and Personality28, 463–470.
17.
JaegerR. M. (1984). Sampling in education and the social sciences. New York: Longman.
18.
LivingstoneS. (2008). Taking risky opportunities in youthful content creation: Teenagers' use of social networking sites for intimacy, privacy and self-expression. New Media & Society, 10, 393–411.
19.
McKennaK. Y. A.BarghJ. A. (1999). Causes and consequences of social interaction on the Internet: A conceptual framework. Media Psychology, 1, 249–269.
20.
McKennaK. Y. A.GreenA. S.GleasonM. E. J. (2002). Relationship formation on the Internet: What's the big attraction?Journal of Social Issues, 58, 9–31.
21.
NicponM. F.HuserL.BlankE. H.SollenbergerS.BefortC.KurpiusS. E. R. (2006). The relationship of loneliness and social support with college's freshmen academic performance and persistence. Journal of College Student Retention, 8, 345–358.
22.
OswaldD. L.ClarkE. M. (2003). Best friends forever? High school best friendships and the transition to college. Personal Relationships, 10, 187–196.
23.
ParksM. R. (2011). Boundary conditions for the application of three theories of computer-mediated communication to MySpace. Journal of Communication, 61(4), 557–574.
24.
PritchardM. E.WilsonG. S.YamnitzB. (2007). What predicts adjustment among college students? A longitudinal panel study. Journal of American College Health, 56, 15–21.
25.
RubinA. M. (2002). The uses-and-gratifications perspective of media effects. In BryantJ.ZillmanD. (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 525–548). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
26.
RussellD. (1996). The UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3): Reliability, validity, and factor structure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 66, 20–40.
27.
SteinfieldC.EllisonN. B.LampeC. (2008). Social capital, self-esteem, and use of online social network sites: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29, 434–445.
28.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
29.
ValkenburgP.PeterJ.SchoutenA. P. (2006). Friend networking sites and their relationship to adolescents' well-being and social self-esteem. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 9, 84–90.
30.
WaltersS. T.VaderA. M.HarrisT. R. (2007). A controlled trial of web-based feedback for heavy drinking college students. Prevention Science, 8, 83–88.
