A recent series of papers (North American Archaeologist, 2010:255-479) relating to the archaeology of rockshelters assembled an important array of information that illustrates the importance of these locations to understanding the culture history of the greater Northeastern Woodlands region. Paul Raber's contribution specifically addressed the apparent increase in the use of these geological features during the Late Woodland period in Pennsylvania, about 900 to 1650 CE. In Ohio the “Late Woodland” period may be differently defined and assigned completely different dates. Raber suggests that rockshelters became important to aspects of foraging strategies that supplemented the horticultural systems of the village dwelling cultures in central and western Pennsylvania, particularly during the Little Ice Age. I suggest that after 1500 CE rockshelters became important in the temporary storage of peltry, the basis for a vast trading system. The European demand for peltry had rapidly changed traditional trading dynamics among Native Americans, leading to a focus on gaining European goods. The volume and perishable nature of peltry made dry storage an essential part of collecting and trade networks.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BeckerMarshall Joseph1980Lenape Archaeology: Archaeological and Ethnohistoric Considerations in Light of Recent Excavations, Pennsylvania Archaeologist, 50:4, pp. 19–30.
2.
BeckerMarshall Joseph1987aThe Forks of Delaware, Pennsylvania During the First Half of the Eighteenth Century: The Migration of Some “Jerseys” into a Former Shared Resource Area North of Lenape Territory and its Implications for Cultural Boundaries and Identities, Abhandlungen der Völkerkundliche Arbeitsgemeinschaft, 55, Nortorf, West Germany.
3.
BeckerMarshall Joseph1987bThe Moravian Mission in the Forks of the Delaware: Reconstructing the Migration and Settlement Patterns of the Jersey Lenape during the Eighteenth Century through Documents in the Moravian Archives, Unitas Fratrum (Special Issue: “The American Indians and the Moravians”), 21/22, pp. 83–172.
4.
BeckerMarshall Joseph1988A Summary of Lenape Socio-Political Organization and Settlement Pattern at the Time of European Contact: The Evidence for Collecting Bands, Journal of Middle Atlantic Archaeology, 4, pp. 79–83.
5.
BeckerMarshall Joseph1989Lenape Population at the Time of European Contact: Estimating Native Numbers in the Lower Delaware Valley, in Symposium on the Demographic History of the Philadelphia Region, 1600-1860, Susan E. Klepp, editor, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 133:2, pp. 112–122.
6.
BeckerMarshall Joseph1992aThe Lenape of the Historic Contact Period, in The Buried Past: An Archaeological History of Philadelphia, CotterJohn L.RobertsDaniel G., and ParringtonMichael (editors), University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, pp. 17–29.
7.
BeckerMarshall Joseph1992bTeedyuscung's Youth and Hereditary Land Rights in New Jersey: The Identification of the Unalachtigo, Bulletin of the Archaeological Society of New Jersey, 47, pp. 37–60.
8.
BeckerMarshall Joseph1993The Lenape and Other “Delawarean” Peoples at the Time of European Contact: Population Estimates Derived from Archaeological and Historical Sources, The Bulletin; Journal of the New York State Archaeological Association, 105, pp. 16–25.
9.
BeckerMarshall Joseph1995Lenape Maize Sales to the Swedish Colonists: Cultural Stability During the Early Colonial Period, in New Sweden in America, edited by HoffeckerCarol E.WaldronRichardWilliamsLorraine E., and BensonBarbara E. (editors), University of Delaware Press, Newark, Delaware, pp. 121–136.
10.
BeckerMarshall Joseph1998Mehoxy of the Cohansey Band of South Jersey Indians: His Life as a Reflection of Symbiotic Relations with Colonists in Southern New Jersey and the Lower Counties of Pennsylvania, Bulletin of the Archaeological Society of New Jersey, 53, pp. 40–68.
11.
BeckerMarshall Joseph1999Cash Cropping by Lenape Foragers: Preliminary Notes on Native Maize Sales to Swedish Colonists and Cultural Stability During the Early Colonial Period, Bulletin of the Archaeological Society of New Jersey, 54, pp. 45–68.
