Three different versions of a learning program on trigonometry were compared, a program controlled, non-interactive version (CG), an interactive, conflict inducing version (EG 1), and an interactive one which was supposed to reduce the occurrence of a cognitive conflict regarding the central problem solution (EG 2). Pupils (N = 101) of a “Realschule” all aged 16 or 17, took part in the study. The pupils were assigned to the three groups by chance. Before the learning session, the pupils' prior knowledge and numeric processing capacity was tested. During the learning session (about 45 minutes) each pupil was working with one of the programs. Immediately after the learning session a post-test, testing the pupils' learning performance, and an affect scale were applied. Six weeks later a follow-up testing the learning performance was carried out. In the post-test, the subjects of the EG 1 achieved better results than the other two groups; nevertheless, the difference was not significant. There was a significant interaction effect: the pupils of the EG 1 with high prior knowledge showed a significantly better performance than those with low prior knowledge. Six weeks later the EG 1 achieved significantly better results than the other two groups. There was no longer an interaction effect. The emotions remembered by the three groups were significantly different. The high interest of the pupils of EG 1 was not responsible for the superiority of this group. The results are discussed in regard to classroom instruction and further research studies.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdeyPh. (2004). Accelerating the development of general cognitive processing. In DemetrionA. (Ed.), Cognitive developmental change (pp. 296–317). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
BaronR. M.KennyD. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.
4.
BerlyneD. E. (1974). Konflikt, Erregung, Neugier. Zur Psychologie der kognitiven Motivation. Stuttgart, Germany: Klett.
5.
BrookfieldS. (Ed.). (1985). Self-directed learning: From theory to practice. New Directions for Continuing Education No. 25. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
6.
CaseR. (1985). Intellectual development from birth to adulthood. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
7.
ChanC. K.BurtisP. J.BereiterC. (1997). Knowledge-building approach as a mediator of conflict in conceptual change. Cognition and Instruction, 15(1), 1–40.
8.
De CorteE. (1990). Towards powerful learning environments for the acquisition of problem solving. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 5(1), 5–19.
DubsR. (1995). Konstruktivismus: Einige Überlegungen aus der Sicht der Unterrichtsgestaltung. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 41(6), 905–923.
11.
DuitR. (1996). Lernen als Konzeptwechsel in den Naturwissenschaften. In DuitR.RhöneckC.V. (Eds.), Lernen in den Naturwissenschaften (S. 145–162). Kiel, Germany: IPN.
12.
DuitR.HäußlerP. (1997). Physik und andere naturwissenschaftliche Lernbereiche. In WeinertF. E. (Eds.), Psychologie des Unterrichts und der Schule. Enzyklopädie der Psychologie, Themenbereich D, Bd. 3 (S. 427–460). Göttingen. Germany: Hogrefe.
13.
EfklidesA. (2008). Metacognition. Defining the facts and levels of functioning in relation to self-regulation and co-regulation. European Psychologist, 13(4), 277–287.
14.
EfklidesA. (2009). Promoting future generations as successful learners. Keynote presented at the AEPF-KBBB Conference in Landau, Germany, March 2009.
GlasersfeldE. V. (1994). Piagets konstruktivistisches Modell: Wissen und Lernen. In RuschG.SchmidtS. J. (Eds.), Piaget und der Radikale Konstruktivismus (pp. 16–42). Frankfurt a. M., Germany: Suhrkamp.
17.
GorskyP.FinegoldM. (1994). The role of anomaly and of cognitive dissonance in restructuring studentsconcepts of force. Instructional Science, 22, 75–90.
18.
HeißA.EckhardtA.SchnotzW. (2003). Selbst- und Fremdsteuerung beim Lernen mit Hypermedien. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 17(¾), 211–220.
19.
Hoppe-GraffS. (1993). Sind Konstruktionsprozesse beobachtbar? In EdelsteinW.Hoppe-GraffS. (Eds.), Die Konstruktion kognitiver Strukturen: Perspektiven einer konstruktivistischen Entwicklungspsychologie (pp. 260–275). Bern, Germany: Hans Huber.
20.
KäserU. (2008) (Ed.). Lernen mit dem Computer. Berlin, Germany: Logos.
21.
KollarI.FischerF. (2006). Supporting self-regulated learners for a while and what computers can contribute. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 35(4), 425–435.
22.
LimonC. (2001). On the cognitive conflict as an instructional strategy for conceptual change: A critical appraisal. Learning and Instruction, 11(4–5), 357–380.
