Impacts of Mobile Computing on Student Learning in the University: A Comparison of Course Assessment Data

Abstract

This study focuses on the impact of wireless, mobile computing tools on student assessment outcomes. In a campus-wide wireless, mobile computing environment at an upper Midwest university, an empirical analysis is applied to understand the relationship between student performance and Tablet PC use. An experimental/control group comparison of mobile computing enabled learning outcomes in selected courses showed that the integration of wireless technology and highly functional computing tools did not have a negative effect on student assessment results. Out of the four courses evaluated, none of the revealed test scores were statistically different between non-using and mobile computer using groups, indicating no negative impacts of the introduction of ubiquitous technology into the classroom. A freshman-level college math course showed statistically significantly positive differences in course assessment scores when mobile computing was implemented over the same timeline. Results are discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Amirian

(2004). Putting Tablet PCs to the test, T.H.E. Journal, 32(4), 28–30.

Barbosa

Hahn

Barbosa

Geyer

(2007). Mobile and ubiquitous computing in an innovative undergraduate course. SIGCSE'07 March 7–10, Covington, pp. 379–383.

Bauer

Kenton

(2005). Toward technology integration in schools: Why it isn't happening. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(4), 519–546.

Berque

Bonebright

Whitesell

(2004). Using Pen-Based Computers Across the Computer Science Curriculum. Proceedings of the 35th SIGCSE Technology Symposium on Computer Science Education, Norfolk, Virginia, pp. 61–65.

Bolick

Berson

Friedman

Porfeli

(2007). Diffusion of technology innovation in the preservice social studies experience: Results of a national survey. Theory and Research in Social Education, 35(2), 174–195.

Bradley

Haynes

Boyle

(2005). Adult multimedia learning with PDAs—The user experience. Proceedings of the 4th World Conference on mobile learning (mLearn), Cape Town.

Cao

Tin

McGreal

Ally

Coffey

(2006). The Athabasca University Mobile Library Project: Increasing the boundaries of anytime and anywhere learning for students. IWCMC '06, July 3–6, Vancouver.

Cambre

Hawkes

(2004). Toys, tools, and teachers: The challenges of technology. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Education Press.

Cox

Rogers

(2005). Tablet PCs: Are they the next technopedagogical fad? Journal of College Science Teaching, 34(6), 7.

10.

DiGiorgio

(2003). Florida school participates in Tablet PC pilot program. T.H.E. Journal, 31(4), 10.

11.

Drucker

(2006). Commentary: Crossing the digital divide: How race, class, and culture matter. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 6(1), 43–45.

12.

Eduards

Barnette

(2004). Experiences using Tablet PCs in a programming laboratory. Proceedings of the 35th SIGCSE Technology Symposium on Computer Science Education, Norfolk, Virginia, pp. 160–165.

13.

Fies

Marshall

(2006, March). Classroom response systems: A review of the literature. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15(1), 101–109.

14.

Franklin

Molebash

(2007). Technology in the elementary social studies classroom: Teacher preparation does matter. Theory and Research in Social Education, 35(2), 153–173.

15.

Foster

(2004). Tablets score high marks at private school. Computing Canada, 30(9), 28–32.

16.

Fujimura

Doi

(2006). Collecting students degree of comprehension with mobile phones. Proceedings of the 34th Annual ACM SIGUCCS conference on user services, pp. 123–127.

17.

Gulek

Demirtas

(2005). Learning with technology: The impact of laptop use on student achievement. The Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 3(2). Available at: http://www.jtla.org

18.

Hall

George

Rutherford

(1986). Measuring the stage of concern about the innovation. Southwest Educational Development laboratory. Austin, Texas.

19.

Hew

Brush

(2007). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 55(3), 223–252.

20.

Hughes

Ooms

(2004). Content-focused technology inquiry groups: Preparing urban teachers to integrate technology to transform student learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(4), 397–411.

21.

Jaillet

(2004). What is happening with portable computers in schools? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13(1), 115–128.

22.

Judge

Puckett

Cabuk

(2004). Digital equity: New findings from the early childhood longitudinal study. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(4), 383–396.

23.

Knezek

Christensen

(2005). Student findings from the spring 2005 Irving laptop survey. University of North Texas, Institute for the Integration of Technology into Teaching and Learning.

24.

Kukulska-Hulme

Traxler

(2005). Mobile learning: A handbook for educators and trainers. Routledge, London and New York.

25.

Lawless

Pellegrino

(2007). Professional development in integrating technology into teaching and learning: Knowns, unknowns, and ways to pursue better questions and answers. Review of Educational Research, 77, 575–614.

26.

Light

McDermott

Honey

(2002). Project Hiller: The impact of ubiquitous portable technology on an urban school. New York: Center for Children and Technology, Education Development Center.

27.

Lindquist

Denning

Kelly

Malani

Griswold

Simon

(2007). Exploring the potential of mobile phones for active learning in the classroom. Proceedings of the 38th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 39(1), 384–388.

28.

Lowther

Ross

Morrison

(2003). When each one has one: The influences on teaching strategies and student achievement of using laptops in the classroom. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51(3), 23–44.

29.

Miertschin

Willis

(2004). Mobile computing in the freshman computer literacy course: What impact? SIGITE '04, October 28–30, Salt Lake City, pp. 149–152.

30.

Norris

Soloway

(2004). Envisioning the handheld centric classroom. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 30(4), 281–294.

31.

Penuel

Kim

Michalchik

Lewis

Means

Murphy

(2002). Using technology to enhance connections between home and school: A research synthesis. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.

32.

Pietraszewski

Smith

(2004). Enabling the roving reference librarian: Wireless access with tablet PCd. Reference Services Review, 32(3), 249–255.

33.

Raban

Litchfield

(2007). Supporting peer assessment of individual contributions in groupwork. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 23(1), 34–47.

34.

Roach

(2004). Tablet PCs getting campus tryouts: Mobile computing device said to launch new era in personal computing. Black Issues in Higher Education, 21(10), 36–39.

35.

Schaumburg

(2001, June). Fostering girls' computer literacy through laptop learning. Paper presented at the National Educational Computing Conference, Chicago, Illinois.

36.

Swain

Pearson

(2003). Educators and technology standards: Influencing the digital divide. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(3), 326–335.

37.

Trimmel

Bachmann

(2004). Cognitive, social, motivational and health aspects of students in laptop classrooms. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20(2), 151–158.

38.

Twining

Evans

(2005). Should there be a future for Tablet PCs in schools? Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 20(4), 1–6.

39.

Van't Hooft

Swan

(2007). Ubiquitous computing in education: Invisible technology, visible impact. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

40.

Zucker

McGhee

(2005). A study of one-to-one computer use in mathematics and science. Instruction at the secondary level in Henrio County Public Schools (No. 0231147). Washington, DC: SRI International.