Applying Computerized Concept Maps in Guiding Pupils to Reason and Solve Mathematical Problems: The Design Rationale and Effect

Abstract

The capability of solving fundamental mathematical problems is essential to elementary school students; however instruction based on ordinary narration usually perplexes students. Concept mapping is well known for its effectiveness on assimilating and organizing knowledge, which is essential to meaningful learning. A variety of concept map-based instruction and assessment methods and software tools have been successfully applied to improve learning in diverse disciplines. This article presents a software tool that applies concept mapping and aims to train students in analyzing mathematical problems precisely and then solving them correctly. Additionally, an experiment investigating the tool's impact on children's capability of solving mathematical problems is reported. The experiment revealed that incorporating concept maps into the instruction process can successfully strengthen students' ability of reasoning and solving mathematical problems. Besides the quantitative analysis, an interview reflected that most students were inclined to use the tool as well as the approach that instructed learners how to reason and solve mathematical problems.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ausbrooks

Buswell

Carlisle

Chavchanidze

Dalmas

Devitt

(2010). Mathematical Markup Language (MathML). Retrieved August 31, 2011, from http://www.w3.org/TR/MathML3

Bolte

L. A.

(1999). Using concept maps and interpretive essays for assessment in mathematics. School Science and Mathematics, 99(1), 19–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.1999.tb17442.x

Bromley

Modlo

(1995). Graphic organizers. Jefferson City, MO: Scholastic Professional Books.

Buldu

(2010). Concept mapping as a formative assessment in college classrooms: Measuring usefulness and student satisfaction. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 2099–2104.

Chadha

Kinchin

I. M.

Kokotailo

(2008). Using PowerPoint as a lens to focus on linearity in teaching. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 32, 333–346.

Chu

R. J.-C.

(2010). How family support and Internet self-efficacy influence the effects of e-learning among higher aged adults—Analyses of gender and age differences. Computers & Education, 55(1), 255–264.

Cohen

(1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge Academic.

Daley

B. J.

Conceição

Mina

Altman

B. A.

Baldor

Brown

(2008). Advancing concept map research: A review of 2004 and 2006 CMC research. Paper presented at the The Third International Conference on Concept Mapping, Helsinki, Finland.

Hampton

N. Z.

Mason

(2003). Learning disabilities, gender, sources of efficacy, self-efficacy beliefs, and academic achievement in high school students. Journal of School Psychology, 41(2), 101–112.

10.

Hicks-Moore

S. L.

(2005). Clinical concept maps in nursing education: An effective way to link theory and practice. Nurse Education in Practice, 5(6), 348–352.

11.

Hoeft

R. M.

Jentsch

F. G.

Harper

M. E.

Evans

A. W.

Bowers

C. A.

Salas

(2003). TPL-KATS—Concept map: A computerized knowledge assessment tool. Computers in Human Behavior, 19(6), 653–657.

12.

Ingec

S. K.

(2009). Analysing concept maps as an assessment tool in teaching physics and comparison with the achievement tests. International Journal of Science Education, 31(14), 1897–1915.

13.

Kinchin

I. M.

Cabot

L. B.

(2010). Reconsidering the dimensions of expertise: From linear stages towards dual processing. London Review of Education, 8(2), 153–166.

14.

Lapp

D. A.

Nyman

M. A.

Berry

J. S.

(2010). Student connections of linear algebra concepts: An analysis of concept maps. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science & Technology, 41(1), 1–18.

15.

Liu

T.-C.

Lin

Y.-C.

Tsai

C.-C.

(2009). Identifying senior high school students' misconceptions about statistical correlation, and their possible causes: An exploratory study using concept mapping with interviews. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(4), 791–820. doi: 10.1007/s10763-008-9142-y

16.

Marangos

Alley

(2007). Effectiveness of concept maps in economics: Evidence from Australia and USA. Learning and Individual Differences, 17(2), 193–199.

17.

Murray

T. S.

Owen

McGaw

(2005). Learning a living—First results of the adult literacy and life skills survey. Retrieved August 21, 2011, from http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/44/7/34867438.pdf

18.

Novak

J. D.

(1991). Clarify with concept maps. The Science Teacher, 58, 45–49.

19.

Novak

J. D.

Gowin

D. B.

(1984). Learning how to learn. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

20.

Öçal

M. F.

Güler

(2010). Pre-service mathematics teachers' views about proof by using concept maps. Paper presented at the Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences. Available at https://www-sciencedirect-com.web.bisu.edu.cn/science/article/pii/S1877042810022627

21.

Okebukola

P. A.

(1992). Can good concept mappers be good problem solvers in science? Educational Psychology, 12(2), 113.

22.

Özmen

Demrcioǧlu

Coll

(2009). A comparative study of the effects of a concept mapping enhanced laboratory experience on Turkish high school students? Understanding of acid-base chemistry. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(1), 1–24. doi: 10.1007/s10763-007-9087-6

23.

Powell

S. R.

Fuchs

L. S.

Fuchs

Cirino

P. T.

Fletcher

J. M.

(2009). Do word-problem features differentially affect problem difficulty as a function of students' mathematics difficulty with and without reading difficulty? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42(2), 99–110.

24.

Ryve

(2004). Can collaborative concept mapping create mathematically productive discourses? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 56(2/3), 157–177.

25.

Schaal

(2010). Cognitive and motivational effects of digital concept maps in pre-service science teacher training. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 640–647.

26.

Serhan

Syam

(2011). Using concept maps as an instructional tool in calculus. International Journal of Instructional Media, 38(1), 79–85.

27.

Tzeng

J.-Y.

(2010). Designs of concept maps and their impacts on readers' performance in memory and reasoning while reading. Journal of Research in Reading, 33(2), 128–147.

28.

Van Steenbrugge

Valcke

Desoete

(2010). Mathematics learning difficulties in primary education: Teachers' professional knowledge and the use of commercially available learning packages. Educational Studies, 36(1), 59–71.

29.

Vukovic

R. K.

Lesaux

N. K.

Siegel

L. S.

(2010). The mathematics skills of children with reading difficulties. Learning & Individual Differences, 20(6), 639–643.

30.

Vukovic

R. K.

Siegel

L. S.

(2010). Academic and cognitive characteristics of persistent mathematics difficulty from first through fourth grade. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 25(1), 25–38.

31.

Wecker

Kohnle

Fischer

(2007). Computer literacy and inquiry learning: When geeks learn less. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(2), 133–144. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00218.x

32.

Wilhelm

(2009). Gender differences in lunar-related scientific and mathematical understandings. International Journal of Science Education, 31(15), 2105–2122.

33.

Williams

C. G.

(1998). Using concept maps to assess conceptual knowledge of function. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29(4), 414.

34.

P.-H.

Hwang

G.-J.

Milrad

H.-R.

Huang

Y.-M.

(2012). An innovative concept map approach for improving students' learning performance with an instant feedback mechanism. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(2), 217–232. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01167.x

35.

Zan

Brown

Evans

Hannula

(2006). Affect in mathematics education: An introduction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63(2), 113–121. doi: 10.1007/s10649-006-9028-2