The research described here examines the problems encountered by people when filling in forms. Subjects were required to complete forms on the basis of a situation sketch, while thinking aloud. From the completed forms, the observations, and the subjects' comments, conclusions could be drawn about the types of problems the subjects had encountered and about the strategies they had used. These conclusions, together with various suggestions found in the literature, provided a guideline for a thorough revision of seven forms. A test showed that, after revision, the number of forms completed unacceptably was reduced by about half.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
van OorschotW. and TankeKolkhuis P., Niet-gebruik van sociale zekerheid; Feiten, theorieën, onderzoeksmethoden, SZW-reeks nr. 16, Ministerie van Sociale zaken en Werkgelegenheid, 's-Gravenhage, 1989.
2.
KerrS., Making Ends Meet; An Investigation into the Non-Claiming of Supplementary Pensions, Bedford Square Press, London, England, 1983.
3.
ThomassenJ., Overheid en burger bij de uitvoering van het overheidsbeleid, in Politiek in Nederland, AndewegR.HoogerwerffA. and ThomassenJ. (eds.), Alphen a/d Rijn, pp. 294–316, 1981.
4.
JansenC. and SteehouderM., Taalverkeersproblemen tussen overheid en burger; Een onderzoek naar verbeteringsmogelijkheden van voorlichtingsteksten en formulieren [Communication Problems between Government and Citizens; A Study into Techniques for Improving the Quality of Instructional Texts and Forms (with a summary in English)], Diss. RU Utrecht, SDU,'s-Gravenhage, 1989.
5.
HuismansS. and SiegeristE., Burger en overheid; Een analyse van wat de Nederlandse burger vindt van de overheid, Alphen a/d Rijn, 1974.
6.
Knapper and McAlley, Het externe beeld van de individuele huursubsidie, Knapper and McAlley BV, Industrial Marketing Research and Consultancy, Amsterdam, 1982.
7.
JansenC., De GSD en zijn cliënten; Verslag van een onderzoek naar opinies van cliënten over de Gemeentelijke Sociale Dienst van Hengelo(O), PvdA, Hengelo, 1984.
8.
WrightP., Informed Design for Forms, in Information Design; The Design and Evaluation of Signs and Printed Material, EasterbyR. and ZwagaH. (eds.), Chichester, England, pp. 545–577, 1981.
9.
WrightP.Strategy and Tactics in the Design of Forms, Visible Language, 14, pp. 151–193, 1980.
10.
HollandV. M. and RedishJ. C., Strategies for Understanding Forms and Other Public Documents, Document Design Center, American Institutes for Research, Washington, D.C., 1981.
11.
RoseA.Problems in Public Documents, Information Design Journal, 2, pp. 179–196, 1981.
12.
FrohlichD. M.On the organisation of Form-Filling Behaviour, Information Design Journal, 5, pp. 43–59, 1986.
13.
LandaL., Algorithmization in Learning and Instruction, Educational Technology Publications, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1974.
14.
FlowerL.HayesJ., and SwartsH., Revising Functional Documents: The Scenario Principle, in New Essays in Technical and Scientific Communication; Research, Theory and Practice, AndersonP.BrockmanR., and MillerC. (eds.), Baywood Publishing Co., Amityville, New York, pp. 41–58, 1983.
15.
JansenC.SteehouderM., Formulierenwijzer; Handboek voor het redigeren van formulieren, SDU, 's-Gravenhage, 1989.
16.
SteehouderM. and JansenC., Assessing the Optimal Order for Instructions, Twente University, Enschede, The Netherlands, (forthcoming).
17.
EricssonK. and SimonH., Protocol Analysis; Verbal Reports as Data, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1984.
18.
SchumacherG. and WallerR., Testing Design Alternatives; A Comparison of Methods, in Designing Usable Texts, DuffyT. and WallerR. (eds.), Academic Press, Orlando, Florida, pp. 377–403, 1985.
19.
SchriverK.Evaluating Text Quality: The Continuum from Text-Focused to Reader-Focused Methods, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 32, pp. 238–255, 1989.
20.
CarrollJ. M.Exploring a Word Processor, Human Computer Interaction, 1, pp. 283–307, 1985.
21.
SteehouderM. and JansenC.From Bureaucratic Language to Instructional Texts; How to Design an Effective Problem-Solving Tool for Citizens, Information Design Journal, 5, pp. 129–139, 1987.
22.
JansenC.SteehouderM., ALEXIS: Computer-assisted Feedback on Written Assignments, in: EURIT 86; Development of Educational Software, MoonenY. and PlompT. (eds.), Pergamon Press, London, England, pp. 81–87, 1987.
23.
JansenC. and SteehouderM.Improving the Text of a Public Leaflet, Information Design Journal, 4, pp. 10–18, 1984.
