Instructors as Architects—Designing Learning Spaces for Discussion-Based Online Courses

Abstract

Online learning space design becomes a significant issue with the proliferation of online learning in higher education. Never before has the instructor been given such a privilege in building and molding the learning space to fulfill his/her instructional aspirations. However, enormous challenges are present to the instructor in taking advantage of this newly gained freedom. Most instructors have limited awareness of their new roles as learning space designers. Although learning space plays an important role in mediating student learning, it is a topic that is least understood. Therefore, it is important for online course instructors to start a dialogue in learning space design. This article reports our experiences of designing learning spaces in a discussion-based online course to facilitate and organize student learning.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allen

Seaman

(2010). Learning on demand: Online education in the United States, 2009. Retrieved April 15, 2010, from The Sloan Consortium, http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/survey/pdf/learningondemand.pdf

Carroll

J. M.

Mack

R. L.

(1999). Metaphor, computing systems, and active learning. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 51, 385–403.

Chism

N. V. N.

Bickford

(Eds.). (2002). The importance of physical space in creating supportive learning environments. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Franck

K. A.

Quentin

(2007). Loose space: Possibility and diversity in urban life. London: Taylor & Francis Routledge.

Garrison

D. R.

Anderson

Archer

(2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105.

Jamieson

Fisher

Gilding

Taylor

Trevitt

(2000). Place and space in the design of new learning environments. Higher Education Research and Development, 19(2), 221–237.

Jolivette

B. J.

(2006). Social presence and its relevancy to cognitive and affective learning in an asynchronous distance-learning environment: A preliminary literature review. Paper presented at the annual meeting of Academy of Human Resource Development International Research Conference, Columbus, Ohio.

Jones

(2008, October). The magic of metaphor. UXmatters. Retrieved online from http://www.uxmatters.com/authors/archives/2007/05/colleen_jones.php

Nardi

B. A.

Zarmer

C. L.

(1993). Beyond models and metaphors: Visual formalisms in user interface design. Visual Languages & Computing, 4(1), 5–33.

10.

Oblinger

D. G.

(2006). Spaces as a change agent. In Oblinger

D. G.

(Ed)., Learning spaces (pp. 1.1–1.4). Retrieved January 1, 2010, from EDUCAUSE http://www.educause.edu/learningspaces/

11.

O'Neill

(2005). Presence, place and the virtual spectacle. PsychNology Journal, 3(2), 149–161.

12.

Richardson

Swan

(2003). An examination of social presence in online learning: Students' perceived learning and satisfaction. Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(1), 68–88.

13.

Rover

D. T.

(2007). Space to learn. Journal of Engineering Education, 79–81.

14.

Scott-Webber

(2004). In sync: Environmental behavior research and the design of learning spaces. Ann Arbor, MI: The Society for College and University Planning.

15.

Temple

(2008). Learning spaces in higher education: An under-researched topic. London Review of Education, 6(3), 229–241.

16.

Wahlstedt

Pekkola

Niemela

(2008). From e-learning space to e-learning place. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(6), 1020–1030.

17.

Walker

(2005). Critical thinking in asynchronous discussions. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Learning, 2(6). Available online at http://itdl.org/journal/jun_05/article02.htm