Effects of Integrating Multimedia into the Third Grade Mathematics Curriculum to Improve Student Learning

Abstract

This project was designed to test Mayer's multimedia theory in an elementary school to improve students' mathematics learning for low-income children. The study designed and developed two multimedia mathematics experiments in 3rd grade: 9's multiplication experiment and geometric solids experiment. The two experimental lessons were implemented in two 3rd grade classes of low-income children in the United States in January and May 2010, respectively. A one-group pretest-posttest design was used to collect quantitative and qualitative data in both experiments. Both experiments found that the participating teacher and students scored very high respectively; the participating students were very attentive to multimedia mathematics instruction; and the participating students scored significantly higher in mathematics quizzes at posttest at the end of the implementation than at pretest prior to the implementation. The project has theoretical and practical implications for international kindergarten through high school education.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Astleitner

Wiesner

(2004). An integrated model of multimedia learning and motivation. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 13(1), 3–21.

Baddeley

A. D.

(1992). Working memory. Science, 255, 556–559.

Baddeley

A. D.

(1999). Human memory. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

Barnett

(2003, September). Investing in technology: The payoff of student learning. ERIC/IT Digest. Office of Educational Research and Improvement, Washington, DC. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 479 843).

Barton

P. E.

(1998). Does it compute? The relationship between educational technology and student achievement in mathematics. Princeton, NJ: ETS.

Barton

P. E.

(2002). Raising achievement and reducing gaps: Reporting progress toward goals for academic achievement in mathematics (a report to the National Education Goals Panel). Princeton, NJ: ETS.

Baxter

J. H.

Preece

P. F. W.

(1999). Interactive multimedia and concrete three-dimensional modelling. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 15, 323–331.

Beal

C. R.

(2007). Online tutoring for math achievement testing: A controlled evaluation. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 6(1), 43–55.

Blanchard

Stock

Marshall

(1999). Meta-analysis of research on a multimedia elementary school curriculum using personal and video-game computers. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 88, 329–336.

10.

Bork

(1992). Learning in the twenty-first century interactive multimedia technology. In Giardina

(Eds.), Interactive multimedia learning environments: Human factors and technical considerations on design issues (pp. 2–18). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.

11.

Bottge

B. A.

Heinrichs

Chan

Serlin

R. C.

(2001). Anchoring adolescents' understanding of math concepts in rich problem solving environments. Remedial and Special Education, 22, 299–314.

12.

Bottge

B. A.

Rueda

Serlin

R. C.

Hung

Y. H.

Kwon

J. M.

(2007). Shrinking achievement differences with anchored math problems: Challenges and possibilities. The Journal of Special Education, 41(1), 31–49.

13.

Bottge

B. A.

Rueda

Skivington

(2006). Situating math instruction in rich problem-solving contexts: Effects on adolescents with challenging behaviors. Behavioral Disorders, 31(4), 394–407.

14.

Bowers

Doerr

(2003). Designing multimedia case studies for prospective mathematics teachers. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 12(2), 135–161.

15.

Carver

S. M.

Klahr

(Eds.). (2001). Cognition and instruction: Twenty-five years of progress. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

16.

Chambel

Guimaraes

(2002). Communicating and learning mathematics with hypervideo. In Borwein

Morales

M. H.

Polthier

Rodrigues

J. F.

(Eds.), Multimedia tools for communicating mathematics (pp. 79–91). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.

17.

Chang

C. Y.

(2004). Could a laptop computer plus the liquid crystal display projector amount to improved multimedia geoscience instruction? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20, 4–10.

18.

Clark

J. M.

Paivio

(1991). Dual coding theory and education. Educational Psychology Review, 53(2), 445–459.

19.

Cohen

(1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

20.

Dick

Carey

J. O.

(2001). The systematic design of instruction (5th ed.). Boston: Addison-Wesley Educational Publishers.

21.

Dimitriadi

(2001). Evaluating the use of multimedia authoring with dyslexic learners: A case study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32, 265–275.

22.

Doerr

H. M.

Thompson

(2004). Understanding teacher educators and their preservice teachers through multi-media case studies of practice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 7(3), 175–201.

23.

Donlevy

(2004). Instructional media initiatives: Focusing on the educational resources center at thirteen/WNET, New York, NY. International Journal of Instructional Media, 31(1), 5–7.

24.

Dugdale

(2001). Preservice teachers' use of computer simulation to explore probability. Computers in the Schools, 17(1–2), 173–182.

25.

Eskicioglu

Kopec

(2003). The ideal multimedia-enabled classroom: Perspectives from psychology, education, and information science. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 12(2), 199–221.

26.

Hake

(2007). Saxon math—Intermediate 3. Saxon Publishers. Orlando, FL: Harcourt.

27.

Hiebert

Carpenter

T. P.

Fennema

Fuson

K. C.

Wearne

Murray

(1997). Making sense: Teaching and learning mathematics with understanding. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

28.

Hwang

Chen

Hsu

(2006). Development and evaluation of multimedia whiteboard system for improving mathematical problem solving. Computers & Education, 46, 105–121.

29.

Illinois State Board of Education (ISBE). (2009). 2009 Illinois School Profile: Madison Community Unit School District. Springfield, IL.

30.

Irish

(2002). Using peg-and keyword mnemonics and computer-assisted instruction to enhance basic multiplication performance in elementary students with learning and cognitive disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 17(4), 29–40.

31.

Johari

(2003). Effects of inductive multimedia programs in mediating word problem translation misconceptions. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 30(1), 47–68.

32.

