This article draws on the vast evidence that suggests, on one hand, that socioeconomic inequalities in health are present in every society in which they have been measured and, on the other hand, that the size of inequalities varies substantially across societies. We conduct a comparative case study of the United States and Canada to explore the role of neoliberalism as a force that has created inequalities in socioeconomic resources (and thus in health) in both societies and the roles of other societal forces (political, economic, and social) that have provided a buffer, thereby lessening socioeconomic inequalities or their effects on health. Our findings suggest that, from 1980 to 2008, while both the United States and Canada underwent significant neoliberal reforms, Canada showed more resilience in terms of health inequalities as a result of differences in: (a) the degree of income inequality, itself resulting from differences in features of the labor market and tax and transfer policies, (b) equality in the provision of social goods such as health care and education, and (c) the extent of social cohesiveness across race/ethnic- and class-based groups. Our study suggests that further attention must be given to both causes and buffers of health inequalities.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
LinkB. G., and PhelanJ.Social conditions as fundamental causes of disease. J. Health Soc. Behav.35: 80–94, 1995.
2.
SiddiqiA.Variation of socioeconomic gradients in children's developmental health across advanced capitalist societies: Analysis of 22 OECD nations. Int. J. Health Serv. 37(1): 63–87, 2007.
3.
SiddiqiA., and NguyenQ. C.A cross-national comparative perspective on racial inequities in health: The USA versus Canada. J. Epidemiol. Community Health64(1): 29–35, 2010.
4.
JonesC.Levels of racism: A theoretic framework and a gardener's tale. Am. J. Public Health90(8): 1212–1215, 2000.
5.
DoyalL.Gender equity in health: Debates and dilemmas. Soc. Sci. Med.51(6): 931–939, 2000.
6.
KamermanS.Social Policies, Family Types, and Child Outcomes in Selected OECD Countries. Social, Employment, and Migration Working Papers, No. 6. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2003.
7.
SiddiqiA., and HertzmanC.Towards an epidemiological understanding of the effects of long-term institutional changes on population health: A case study of Canada versus the USA. Soc. Sci. Med.64(3): 589–603, 2007.
8.
AdlerN. E., and StewartJ.Health disparities across the lifespan: Meaning, methods, and mechanisms. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.1186(1): 5–23, 2010.
9.
NavarroV.Politics and health outcomes. Lancet368(9540): 1033–1037, 2006.
10.
HarveyD.A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford University Press, New York, 2007.
11.
BouchardG.Collective imaginaries and population health: How health data can highlight cultural history. In Successful Societies: How Institutions and Culture Affect Health, ed. HallP. and LamontM.. Cambridge University Press, New York, 2009.
12.
EvansP., and SewellW. H.Jr.The neoliberal era: Ideology, policy, and social effects. Unpublished paper.
13.
CoburnD.Income inequality, social cohesion and the health status of populations: The role of neo-liberalism. Soc. Sci. Med.51(1): 135–146, 2000.
14.
DowW. H., and RehkopfD. H.Socioeconomic gradients in health in international and historical context. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.1186(1): 24–36, 2010.
15.
LundbergO.The Nordic Experience: Welfare States and Public Health. Centre for Health Equity Studies, Stockholm, 2008.
16.
JensonJ., and Saint-MartinD.New routes to social cohesion? Citizenship and the social investment state. Can. J. Sociol.28(1): 77–99, 2003.
17.
KawachiI., and BerkmanL. F.Social cohesion, social capital, and health. In Social Epidemiology, ed. BerkmanL. F. and KawachiI.. Oxford University Press, New York, 2000.
18.
LipsetS. M.Historical traditions and national characteristics: A comparative analysis of Canada and the United States. Can. J. Sociol.11(2): 113–155, 1986.
19.
HallP. A., and SoskiceD.An introduction to varieties of capitalism. In Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, ed. HallP. A. and SoskiceD.. Oxford University Press, New York, 2001.
20.
Esping-AndersenG.The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1990.
21.
SiddiqiA.ZuberiD., and NguyenQ. C.The role of health insurance in explaining immigrant versus non-immigrant disparities in access to health care: Comparing the United States to Canada. Soc. Sci. Med.69(10): 1452–1459, 2009.
PrusS. G.TfailyR., and LinZ.Comparing racial and immigrant health status and health care access in later life in Canada and the United States. Can. J. Aging/Revue canadienne du vieillissement29(3): 383–395, 2010.
25.
EngK., and FeenyD.Comparing the health of low income and less well educated groups in the United States and Canada. Popul. Health Metrics5(10), 2007. doi:10.1186/1478-7954-5-10.
26.
BramleyD.Indigenous disparities in disease-specific mortality, a crosscountry comparison: New Zealand, Australia, Canada, and the United States. N. Z. Med. J.117(1207): 1–16, 2004.
27.
XuJ.Deaths: Final Data for 2007. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC, 2010.
28.
IrwinL.SiddiqiA., and HertzmanC.Early Child Development: A Powerful Equalizer. World Health Organization, Geneva, 2007.
29.
NewmanK. S.No Shame in My Game: The Working Poor in the Inner City. Russel Sage Foundation, New York, 1999.