23.
LinnM. C. (2008). Teaching for conceptual change: Distinguish or extinguish ideas. In VosniadouS. (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 694–718). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
24.
MandlH.GruberH.RenklA. (1997). Lernen und Lehren mit dem Computer. In WeinertF. E.MandlH. (Eds.), Psychologie der Erwachsenenbildung (pp. 437–466). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
25.
MayerR. E. (2004). Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? The case for guided methods of instruction. American Psychologist, 59(1), 14–19.
26.
MerenluotoK.LehtinenE. (2004). Number concept and conceptual change: Towards a systemic model of the processes of change. Learning and Instruction, 14(5), 519–534.
27.
MertenJ.KrauseR. (1993). D A S (Differentielle Affekt Skala). Arbeiten der Fachrichtung Psychologie, Universität des Saarlandes, Nr. 173. Saarbrücken, Germany: Universität.
NennigerP. (2007). What is self-direction in self-directed learning?—State of the art and consequences for the development of learning potentials. Paper presented at the 12th Biennial Conference for Research in Learning and Instruction. Budapest, 2007.
30.
NiemiecR.SikorskiC.WalbergH. (1996). Learner control effects: A review of reviews and a meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 26(1), 11–29.
31.
PiagetJ. (1976). Die Äquilibration der kognitiven Strukturen. Stuttgart, Germany: Klett.
32.
PsaltisC.DuveenG. (2006). Social relations and cognitive development: The influence of conversation type and representations of gender. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36(3), 407–430.
33.
SanderE. (1986). Lernhierarchien und kognitive Lernförderung. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
34.
SanderE.DraschoffS. (2001). Evaluation of an interactive learning program for trigonometry tasks. Paper presented at the XXVI International Congress of Psychology in Stockholm. University of Stockholm: Abstracts.
35.
SanderE.HeißA. (2007). Konfliktinduzierung beim Lernen mit Neuen Medien. In LemmermöhleD.RothnagelM.BögeholzS.HasselhornM.WatermannR. (Eds.), Professionel lehren—Professionell lernen (pp. 279–290). Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
36.
SchnotzW.VosniadouS.CarreteroM. (1999). Preface. In SchnotzW.VosniadouS.CarreteroM. (Eds.), New perspectives on conceptual change (pp. 3–14). Killington, Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science.
37.
SeidelT.PrenzelM.RimmeleR.HerwegC.KobargM.SchwindtK. (2007). Science teaching and learning in German physics classrooms. Findings from the IPN Video Study. In PrenzelM. (Ed.), Studies on the educational quality of schools. The final report on the DFG Priority Programme (pp. 79–99). Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
38.
SeilerT. B. (1994). Ist Jean Piagets strukturgenetische Erklärung des Denkens eine konstruktivistische Theorie? In RuschG.SchmidtS. J. (Eds.), Piaget und der Radikale Konstruktivismus (pp. 43–102). Frankfurt a. M., Germany: Suhrkamp.
39.
SimonsP. R. J. (1992). Lernen, selbständig zu lernen—Ein Rahmenmodell. In MandlH.FriedrichH. F. (Eds.), Lern- und Denkstrategien (pp. 251–264). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
40.
SodianB. (1995). Entwicklung bereichsspezifischen Wissens. In OerterR.MontadaL. (Eds.), Entwicklungspsychologie (pp. 622–659). Weinheim, Germany: Psychologie Verlags Union.
41.
SpadaH.WichmannS. (1996). Kognitive Determinanten der Lernleistung. In WeinertF. E. (Ed.), Psychologie des Lernens und der Instruktion. Enzyklopädie der Psychologie, Themenbereich D, Bd. 2 (pp. 119–153). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
42.
SternE.HardyI.JonenA.MöllerK. (2006). Effects of instructional support with constructivist learning environments for elementary school students' understanding of “floating and sinking.”Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(2), 307–326.
43.
ToughA. (1979). The adult's learning projects: A fresh approach to theory and practice in adult learning. Toronto, Canada: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.
44.
VosniadouS. (1994). Capturing and modelling the process of conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 4, 45–69.
45.
VosniadouS.VerschaffelL. (2004). Editorial. Extending the conceptual change approach to mathematics learning and teaching. Learning and Instruction, 14, 445–451.
ZoharA.Aharon-KravetskyS. (2005). Exploring the effect of cognitive conflict and direct teaching for students of different academic levels. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(7), 829–855.