Jonassen

(2000). Computers as mindtools for schools. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.

33.

Jones

(1994). Video and multimedia for math and science instruction. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 13, 128–145.

34.

Kinard

Bitter

(1997). Multicultural mathematics and technology: The Hispanic math project. Computers in the Schools, 13(1/2), 77–88.

35.

Koroghlanian

Klein

J. D.

(2004). The effect of audio and animation in multimedia instruction. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 13, 23–46.

36.

Leahy

Chandler

Sweller

(2003). When auditory presentations should and should not be a component of multimedia instruction. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 401–418.

37.

(2005). Infusing technology into a mathematics methods course: Any impact? Educational Research, 47(2), 217–233.

38.

Liu

Hsiao

(2002). Middle school students as multimedia designers: A project-based learning approach. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 13, 311–337.

39.

Lucey

L. P.

Jennings

Olson

Rubenfeld

Holmes

A. E.

(2007). The power of string: Building a conceptual foundation for measuring rate. Teaching Children Mathematics, 4(1), 18–24.

40.

Macaulay

(2003). The effects of multimedia on learning in third world children. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 12, 185–198.

41.

Maddux

Johnson

Willis

(2001). Educational computer: Learning with tomorrow's technologies. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

42.

Mayer

R. E.

(1997). Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions? Educational Psychologist, 32, 1–19.

43.

Mayer

R. E.

(1999). Multimedia aids to problem-solving transfer. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 1–19.

44.

Mayer

R. E.

(2001). Multimedia learning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

45.

Mayer

R. E.

Heiser

Lonn

(2001). Cognitive constraints on multimedia learning: When presenting more material results in less understanding. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 187–198.

46.

Mikk

Luik

(2003). Characteristics of multimedia textbooks that affect post-test scores. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19, 528–537.

47.

Moreno

Duran

(2004). Do multiple representations need explanations? The role of verbal guidance and individual differences in multimedia mathematics learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(3), 492–503.

48.

Moreno

Mayer

R. E.

(2002). Verbal redundancy in multimedia learning: When reading helps listening. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 156–163.

49.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA.

50.

Norusis

(2006). SPSS 13.0 guide to data analysis. Upper Saddle Riddle, NJ: Prentice Hall.

51.

Nulden

Ward

(2002). Multimedia scenario in a primary school. Information Technology in Childhood Education Annual, 14, 61–85.

52.

Okolo

C. M.

Ferretti

R. P.

(1996). The impact of multimedia design projects on the knowledge, attitudes, and collaboration of students in inclusive classrooms. Journal of Computing in Childhood Education, 7, 223–251.

53.

Orman

E. K.

(1998). Effect of interactive multimedia computing on young saxophonists' achievement and attitude. Journal of Research in Music Education, 46, 62–74.

54.

Passig

Levin

(2000). Gender preferences for multimedia interfaces. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 16, 64–71.

55.

Paivio

(1991). Dual coding theory: Retrospective and current status. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 45, 255–287.

56.

Reimer

Moyer

P. S.

(2005). Third graders learn about fractions using virtual manipulatives: A classroom study. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 24(1), 5–25.

57.

Scarlatos

L. L.

(2002). Ticle: Using multimedia multimodal guidance to enhance learning. Information Sciences, 140, 85–103.

58.

Seo

Y. J.

Woo

(2010). The identification, implementation, and evaluation of critical user interface design features of computer-assisted instruction programs in mathematics for students with learning disabilities. Computers & Education, 55, 363–377.

59.

Silverman

(2003). Lighting the dark ages. District Administration [Electronic version]. January Issue. Retrieved October 16, 2003 from http://www.districtadministration.com/page.cfm?p=300

60.

Skemp

R. R.

(1976). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Arithmetic Teacher, 77, 20–26.

61.

Smith

(1999). Opportunities for ICT in the primary school. Staffordshire, England: Trentham Books Limited.

62.

Steelman

J. D.

(2005). Multimedia makes its mark: The benefits and drawbacks of including multimedia-rich projects in your curriculum. Learning & Leading with Technology, 33(1), 16–18.

63.

Sweller

(1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12, 257–285.

64.

Sweller

(1999). Instruction design in technical areas. Camberwell, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.

65.

Tjus

Heimann

Nelson

K. E.

(2001). Interaction patterns between children and their teachers when using a specific multimedia and communication strategy: Observations from children with autism and mixed intellectual disabilities. Autism: The International Journal of Research and Practice, 5, 175–187.

66.

Tooke

(2001). Mathematics, the computer, and the impact on mathematics education. In Tooke

Henderson

(Eds.), Using information technology in mathematics education (pp. 1–8). Binghamton, NY: The Haworth Press, Inc.

67.

Treadwell

(1999). Meeting individual needs by customizing standard software. Multi-Media Schools, 6(1), 34–37.

68.

Van de Walle

(2007). Elementary and middle school mathematics: Teaching developmentally (6th ed.). New York: Addison Wesley Longman.

69.

Wenglinsky

(1998). Does it compute? The relationship between educational technology and student achievement in mathematics. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 425 191).

70.

Wiest

L. R.

(2001). The role of computers in mathematics teaching and learning. In Tooke

Henderson

(Eds.), Using information technology in mathematics education (pp. 41–56). Binghamton, NY: The Haworth Press, Inc.

71.

Wilder

Schoech

(2002). Clients as co-developers of multimedia software: Two HIV/AIDS training programs for kids. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 20, 83–105.

72.

Wilson

(1999). Student-generated multimedia presentations: Tools to help build and communicate mathematical understanding. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 18(2), 145–156.