Regionalization of the health care system, through the creation of sub-provincial service-delivery regions and governance authorities (i.e., regional health authorities, RHAs), has been a key part of Canadian health reform initiatives of the past two decades. Increased public participation in health care planning and service delivery is one of the explicit goals of regionalization. Based on a reanalysis of data from a 2001 survey of health system governors from 134 RHAs throughout Canada, this study explores the overall demographic composition of the citizen governance boards, as well as their responses to various opinion and attitude questions. To enable consideration of the extent to which these sites may support public deliberation and community development, overall responses are examined, as are responses within two subtypes of governors: system-experienced citizen governors and lay citizen governors—governors with or without previous health-system employment experience, respectively. The findings suggest that attention needs to be paid to these citizen governance boards if they are truly meant to be sites of citizen engagement in health policy and governance.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CharlesC.DeMaioS.Lay participation in health care decision making: A conceptual framework. J. Health Polit. Policy18:881–904, 1993.
2.
ChurchJ.BarkerP.Regionalization of health services in Canada: A critical perspective. Int. J. Health Serv. 28:467–486, 1998.
3.
ChurchJ.Citizen participation in health decision-making: Past experience and future prospects. J. Public Health Policy32:12–32, 2002.
4.
DickinsonH. D.Public involvement in the development of a health care vision. In Changing Health Care in Canada: The Romanow Papers, Vol. 2, ed. ForestP. G.MarchildonG. P.McIntoshT., pp. 243–278. University of Toronto Press, Toronto, 2004.
5.
LomasJ.Devolving authority for health care in Canada's provinces: 4. Emerging issues and prospects. CMAJ156:817–823, 1997.
6.
LomasJ.WoodsJ.VeenstraG.Devolving authority for health care in Canada's provinces: 1. An introduction to the issues. CMAJ156:371–377, 1997.
7.
MhatreS. L.DeberR. B.From equal access to health care to equitable access to health: A review of Canadian provincial health commissions and reports. Int. J. Health Serv. 22:645–668, 1992.
8.
LewisS.Regionalization and Devolution: Transforming Health, Reshaping Politics? Occasional Paper No. 2. HEALNet, Saskatoon, SK, 1997.
9.
GallantJ. C., (chair). The Nova Scotia Royal Commission on Health Care. Nova Scotia Royal Commission on Health Care, Halifax, NS, 1987.
10.
HyndmanL., (chair). The Rainbow Report: Our Vision for Health—Premier's Commission on Future Health Care for Albertans. Premier's Commission on Future of Health Care for Albertans, Edmonton, AB, 1989.
11.
MurrayR. G., (chair). Future Directions for Health Care in Saskatchewan. Saskatchewan Commission on Directions in Health Care, Regina, SK, 1990.
12.
New Brunswick Department of Health and Community Services. A Health and Community Services Plan for New Brunswick: Managing Health and Community Services for the Well-Being of New Brunswickers. Government of New Brunswick, Fredericton, NB, 1992.
13.
Nova Scotia Action Committee on Health System Reform. Nova Scotia's Blueprint for Health System Reform. Government of Nova Scotia, Halifax, NS, 1994.
14.
Quebec Ministry of Health and Social Services. A Reform Centred on the Citizen. Government of Quebec, Quebec, QC, 1990.
15.
RochonJ., (chair). Rapport de la Commission d'EnquetL sur les Services de Santé et les Services Sociaux. Government of Quebec, Quebec, QC, 1987.
16.
BoonT. E.MeilbyH.Enhancing public participation in state forest management: A user council survey. Forestry73:155–164, 2000.
17.
CohenM.Democratizing Public Services: Lessons from Other Jurisdictions and Implications for Health Care Reform in BC. Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, BC Office, Vancouver, BC, 2005.
18.
ElstadJ. I.Health services and decentralized government: The case of primary health services in Norway. Int. J. Health Serv. 20:545–559, 1990.
19.
ElamonJ.FrankeR. W.EkbalB.Decentralization of health services: The Kerala people's campaign. Int. J. Health Serv. 34:681–708, 2004.
20.
NorthN.WerköS.Widening the debate? Consultation and participation in local health care planning in the English and Swedish health services. Int. J. Health Serv. 32:781–798, 2002.
21.
RuiS.Transport policy and public involvement. Innov. Eur. J. Soc. Sci.17:129–144, 2004.
22.
HabermasJ.The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. I: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Beacon Press, Boston, 1984.
23.
HabermasJ.The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. II: Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason. Beacon Press, Boston, 1984.
24.
DryzekJ. S.Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations. Oxford University Press, New York, 2000.
25.
FerreeM.Four models of the public sphere in modern democracies. Theor. Soc.31:289–324, 2002.
26.
DickinsonH. D.Health reform, empowerment and the democratization of society. In Efficiency vs. Equality: Health Reform in Canada, ed. StinglM.WilsonD., pp. 179–189. Fernwood, Halifax, NS, 1996.
