Following the 2006 election, the Swedish earner-carer model of family policy seems to have come to an important crossroads, and questions have been raised about the future course of policies. Will the prototypical earner-carer model in Sweden persist? The separate reforms in cash transfers, services, and tax systems in several respects seem to point in contradictory directions, simultaneously introducing new principles of social care. In this article, past and present reforms and potential outcomes of policies are discussed from an institutional and comparative perspective. Reviewing research on outcomes of earner-carer policies for gendered patterns of productive and reproductive work, class-based stratification, child well-being, fertility, and work–family conflict, the article also contributes to the discussion about future challenges for family policy institutions in Sweden and other advanced welfare states.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
HernesH. M.Welfare State and Woman Power: Essays in State Feminism.Norwegian University Press, Oslo, 1987.
2.
LewisJ.Gender and the development of welfare regimes. J. Eur. Soc. Policy2(3): 159–173, 1992.
3.
SainsburyD.Gender Equality and Welfare States.Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996.
4.
GornickJ. C., and MeyersM. K.Creating gender egalitarian societies: An agenda for reform. Polit. Soc.36(3):313–349, 2008.
5.
SundströmM., and StaffordF.Female labour force participation, fertility and public policy in Sweden. Eur. J. Popul.8:199–215, 1992.
6.
FerrariniT.Families, States, and Labour Markets: Institutions, Causes, and Consequences of Family Policy in Post-War Welfare States.Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, 2006.
7.
NeyerG., and AnderssonG.Consequences of family policies on childbearing: Effects or artefacts?Popul. Dev. Rev.34(4):699–724, 2008.
8.
OláhL. S., and BernhardtE.Sweden: Combining childbearing and gender equality. Demogr. Res.19:1105–1144, 2008.
9.
KangasO., and PalmeJ.Does social policy matter? Poverty cycles in OECD countries. Int. J. Health Serv.30(2):335–352, 2000.
10.
MisraJ.BudigM. J., and MollerS.Work-family policies and poverty for partnered and single women in Europe and North America. Gend. Soc.21(6):804–827, 2007.
11.
HuberE.Politics of women's economic independence. Soc. Polit.16(1):1–39, 2009.
12.
TanakaS.Parental leave and child health across OECD countries. Econ. J.115:7–28, 2005.
13.
LundbergO.The role of welfare state principles and generosity in social policy programmes for public health: An international comparative study. Lancet372:1633–1640, 2008.
14.
StrandhM., and NordenmarkM.The interference of paid work with household demands in different social policy contexts. Br. J. Sociol.57(4):597–617, 2006.
15.
Datta GuptaN., and SmithN.Children and Career Interruptions: The Family Gap in Denmark. Discussion Papers 263. Institute for the Study of Labor, Bonn, 2001.
16.
MandelH., and SemyonovM.Family policy, wage structures, and gender gaps: Sources of earnings inequality in 20 countries. Am. Sociol. Rev.70:949–967, 2005.
17.
MandelH., and SemyonovM.A welfare state paradox: State interventions and women's employment opportunities in 22 countries. Am. J. Sociol.111(6):1910–1949, 2006.
18.
OrloffA. S.Gender and the social rights of citizenship: The comparative analysis of gender relations and welfare states. Am. Sociol. Rev.58:303–328, 1993.
19.
O'ConnorJ. S.OrloffA. S., and ShaverS.States, Markets, Families: Gender, Liberalism, and Social Policy in Australia, Canada, Great Britain, and the United States.Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999.
20.
KorpiW.Faces of inequality: Gender, class, and patterns of inequalities in different types of welfare states. Soc. Polit.7(2):127–191, 2000.
21.
GornickJ. C.MeyersM. K., and RossK. E.Supporting the employment of mothers: Policy variation across fourteen welfare states. J. Eur. Soc. Policy7(1):45–70, 1997.
22.
GornickJ. C., and MeyersM. K.Families That Work: Policies for Reconciling Parenthood and Employment.Russell Sage Foundation, New York, 2003.
23.
KorpiW.FerrariniT., and EnglundS.Egalitarian Gender Paradise Lost? Re-examining Gender Inequalities in Different Types of Welfare States. Paper presented at Equalsoc Conference, Berlin, May 11, 2009.