30.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. OECD Statistics Portal. 2011.
31.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. OECD Social Expenditure Database (SOCX). 2011.
32.
Institute of Medicine. America's Uninsured Crisis: Consequences for Health and Health Care. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC, 2009.
33.
Foundation THJKF. The Uninsured: A Primer. 2007.
34.
FeinsteinJ. S.The relationship between socioeconomic status and health: A review of the literature. Milbank Q.71(2): 279–322, 1993.
35.
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. UNESCO Statistical Database. 2011.
36.
MasseyD., and DentonN.American Apartheid: Segregation and the Making of the Underclass. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1993.
37.
LipsetS. M.Continental Divide: The Values and Institutions of the United States and Canada. Routledge, New York, 1990.
38.
KawachiI.Income inequality and health: Pathways and mechanisms. Health Serv. Res.34(1 Pt 2): 215–227, 1999.
39.
Statistics Canada. Perspectives on Labour and Income: Statistics Canada. Report No.: 75–001-X. 2009.
40.
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Union Members Summary. January 21, 2011.
41.
Fourcade-GourinchasM., and BabbS. L.The rebirth of the liberal creed: Paths to neoliberalism in four countries. Am. J. Sociol.108(3): 533–579, 2002.
42.
MylesJ., and PiersonP.Friedman's revenge: The reform of ‘liberal’ welfare states in Canada and the United States. Polit. Soc.25: 443–472, 1997.
43.
KawachiI.DanielsN., and RobinsonD. E.Health disparities by race and class: Why both matter. Health Aff. 24(2): 343–352, 2005.
44.
HancockA.-M.The Politics of Disgust: The Public Identity of the Welfare Queen. New York University Press, New York, 2004.
45.
NavarroV.Race or class versus race and class: Mortality differentials in the United States. Lancet336(8725): 1238–1240, 1990.
46.
BantingK., and KymlickaW.Do Multicultural Policies Erode the Welfare State? Luxembourg Income Study Working Paper No. 366, 2003.
47.
BloemraadI.Unity in diversity? Bridging models of multiculturalism and immigrant integration. Du Bois Rev. 4(2): 317–336, 2007.
48.
WhiteM. J.FongE., and CaiQ.The segregation of Asian-origin groups in the United States and Canada. Soc. Sci. Res.32: 148–167, 2003.
49.
ZuberiD.Differences That Matter: Social Policy and the Working Poor in the United States and Canada. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, 2006.
50.
GilensM.Why Americans Hate Welfare: Race, Media, and the Politics of Anti-Poverty Policy. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1999.
51.
RossN. A.Relation between income inequality and mortality in Canada and in the United States: Cross-sectional assessment using census data and vital statistics. BMJ320(7239): 898–902, 2000.
52.
SanmartinC.Comparing health and health care use in Canada and the United States. Health Aff. 25(4): 1133–1142, 2006.
53.
KriegerN.Discrimination and health. In Social Epidemiology, ed. KawachiI. and BerkmanL.. Oxford University Press, New York, 2000.
54.
RoseD.Economic determinants and dietary consequences of food insecurity in the United States. J. Nutr.129(2SSuppl): 517S–520S, 1999.
55.
FordE. S.Physical activity behaviors in lower and higher socioeconomic status populations. Am. J. Epidemiol.133(12): 1246–1256, 1991.
56.
AdlerN. E., and OstroveJ. M.Socioeconomic status and health: What we know and what we don't. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci.896(1): 3–15, 1999.
57.
KeatingD.Social interactions in human development: Pathways to health and capabilities. In Successful Societies: Institutions, Cultural Repertoires and Population Health, ed. HallP. and LamontM.. Cambridge University Press, New York, 2009.
58.
McEwenB. S., and GianarosP. J.Central role of the brain in stress and adaptation: Links to socioeconomic status, health, and disease. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci.1186(1): 190–222, 2010.
59.
GeronimusA. T.‘Weathering’ and age patterns of allostatic load scores among blacks and whites in the United States. Am. J. Public Health96(5): 826–833, 2006.
60.
DowdJ. B.SimanekA. M., and AielloA. E.Socio-economic status, cortisol and allostatic load: A review of the literature. Int. J. Epidemiol.38(5): 1297–1309, 2009.
61.
BakerJ. L.OlsenL. W., and SørensenT. I. A.Weight at birth and all-cause mortality in adulthood. Epidemiol. 19(2): 197–203, 2008. doi: 10.1097/EDE. 0b013e31816339c6.
62.
LamontM.Responses to racism, health, and social inclusion as a dimension of successful societies. In Successful Societies: How Institutions and Culture Affect Health, ed. HallP. and LamontM.. Cambridge University Press, New York, 2009.
63.
HertzmanC., and BoyceT.How experience gets under the skin to create gradients in developmental health. Ann. Rev. Public Health31(1): 329–347, 2010.
64.
GaleaS.Estimated deaths attributable to social factors in the United States. Am. J. Public Health101(8): 1456–1465, 2011. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2010.300086.
65.
McLeodC.How society shapes the health gradient: Work-related health inequalities in a comparative perspective. Ann. Rev. Public Health33: 59–73, 2012.