27.
DickinsonH. D.BolariaB. S.The Canadian health care system: Evolution and current status. In Health, Illness and Health Care in Canada, ed. BolariaB. S.DickinsonH. D., pp. 20–36. Nelson Thomson Learning, Scarborough, ON, 2002.
28.
JensenN. M.SuchmanA. L.Partnering with citizens to reform Wisconsin health care: A report of the first citizen congress. Wis. Med. J.103:13–17, 2004.
29.
MurphyN. J.Citizen deliberation in setting health-care priorities. Health Expect. 8:172–181, 2005.
30.
NealeA.An opportunity for civic leadership. Health Prog. 85:36–56, 2004.
31.
VanderPlaatM.Empowerment, emancipation and health promotion policy. Can. J. Sociol.23:71–90, 1998.
32.
FlyvbjergB.Habermas and Foucault: Thinkers for civil society?Br. J. Sociol.49:210–233, 1998.
33.
LandesJ. B.The public and the private sphere: A feminist reconsideration. In Feminists Read Habermas: Gendering the Subject of Discourse, ed. MeehanJ., pp. 91–116. Routledge, New York, 1995.
34.
KellyM.Introduction. In Critique and Power: Recasting the Foucault/Habermas Debate, ed. KellyM., pp. 1–16. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1994.
35.
World Health Organization. Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion, November 1986. First International Conference on Health Promotion, Ottawa, ON, 1986.
36.
Canadian Public Health Association. Focus on health: Public health in health services restructuring. Can. J. Public Health87:1–56, 1996.
37.
WallersteinN.What Is the Evidence on Effectiveness of Empowerment to Improve Health?WHO Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, 2006.
38.
HigginsJ. WharfCloser to home: The case for experiential participation in health reform. Can. J. Public Health90:30–34, 1999.
39.
AbelsonJ.Understanding the role of contextual influences on local health-care decision making: Case study results from Ontario, Canada. Soc. Sci. Med.53:777–793, 2001.
40.
DillmanD. A.Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method. Wiley, New York, 1978.
41.
LomasJ.VeenstraG.WoodsJ.Devolving authority for health care in Canada's provinces: 2. Backgrounds, resources and activities of board members. CMAJ156:513–520, 1997.
42.
LewisS.Devolution to democratic health authorities in Saskatchewan: An interim report. CMAJ164:343–347, 2001.
43.
O'NeillM.Community participation in Quebec's health system: A strategy to curtail community empowerment?Int. J. Health Serv. 22:287–301, 1992.
44.
EakinJ.Survival of the fittest? The democratization of hospital administration in Quebec. Int. J. Health Serv. 14:397–412, 1984.
45.
AbelsonJ.Does the community want devolved authority? Results of deliberative polling in Ontario. CMAJ153:403–412, 1975.
46.
LittleM.Discourse in difference voices: Reconciling n = 1 and n = many. Soc. Sci. Med.55:1079–1087, 2002.
47.
PedersonA. P.Coordinating Health Public Policy: An Analytic Literature Review and Bibliography. University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, 1988.
48.
GodboutJ.Is consumer control possible in health care services?Int. J. Health Serv. 11:151–167, 1981.
49.
BjörkmanJ. W.Who governs the health sector? Comparative European and American experiences with representation, participation, and decentralization. Comp. Polit.17:399–420, 1985.
50.
MilewaT.ValentineJ.CalnanM.Managerialism and active citizenship in Britain's reformed health service: Power and community in an era of decentralisation. Soc. Sci. Med.47:507–517, 1999.
51.
LomasJ.VeenstraG.WoodsJ.Devolving authority for health care in Canada's provinces: 3. Motivations, attitudes and approaches of board members. CMAJ156:669–676, 1997.
52.
KouriD.ChessieK.LewisS.Regionalization: Where Has All the Power Gone? A Survey of Canadian Decision-Makers in Health Care Regionalization. Canadian Center for the Analysis of Regionalization and Health, Saskatoon, SK, 2002.
53.
Statistics Canada. Population 15 Years and Over by Highest Degree, Certificate or Diploma (1986–2001 Censuses). www40.statcan.ca/l01/cst01/educ42.htm (accessed February 15, 2006).
ClarkeJ. NancarrowSocial inequity, disease, and death in Canada: Class, race and ethnicity. In Health, Illness, and Medicine in Canada. Oxford University Press, Toronto, ON, 2004.
56.
BolariaB. S.Income inequality, poverty, food banks, and health. In Health, Illness and Health Care in Canada, ed. BolariaB. S.DickinsonH. D., pp. 131–143. Nelson Thomson Learning, Scarborough, ON, 2002.
57.
CrowleyP.Primary Care Trusts involving the community: Is community development the way forward?J. Manage. Med.16:311–322, 2002.
