The Conservative-led government in the United Kingdom is embarking on massive changes to the National Health Service in England. These changes will create a competitive market in both purchasing and provision. Although the opposition Labour Party has stated its intention to repeal the legislation when it regains power, this may be difficult because of provisions of competition law derived from international treaties. Yet there is an alternative, illustrated by the decision of the devolved Scottish government to reject competitive markets in health care.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
LetwinO.Bringing about the phenomenon. In Privatising the World: A Study of International Privatisation in Theory and Practice, p. 74. Cassell, London, 1988.
2.
SextonS.GATS, privatisation and health. In Conference Proceedings: Service without Borders? Privatisation—GATS and the Consequences for Women. Cologne, Germany, May 11, 2003.
3.
ReynoldsL., and McKeeM.“Any qualified provider” in the NHS reforms: But who will qualify?Lancet, doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61264-6.
PollockA. M., and PriceD.The BetterCare judgment—A challenge to health care: European competition law may cover publicly funded, privately provided care. BMJ326: 236, 2003, doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7383.236.
WoolhandlerS., and HimmelsteinD.Competition in a publicly funded healthcare system: Are the UK and other countries right to adopt a market based model for improving their health services?BMJ335: 1126, 2007, doi: 10.1136/bmj.39400.549502.94.
11.
PollockA., and PriceD.The public health implications of world trade negotiations on the general agreement on trade in services and public services. Lancet362: 1072–1075, 2003.
12.
PollockA. M., and PriceD.Rewriting the regulations: How the World Trade Organisation could accelerate privatisation in health-care systems. Lancet356: 1995–2000, 2000.
