Developing the Computer User Self-Efficacy (Cuse) Scale: Investigating the Relationship between Computer Self-Efficacy,Gender and Experience with Computers

Abstract

The article describes the development and validation of the 30-item Computer User Self-efficacy (CUSE) Scale. Self-efficacy beliefs have been identified as a factor which may contribute to the success with which a task is completed. Because of the increasing reliance on computer technologies in all aspects of life, it is important that the construct is measured accurately and appropriately. In particular, the article focuses on the measurement of computer self-efficacy in student computer users and its relevance to learning in higher education. The scale was found to have high levels of internal and external reliability and construct validity. Results also showed there to be significant positive correlations between CSE and computer experience, familiarity with computer software packages (which were significant predictors of CSE) and that owning a computer and computer training increased CSE. In addition, males showed significantly higher CSE than females. It is suggested that the scale may be used to identify individuals, in particular students, who will find it difficult to exploit a learning environment which relies heavily on computer technologies. Once identified, motivational and personal control issues can be addressed with these individuals.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bandura

, Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1986.

Rotter

J. B.

, Generalised Expectancies for Internal Versus External Control Reinforcement, Psychological Monographs, 80: 1, 1966.

Schwarzer

, Self-Efficacy: Thought Control of Action, Hemisphere, London, 1992.

Eachus

, Development of the Health Student Self-Efficacy Scale, Perceptual and Motor Skills, 77, p. 670, 1993.

Eachus

and Cassidy

, Self-Efficacy, Locus of Control and Styles of Learning as Contributing Factors in the Academic Performance of Student Health Professionals, Proceedings of the First Regional Congress of Psychology for Professionals in the Americas, Mexico City, 1997.

Eachus

, Locus of Control, Self-Efficacy and Attributional Style of Investment Professionals, unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Manchester Metropolitan University, 1994.

Compeau

D. R.

and Higgins

C. A.

, Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test, MIS Quarterly, June 1995.

Hill

Smith

N. D.

, and Mann

M. F.

, Role of Efficacy Expectations in Predicting the Decision to Use Advanced Technologies: The Case of Computers, Journal of Applied Psychology, 72: 2, pp. 307–313, 1987.

Torkzadeh

and Koufteros

, Factorial Validity of a Computer Self-Efficacy Scale and the Impact of Computer Training, Education and Psychological Measurement, 54: 3, pp. 813–821, 1994.

10.

Ertmer

P. A.

Evenbeck

Cennamo

K. S.

, and Lehman

J. D.

, Enhancing Self-Efficacy for Computer Technologies Through the Use of Positive Classroom Experiences, Educational Technology, Research & Development, 42: 3, pp. 45–62, 1994.

11.

Cassidy

and Eachus

, The Role of Computer Training in Determining Levels of Computer Self-Efficacy in Students, Proceedings of Computers in Psychology (CiP), University of York, United Kingdom, 2000.

12.

Miura

I. T.

, The Relationship of Computer Self-Efficacy Expectations to Computer Interest and Course Enrollment in College, Sex Roles, 16: 5/6, 1987.

13.

Murphy

C. A.

Coover

, and Owen

S. V.

, Development and Validation of the Computer Self-Efficacy Scale, Education and Psychological Measurement, 49, pp. 893–899, 1989.

14.

Busch

, Gender Differences in Self-Efficacy and Attitudes Towards Computers, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12: 2, pp. 147–158, 1995.

15.

Vasil

Hesketh

, and Podd

, Sex Differences in Computing Behaviour Among School Pupils, New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 22: 2, pp. 201–214, 1987.

16.

Lloyd

B. H.

and Gressard

, Reliability and Factorial Validity of Computer Attitude Scales, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 42: 2, pp. 501–505, 1984.

17.

Kinzie

M. B.

and Delcourt

, Computer Technologies in Teacher Education: The Measurement of Attitudes and Self-Efficacy, paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 331 891, 1991.

18.

College is ‘Not Cool’—Women Out Number Men in Student Population [online]; BBC Education, November 17th, 1999. Available at: <URL:http://news1.thdo.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/education/newsid_542000/52467.stm> [Accessed April 2001].

19.

Facts and Figures 2000–2001 [online], University of Sussex Press and Communication Office, available at: <URL:www.sussex.ac.uk/press_office/facts> [Accessed April 2001].

20.

Ballantyne

, Are They Glad They Came? First Year Students Views of Their University Experience, in Flexible Futures in Tertiary Teaching, Herrmann

and Kulski

M. M.

(eds.), Proceedings of the 9th Annual Teaching Learning Forum, Curtin University of Technology, Perth, February 2–4, 2000.

21.

Mortenson

T. G.

, Where Are the Boys? The Growing Gender Gap in Higher Education, College Board Review, 188, pp. 8–17, August 1999.

22.

Koul

and Rubba

, An Analysis of the Reliability and Validity of Personal Internet Teaching Efficacy Beliefs Scale, Electronic Journal of Science Education, 4: 1, 1999.

23.

Decker

C. A.

, Training Transfer: Perceptions of Computer Use Self-Efficacy Among Employees, Journal of Technical and Vocational Education, 14: 2, 1998.

24.

Bryman

and Cramer

, Quantitative Data Analysis with SPSS for Windows, Routledge, London, 1997.

25.

Cassidy

and Eachus

, Learning Style, Academic Belief Systems, Self-Report Student Proficiency and Academic Achievement in Higher Education, Educational Psychology, 20: 3, pp. 307–322, 2000.