24.
QuadagnoJ.Another face of inequality: Racial and ethnic exclusion in the welfare state. Soc. Polit.7(2):229–237, 2000.
25.
OhlanderA.-S.Det osynliga barnet? Kampen om den socialdemokratiska familjepolitiken. In Socialdemokratins Samhälle 1889–1989, ed. MisgeldK.MolinK., and ÅmarkK., pp. 170–190. Tiden, Kristianstad, 1988.
26.
HuberE., and StephensJ. D.Partisan governance, women's employment and the social democratic service state. Am. Sociol. Rev.65(3):323–342, 2000.
27.
HobsonB., and LindholmM.Collective identities, women's power resources, and the making of welfare states. Theor. Soc.26(4):475–508, 1997.
28.
MontanariI.From family wage to marriage subsidy and child benefits: Controversy and consensus in the development of family support. J. Eur. Soc. Policy10(4):307–333, 2000.
29.
DuvanderA.-Z.Family Policy in Sweden 2008. Social Insurance Report 2008:15. Swedish Social Insurance Agency, Stockholm, 2008.
30.
DuvanderA.-Z.När är det dags för dagis? En studie om vid vilken ålder barn börjar förskola och föräldrars åsikt om detta. Working Paper 2006:2. Institute for Future Studies, Stockholm, 2006.
31.
BergqvistC., and NybergA.Welfare state restructuring and child care in Sweden. In Child Care Policy at the Crossroads: Gender and Welfare State Restructuring, ed. MichelS. and MahonR., pp. 287–307. Routledge, London, 2002.
32.
Swedish National Agency for Education. Children, Pupils, and Staff. National Level Report 298. Swedish National Agency for Education, Stockholm, 2007.
33.
Swedish National Agency for Education. Lärare inom förskola, skola och vuxenut-bildning 2006 års prognos över behov av och tillgång på lärare perioden 2005–2019.Stockholm, 2006.
34.
Swedish National Agency for Education. Barn och personal i förskola 2006.Enheten för utbildningsstatistik. Stockholm, 2007.
35.
FerrariniT.Barnbidraget i internationellt perspektiv: De kontanta och skattebaserade barnbidragens utveckling och koppling till barnfattigdom i Sverige och andra välfärdsdemokratier 1930–2000. Working Papers in Social Insurance 2009:2. Swedish Social Insurance Agency, Stockholm, 2009.
36.
SchiratzkiJ.Custody of children in Sweden: Recent developments. Scand. Stud. Law38:255–262, 1999.
37.
Statistics Sweden. Barn och deras familjer 2006. Demografiska rapporter 2007:4. Stockholm, 2007.
38.
Datta GuptaN.SmithN., and VernerM.The impact of Nordic countries' family friendly policies on employment, wages, and children. Rev. Econ. Household6:65–89, 2008.
39.
MontanariI.Europe, women, and work: Is the “adult worker” ideal achieved?Int. J. Health Serv.39(2): 245–269, 2009.
40.
HobsonB., and TakahashiM.The parent-worker model: Lone mothers in Sweden. In Lone Mothers in European Welfare Regimes: Shifting Policy Logics, ed. LewisJ., pp. 121–139. Jessica Kingsley, London, 1997.
41.
RuhmC. J., and TeagueJ. L.Parental Leave Policies in Europe and North America. Working Paper 5065. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, 1995.
42.
WinegardenC. R., and BracyM.Demographic consequences of maternal-leave programs in industrial countries: Evidence from fixed-effect models. South. Econ.61(4):1020–1035, 1995.
43.
RönsenM.Assessing the impact of parental leave: Effects on fertility and female employment. In Parental Leave: Progress or Pitfall? Research and Policy Issues in Europe, ed. MossP. and DevenF., pp. 193–225. NIDI/CBGS Publications, The Hague/Brussels, 2000.
44.
RönsenM., and SundströmM.Family policy and after-birth employment among new mothers: A comparison of Finland, Norway and Sweden. Eur. J. Popul.18(2): 121–152, 2002.
45.
GustafssonS., and StaffordF.Child care subsidies and labor supply in Sweden. J. Hum. Resour.27(1):204–230, 1992.
