The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of statistics instruction using computer-based tools, on statistics anxiety, attitude, and achievement. This study was designed as quasi-experimental research and the pattern used was a matched pre-test/post-test with control group design. Data was collected using three scales: a Statistics Anxiety Rating Scale, a Statistics Attitude Scale, and a Statistics Achievement Scale. ANCOVA and MANCOVA analyses the used during the analysis process. The findings of the study revealed that computer-based tools statistic instruction reduces statistics anxiety and improves attitude toward statistics and increases success.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AliasgariM.RiahiniaN.MojdehavarF. (2010). Computer-assisted instruction and student attitudes towards learning mathematics. Education, Business and Society: Contemporary Middle Eastern, 3(1), 6–14.
2.
BaloğluM. (2001). An application of structural equation modeling techniques in the prediction of statistics anxiety among college students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Texas A&M University–Commerce, Texas.
3.
BaloğluM. (2003). Individual differences in statistics anxiety among college students. Journal of Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 855–865.
4.
BaloğluM.KoçakR.ZelhartP. F. (2007). The relationship between statistics anxiety and attitudes toward statistics. Ankara Üniversitesi Egitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 40(2), 23–39.
5.
BarnetB. D. (1999). A comparison of the effects of using interactive WWW simulations versus hands-on activities on the conceptual understanding and attitudes of introductory statistics students. Doctoral dissertation, Iowa State University. Dissertation Abstracts International, 60, 3940.
6.
Ben-ZviD. (2000). Toward understanding the role of technological tools in statistical learning. Mathematical Thinking & Learning, 2, 127–155.
7.
CamnalburM.ErdoğanY. (2008). A meta-analysis on the effectiveness of computer-assisted instruction: Turkey sample. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 8(2), 481–505.
8.
ChiuY. H. (2013). Computer-assisted second language vocabulary instruction: A meta-analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(2), 52–56.
9.
ChristmannE. P.BadgetJ. L. (1999). The comparative effectiveness of various microcomputer-based software packages on statistical achievement. Computers in the Schools, 16, 209–220.
10.
Connor-GreeneP. A. (1993). From the laboratory to the headlines: Teaching critical evaluation of press reports of research. Teaching of Psychology, 20, 167–169.
11.
CruiseR. J.CashR. W.BoltonD. L. (1985). Development and validation of an instrument to measure statistical anxiety. American Statistical Association 1985 Proceedings of the Section on Statistical Education (pp. 92–97).
12.
DiriF. Ü. (2007). The analysis of the attitudes towards statistics case of vocational school. Unpublished master dissertation, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.
13.
DoğanN. (2009). The effect of computer-assisted statistics instruction on achievement and attitudes toward statistics. Education and Science, 34(154), 3–16.
14.
EliotA.HallN. (1997). The impact of self regularity teaching strategies on at risk preschoolers mathematical learning in a computer mediated environment. Journal of Computing in Childhood Education, 8, 187–198.
15.
FensterM. J. (1992). Statistics courses and adult learners: Assessing potential problems. Journal of Studies in Technical Careers, 14, 11–22.
16.
FitzgeraldS. M. (1997). The relationship between anxiety and statistics achievement: A meta-analysis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH.
17.
GardnerK. D. (2007). Investigating secondary school students' experience of learning statistics. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Georgia State University, Atlanta.
18.
GarfeldJ. (1995). How students learn statistics. International Statistical Review, 63, 25–34.
19.
GratzZ. S.WolpeG. D.KindB. M. (1993). Attitudes and achievement in introductory psychological statistics classes: Traditional versus computer-supported instruction. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED346082)
20.
HasselbringT. (1984). Research on the effectiveness of computer-based instruction: A review. International Review of Education, 32(3), 313–324.
21.
HoggR. V. (1992). Towards lean and lively course in statistics. In GordonF.GordonS. (Eds.), Statistics for the twenty-first century MAA notes No. 26 (pp. 3–13). Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
22.
HsuY. (2003). The effectiveness of computer-assisted instruction in statistics education: A meta-analysis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Arizona, Arizona.
23.
LarwinK.LarvinD. (2011). A meta-analysis examining the impact of computer-assisted instruction on postsecondary statistics education: 40 years of research. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(3), 253–278.
24.
MvududuN. (2005). An attempt to move from “sadistics” to statistics. A spotlight presentation at the 1st Biannual United States Conference on Teaching Statistics (USCOTS) May 19–21, 2005, Ohio State University, Columbus.
25.
NeumanW. L. (2008). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. İstanbul: Yayinodasi.
26.
OnwuegbuzieA. J. (1993). The interaction of statistics test anxiety and examination condition in statistics achievement of post-baccalaureate non-statistics majors. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of South Carolina, South Carolina.
27.
OnwuegbuzieA. J. (1998). Statistics anxiety: A function of learning style?Research in the Schools, 5, 43–52.
28.
PetersonI. (1991). Pick a sample. Science News, 140, 56–58.
29.
PetrocelliJ. V. (2007). The utility of computer-assisted power analysis lab instruction. Teaching of Psychology, 34(4), 248–252.
30.
RoblyerM. D.CastineW. H.KingF. J. (1988). Assessing the impact of based instruction: A review of recent research. New York, NY: Haworth Press.
31.
RosenthalB. (1992). No more sadistics, no more sadists, no more victims. UMAP Journal, 13, 281–290.
32.
RuffinE. T. (2000). Computer-assisted instruction: Demographic variables and student attitudes. Doctoral dissertation. Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 9960907).
33.
SangerM. J.PhelpsA. J.FienholdJ. (2000). Using a computer animation to improve students' conceptual understanding of a can-crushing demonstration. Journal of Chemical Education, 77(11), 1517–1520.
34.
SchuytenG.DekeyserH. M. (2007). Preference for textual information and acting on support devices in multiple representations in a computer based learning environment for statistics. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 2285–2301.
35.
SosaG. W.BergerD. E.SawA. T.MaryJ. C. (2011). Meta-analysis effectiveness of computer-assisted instruction in statistics: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 81(1), 97–128.
36.
SterlingJ.GrayM. W. (1991). The effect of simulation software on students' attitudes and understanding in introductory statistics. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 10(4), 51–56.
37.
VernadakisN.ZetouE.TsitskariE.GiannousiM.KioumourtzoglouE. (2008). Student attitude and learning outcomes of multimedia computer-assisted versus traditional instruction in basketball. Education and Information Technologies, 13(3), 167–183.
38.
WenderW. F.MuehlboeckJ. S. (2003). Animated diagrams in teaching statistics. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 35, 255–258.
39.
WiseS. L. (1985). The development and validation of a scale measuring attitudes toward statistics. Educational and Psychology Measurement, 45, 401–405.
40.
WongC. K. (2001). Attitudes and achievement: Comparing computer based and traditional homework assignments in mathematics. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(5), 159–176.
41.
ZeidnerM. (1991). Statistics and mathematics anxiety in social science students—Some interesting parallels. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 61, 319–328.