12.
BeckerMarshall Joseph2004bNative Americans from Toms River: Teedyuscung and His Lenopi Kin, Newsletter of the Archaeological Society of New Jersey, 204(Jan.), pp. 1–4.
13.
BeckerMarshall Joseph2005Matchcoats: Cultural Conservatism and Change, Ethnohistory, 52:4, pp. 727–787.
14.
BeckerMarshall Joseph2006Anadromous Fish and the Lenape, Pennsylvania Archaeologist, 76:2, pp. 28–40.
15.
BeckerMarshall Joseph2008Lenopi, Or, What's in a Name? Interpreting the Evidence for Cultural Boundaries in the Lower Delaware Valley, Bulletin of the Archaeological Society of New Jersey, 63, pp. 11–32.
16.
BeckerMarshall Joseph2010a“Late Woodland” (CA. 1000-1740 CE) Foraging Patterns of the Lenape and Their Neighbors in the Delaware Valley, Pennsylvania Archaeologist, 80:1, pp. 17–31.
17.
BeckerMarshall Joseph2010bThe Armewamus Band of New Jersey: Other Clues to Differences Between the Lenopi and the Lenape, Pennsylvania Archaeologist, 80:2, pp. 61–72.
18.
BeckerMarshall Joseph2010cMatch Coats and the Military: Mass-Produced Clothing for Native Americans as Parallel Markets in the Seventeenth Century, Textile History, 41:1(Suppl), pp. 153–181.
19.
Ms A Mahamickwon and His Kin: Cultural Change and Transformations Within a Central Lenopi Band ca. 1670-1802, Manuscript on file, Becker Archives, West Chester University.
20.
Ms B Bands in Southern New Jersey: Three Variations in Foraging Strategies Among the Lenopi of the Late Woodland Period, manuscript on file, Becker Archives, West Chester University.
21.
In review “Lenape Fishing Revisited: No Salmon in the Raritan or Delaware Rivers, A Even During the Little Ice Age (A Fish-Eye View),” in Climate Change and Archaeology, ClarkeDavid and MeansBernard K., editors.
22.
BraundKatherine E. Holland1993Deerskins and Duffels: The Creek Indian Trade with Anglo-America, 1685-1815, University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln.
23.
BurnsJonathan A. and RaberPaul A.2010Introduction: Rockshelters in Behavioral Context: Archaeological Perspectives from Eastern North America, North American Archaeologist, 31:3-4, pp. 257–285.
24.
EnsorBradley E.2011Kinship Theory in Archaeology: From Critiques to the Study of Transformations, American Antiquity, 76:2, pp. 203–227.
25.
ForrestDaniel2010The Middle to Late Archaic Transition in the Still River Valley of Western Connecticut, Bulletin of the Archaeological Society of Connecticut, 72, pp. 63–72.
26.
MounierR. Alan1975The Indian Head Site Revisited, Bulletin of the Archaeological Society of New Jersey, 32, pp. 1–14.
27.
PhillipsJohn C. and SmurrJ. W.1961The Fur Trade (2 vols.), University of Oklahoma, Norman.
28.
RaberPaul A.2008The Mykut Rockshelter, 36Hu143: An Upland Hunting/Butchering Station in Central Pennsylvania, Archaeology of Eastern North America, 36, pp. 25–62.
29.
RaberPaul A.2010The Intensification of Rockshelter Use in the Late Woodland/Late Prehistoric Period, North American Archaeologist, 31:3-4, pp. 367–403.
30.
BlackSpertzelStaciE.2010Upland Rockshelters and Late Woodland Communities in the Hocking Valley, Southeastern Ohio, North American Archaeologist, 31:3-4, pp. 405–426.
31.
TippinsWilliam H.2007An Inventory of Western Pennsylvania Rockshelters, Pennsylvania Archaeologist, 77:2, pp. 34–69.