46.
PylkkänenE., and SmithN.The Impact of Family-Friendly Policies in Denmark and Sweden on Mothers' Career Interruptions Due to Childbirth. Discussion Paper No. 1050. Institute for the Study of Labor, Bonn, 2004.
47.
KangasO., and RostgaardT.Preferences or institutions? Work–family life opportunities in seven European countries. J. Eur. Soc. Policy17(3):240–256, 2007.
48.
LundinD.MörkE., and ÖckertB.Maxtaxa inom barnomsorgen—påverkar den hur mycket föräldrar arbetar? Working Paper 2007:2. Institute for Labor Market Policy Evaluation, Uppsala, 2007.
49.
EvertssonM., and DuvanderA.-Z.Parental Leave—Possibility or Trap? Does Family Leave Length Affect Swedish Women's Labour Market Opportunities? SPaDE Working Paper 2009:2. Demography Unit, Stockholm University, 2009.
50.
JonssonJ. O., and MillsC.The sooner the better? Parental leave duration and women's occupational career. In Cradle to Grave: Life-Course Change in Modern Sweden, ed. JonssonJ. and MillsC., pp. 97–114. Sociology Press, Durham, UK, 2001.
51.
GranqvistL., and PerssonH.Kvinnor och mäns karriärvägar på den svenska arbetsmarknaden. In Den Könsuppdelade Arbetsmarknaden, ed. Åsa Löfström. SOU 2004:43. Fritzes, Stockholm, 2004.
52.
AlbrechtJ. W.Career interruptions and subsequent earnings: A reexamination using Swedish data. Hum. Resour.34:294–311, 1999.
53.
Björk Eydal, G. and Gislason, I. V. Paid parental leave in Iceland: History and context. In Equal Rights to Earn and Care: Parental Leave in Iceland, ed. Björk EydalG. and GislasonI. V., pp. 15–44. University of Iceland, Reykjavik, 2008.
54.
Swedish Social Insurance Agency. Försäkringskassans årsredovisning 2008.Stockholm, 2009.
55.
EkbergJ.ErikssonR., and FriebelG.Parental Leave: A Policy Evaluation of the Swedish “Daddy-Month” Reform. Discussion Paper Series no 1617. Institute for the Study of Labor, Bonn, 2005.
56.
ErikssonH.Är det verkligen ekonomin som styr? En studie av ekonomiska drivkrafter vid vård av barn. Working Papers in Social Insurance 2009:1. Swedish Social Insurance Agency, Stockholm, 2009.
57.
HaasL. and HwangP.The impact of taking parental leave on fathers' participation in childcare and relationships with children: Lessons from Sweden. Community Work Fam.11(1):85–104, 2008.
58.
DuvanderA.-Z., and JansA.Consequences of fathers' parental leave use: Evidence from Sweden. In Finnish Yearbook of Population Research, Special Issue of the 16th Nordic Demographic Symposium in Helsinki, June 5–7, 2008, pp. 51–62.
59.
AnderssonG.The impact of labour-force participation on childbearing behaviour: Pro-cyclical fertility in Sweden during the 1980s and 1990s. Eur. J. Popul.16: 293–333, 2000.
60.
DuvanderA.-Z., and OlssonS.När har vi råd att skaffa barn? RFV analyserar, 2001:8. National Social Insurance Board, Stockholm, 2001.
61.
DuvanderA.-Z., and AnderssonG.När har vi råd med fler barn? En studie om hur inkomst påverkar fortsatt barnafödande. RFV analyserar 2003:8. National Social Insurance Board, Stockholm, 2003.
62.
ThalbergS.Childbearing of Students: The Case of Sweden. Report No. 2009:6. Institute for Futures Studies, Stockholm, 2009.
63.
OláhL. S.Gendering fertility: Second births in Sweden and Hungary. Popul. Res. Policy Rev.22:171–200, 2003.
64.
DuvanderA.-Z., and AnderssonG.Gender equality and fertility in Sweden: A study on the impact of the father's uptake of parental leave on continued childbearing. Marriage Fam. Rev.39:121–142, 2006.
65.
