Analysis of Learning Behavior in Problem-Solving-Based and Project-Based Discussion Activities within the Seamless Online Learning Integrated Discussion (SOLID) System
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online July, 2013
Analysis of Learning Behavior in Problem-Solving-Based and Project-Based Discussion Activities within the Seamless Online Learning Integrated Discussion (SOLID) System
Both asynchronous and synchronous discussions have advantages and limitations for online learning. This study conducts an empirical analysis of these discussion activities while applying the proposed Seamless Online Learning Integrated Discussion (SOLID) system, which can instantly integrate Facebook's asynchronous discussion function with the MSN Messenger's synchronous discussion function. This study examines two teaching activities (a problem-solving-based activity and a project-based discussion activity) within the SOLID system and compares their differences in knowledge construction phases and cognitive dimensions via a quantitative content analysis and lag sequential analysis. The results show that both cognitive and knowledge construction dimensions exhibit a higher diversity of interaction in the project-based activity than in the problem-solving-based activity. In addition, based on the results of the research, this study offers, as reference, recommendations to instructors and researchers for the implementation of online discussion activities.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersonL. W.KrathwohlD. R. (2001). A Taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. New York, NY: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
2.
AsterhanC. S. C.EisenmannT. (2011). Introducing synchronous e-discussion tools in co-located classrooms: A study on the experiences of “active” and “silent” secondary school students. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 2169–2177.
3.
BakemanR.GottmanJ. M. (1997). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis (2nd ed.). London, UK: Cambridge University Press.
4.
ChanT. W.HueC. W.ChouC. Y.TzengO. J. L. (2001). Four spaces of network learning models. Computer & Education, 37, 141–161.
5.
CheungW. S.HewK. F. (2010). Using asynchronous online discussion in education: Lessons learned over the last ten years. Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2010 (pp. 279–282). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
6.
CobbP.WoodT.YackelE. (1991). A constructivist approach to second grade mathematics. In von GlasersfeldE. (Ed.), Radical constructivism in mathematics education. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
7.
De SmetM.Van KeerH.ValckeM. (2008). Blending asynchronous discussion groups and peer tutoring in higher education: An exploratory study of online peer tutoring behaviour. Computers & Education, 50(1), 207–223.
8.
GunawardenaC.LoweC.AndersonT. (1997). Analysis of global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17(4), 397–431.
9.
HewK. (2011). Students' and teachers' use of Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 662–676.
10.
HiltzS. R.TuroffM. (2002). What makes learning networks effective?Communications of the ACM, 45(4), 56–59.
11.
HouH. T. (2010). Exploring the behavioural patterns in project-based learning with online discussion: Quantitative content analysis and progressive sequential analysis. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9(3), 52–60.
12.
HouH. T. (2011). A case study of online instructional collaborative discussion activities for problem solving using situated scenarios: An examination of content and behavior cluster analysis. Computers and Education, 56(3), 712–719.
13.
HouH. T. (2012). Analyzing the learning process of an online role-playing discussion activity. Educational Technology & Society, 15(1), 211–222.
14.
HouH. T.ChangK. E.SungY. T. (2007). An analysis of peer assessment online discussions within a course that uses project-based learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 15(3), 237–251.
15.
HouH. T.SungY. T.ChangK. E. (2008). Exploring the behavioral patterns of an online knowledge sharing discussion activity among teachers with problem-solving strategy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(1), 101–108.
16.
HouH. T.WuS. Y. (2011). Analyzing the social knowledge construction behavioral patterns of an online synchronous collaborative discussion instructional activity using an instant messaging tool: A case study. Computers & Education, 57, 1459–1468.
HuangS. L.YangC. W. (2009). Designing a semantic bliki system to support different types of knowledge and adaptive learning. Computers & Education, 53(3), 701–712.
19.
JeongA. C. (2003). The sequential analysis of group interaction and critical thinking in online threaded discussions. American Journal of Distance Education, 17(1), 25–43.
20.
JinL.WenZ.GoughN. (2010). Social virtual worlds for technology-enhanced learning on an augmented learning platform. Learning, Media and Technology, 35(2), 139–153.
21.
JohnsonG. (2008). The relative learning benefits of synchronous and asynchronous text-based discussion. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(1), 166–169.
22.
JohnsonK. A. (2011). The effect of Twitter posts on students' perceptions of instructor credibility. Learning, Media and Technology, 36(1), 21–38.
23.
JonesB. F.RasmussenC. M.MoffittM. C. (1997). Real-life problem solving: A collaborative approach to interdisciplinary learning. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
24.
KanukaH.RourkeL.LaflammeE. (2007). The influence of instructional methods on the quality of online discussion. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(2), 260–271.
25.
KohH. L.HerringS. C.HewK. F. (2010). Project-based learning and student knowledge construction during asynchronous online discussion. The Internet and Higher Education, 13, 284–291.
26.
LiuC. Y.YangS. C. (2012). Applying the practical inquiry model to investigate the quality of students' online discourse in an information ethics course based on Bloom's teaching goal and Bird's 3C model. Computers and Education, 59(2), 466–480.
27.
LuppiciniR. (Ed.). (2007). Online learning communities. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
28.
MaL.WhittierD. (2010). How faculty's satisfaction with teaching online relates to synchronous/asynchronous communication. In GibsonD.DodgeB. (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2010 (pp. 683–687). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
29.
MadgeC.MeekJ.WellensJ.HooleyT. (2009). Facebook, social integration and informal learning at university: “It is more for socialising and talking to friends about work than for actually doing work.”Learning, Media and Technology, 34(2), 141–155.
30.
MazmanS. G.UsluelY. K. (2010). Modeling educational usage of Facebook. Computers & Education, 55(2), 444–453.
31.
RourkeL.AndersonT. (2004). Validity in quantitative content analysis. Educational Technology Research & Development, 52(1), 5–18.
32.
SchellensT.ValckeM. (2005). Collaborative learning in asynchronous discussion groups: What about the impact on cognitive processing?Computers in Human Behavior, 21, 957–975.
33.
SelwynN.OliverM. (2011). Learning, media and technology: Looking backwards and moving forward. Learning, Media and Technology, 36(1), 1–3.
34.
ŞendagS.OdabaşiH. F. (2009). Effects of an online problem based learning course on content knowledge acquisition and critical thinking skills. Computers & Education, 53, 132–141.
35.
ThomasJ. W. (2000). A review of research on project-based leaming. San Rafael, CA: Autodesk Foundation.
36.
ThomasJ. W.MergendollerJ. R.MichaelsonA. (1999). Project-based learning: A handbook for middle and high school teachers. Novato, CA: The Buck Institute for Education.
37.
ValckeM.WeverB. D.ZhuC.DeedC. (2009). Supporting active cognitive processing in collaborative groups: The potential of Bloom's taxonomy as a labeling tool. The Internet and Higher Education, 12(3–4), 165–172.
38.
WuS. Y.HouH. T.HwangW. Y.LiuZ. F. (2011, May 29–31). A case study of seamless online learning integrated discussion. Paper presented at The 15th Global Chinese Conference on Computers in Education (GCCCE 2011), Hangzhou, China.
39.
WuS. Y.WangS. T.LiuE. Z. F.HuD. C.HwangW. Y. (2012). The influences of social self-efficacy on social trust and social capital—A case study of Facebook. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(2), 246–254.