FrejkaT.Parity distribution and completed family size in Europe: Incipient decline of the two-child family model?Demogr. Res.19:47–72, 2008.
66.
RainwaterL., and SmeedingT. M.Doing Poorly: The Real Income of American Children in a Comparative Perspective. Luxembourg Income Study Working Paper 127. Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, 1995.
67.
BäckmanO., and FerrariniT.Combating child poverty? A multilevel assessment of family policy institutions and child poverty in 21 old and new welfare states. J. Soc. Policy39(2):275–296, 2010.
68.
DuncanG. J.How much does childhood poverty affect the life chances of children?Am. Sociol. Rev.63(3):406–423, 1998.
69.
FerrariniT.Parental Leave Institutions in Eighteen Post-War Welfare States. Swedish Institute for Social Research Doctoral Dissertation Series No. 58. Stockholm, 2003.
70.
Swedish National Institute of Public Health. Child Day Care Center or Home Care for Children 12–40 Months of Age: What Is Best for the Child?Östersund, 2009.
71.
AnderssonB.-E.Effects of day-care on cognitive and socioemotional competence of thirteen-year-old Swedish schoolchildren. Child Dev.63(1):20–36, 1992.
72.
AnderssonB.-E.Public policies and early childhood education. Eur. Early Child. Educ. Res. J.2(2):19–32.
73.
LiuQ., and Nordström SkansO.The Duration of Paid Parental Leave and Children's Scholastic Performance. Working Paper 2009:14. Institute for Labour Market Policy Evaluation, Uppsala, 2009.
74.
Brooks-GunnJ.Do You Believe in Magic? What We Can Expect from Early Childhood Intervention Programs. Social Policy Report, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 1–14. Society for Research in Child Development, Washington, DC, 2003.
75.
GreggP.The effects of a mother's return to work decision on child development in the UK. Econ. J.115(501):48–80, 2005.
76.
HallbergD., and KlevmarkenJ.Time for children: A study of parent's time allocation. J. Popul. Econ.16:205–226, 2003.
77.
RuhmC. J.Parental leave and child health. J. Health Econ.19:931–960, 2000.
78.
CromptonR., and LyonetteC.Work–life “balance” in Europe. Acta Sociol.49(4): 379–393, 2006.
79.
EsserI., and FerrariniT.Dubbla roller, dubbel stress? Familjepolitik, barn och stress i Sverige och andra välfärdsstater. In Halvvägs eller vilse, ed. LindbergI., pp. 19–38. Atlas, Stockholm, 2007.
80.
EdlundJ.The work-family time squeeze: Conflicting demands of paid and unpaid work among working couples in 29 countries. Int. J. Comp. Sociol.48(6):451–480, 2007.
81.
GrönlundA., and HallerödB.Jämställdhetens pris.Borea bokförlag, Umeå, 2008.
82.
SköldL.Hushållsnära tjänster – mest för höginkomsttagare. Välfärd No. 2. Statistics Sweden, Stockholm, 2009.
83.
DuvanderA.-Z.Hur påverkar jämställdhetsbonus och vårdnadsbidrag barnfamiljernas ekonomi?Swedish Social Insurance Agency, Stockholm, 2008.
84.
GottschallK., and BirdK.Family leave policies and labor market segregation in Germany: Reinvention or reform of the male breadwinner model?Rev. Policy Res.20(1):115–134, 2003.
85.
MorganK. J., and ZippelK.Paid to care: The origins and effects of care leave policies in Western Europe. Soc. Polit.10(1):49–85, 2003.
86.
RönsenM.Impacts on Women's Work and Child Care Choices of Cash-for-Care Programs. Documents 2000/13. Statistics Norway, Oslo, 2000.
87.
RönsenM.Fertility and family policy in Norway: A reflection on trends and possible connections. Demogr. Res.10(10):265–286, 2004.
88.
BaklienB.GulbrandsenL., and EllingsaeterL.Evaluering av Kontantstötteordningen.Norwegian Research Council, Oslo, 2001.
89.
PettersenS. V.Barnefamiliers tilsynsordninger, yrkesdeltakelse og bruk av kontantståtte våren 2002. Reports 2003/9. Statistics Norway, Oslo, 2003.
