Achieving Healthy School Siting and Planning Policies: Understanding Shared Concerns of Environmental Planners,Public Health Professionals,and Educators
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online May, 2010
Achieving Healthy School Siting and Planning Policies: Understanding Shared Concerns of Environmental Planners,Public Health Professionals,and Educators
Policy decisions regarding the quality of the physical school environment—both, school siting and school facility planning policies—are often considered through the lens of environmental planning, public health, or education policy, but rarely through all three. Environmental planners consider environmental justice issues on a local level and/or consider the regional impact of a school. Public health professionals focus on toxic exposures and populations particularly vulnerable to negative health outcomes. Educators and education policymakers emphasize investing in human capital of both students and staff. By understanding these respective angles and combining these efforts around the common goals of achieving adequacy and excellence, we can work toward a regulatory system for school facilities that recognizes children as a uniquely vulnerable population and seeks to create healthier school environments in which children can learn and adults can work.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
JonesSherry EverettAxelradRobert, and WattigneyWendy A., “Healthy and Safe School Environment, Part II, Physical School Environment: Results from the School Health Policies and Programs Study 2006,”Journal of School Health77 (2007): 544–556.
2.
FrumkinHoward, “Introduction,” in Safe and Healthy School Environments, eds. FrumkinHowardGellerRobert J.Leslie RubinI., and NodvinJanice (New York: Oxford University Press, 2006), 2–9.
3.
JonesSherry EverettBrenerNancy D., and McManusTim, “Prevalence of School Policies, Programs, and Facilities that Promote a Healthy Physical School Environment,”American Journal of Public Health93 (2003): 1570–1575.
4.
YoungE., “Do K-12 School Facilities Affect Education Outcomes? Staff Information Report,”Tennessee State Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations, 2003, http://www.state.tn.us/tacir/PDF_FILES/Education/SchFac.pdf (accessed Sept. 7, 2008).
5.
Committee on Education and Labor, “21st Century High-Performing Public Schools Facilities Act, HR 3021 | Committee on Education and Labor,” June 2008, US House of Representatives, http://edlabor.house.gov/issues/schoolfacilitiesact.shtml (accessed Sept. 16, 2008).
6.
VincentJeffrey M., “Public Schools as Public Infrastructure: Roles for Planning Researchers,”Journal of Planning Education and Research25 (2006): 433–437.
7.
LejanoRaul P.PiazzaBill, and HoustonDouglas, “Rationality as Social Justice and the Spatial-distributional Analysis of Risk,”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy20 (2002): 871–888.
8.
ViolichFrancis, “The City Planning Process: A Framework for Community Education,”Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science302 (1955): 8–16.
9.
People of Color Environmental Leadership Summit, “Principles of Environmental Justice,” 27 Oct. 1991, http://www.ejnet.org/ej/principles.html (accessed Nov. 25, 2008).
10.
SchweizerErrol, “Environmental Justice: An Interview with Robert Bullard,” July 1999, Earth First!, http://www.ejnet.org/ej/bullard.html (accessed Nov. 25, 2008).
LittJill S. and BurkeThomas A., “Uncovering the Historic Environmental Hazards of Urban Brownfields,”Journal of Urban Health79 (4) (2002): 464–481.
15.
EllerbuschFredMackJames, and ShimJeong Seop, “Using the Triad Approach to Expedite the Acquisition of an Abbot District School Site,”Remediation, Spring 2004: 85–105.
16.
Child Proofing Our Communities Campaign, “Building Safe Schools: Invisible Threats, Visible Actions,” Center for Health, Environment, and Justice, December 2005.
17.
StreteskyPaul B. and LynchMichael J., “Environmental Hazards and School Segregation in Hillsborough County, Florida, 1987–1999,”The Sociological Quarterly43 (4) (2002): 553–573.
18.
PastorManuelSaddJames L., and Morello-FroschRachel, “Who's Minding the Kids? Pollution, Public Schools, and Environmental Justice in Los Angeles,”Social Science Quarterly83 (1) (2002): 263–280.
19.
GreenbergMichael, “Should Housing Be Built on Former Brownfield Sites?,”American Journal of Public Health92 (5) (2002): 703–705.
20.
BaumHowell S., “Smart Growth and School Reform: What if We Talked about Race and Took Community Seriously?,”Journal of the American Planning Association70 (1) (2004): 14–26.
21.
MasseyDoug S. and DentonNancy A., American Apartheid: Segregation and the Making of the Underclass (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993).
22.
CrumblingD. M., “Managing Uncertainty in Environmental Decisions: Applying the Concept of Effective Data to Contaminated Sites could Reduce Costs and Improve Cleanups,”Environmental Science and Technology35 (190) (2001): 404A–409A.
23.
CrumblingDeana M., “Summary of the Triad approach,” white paper, Washington D.C.: US EPA, Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation, 25 Mar. 2004 (available online at: www.triadcentral.org/ref/doc/triadsummary.pdf).
24.
GreenbergMichael and Jane LewisM., “Brownfields Redevelopment, Preferences and Public Involvement: A Case Study of an Ethnically Mixed Neighborhood,”Urban Studies37 (13) (2000): 2501–2514.
25.
GowriKrishnan, “Green Building Rating Systems: An Overview,”American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers46 (11) (2004): 56–60.
26.
Christopher WeddingG. and Crawford-BrownDouglas, “Measuring Site-level Success in Brownfield Redevelopment: A Focus on Sustainability and Green Building,”Journal of Environmental Management85 (2) (2007): 483–495.
27.
KatzAshley, “News Release: Schools Rapidly Turning Green Across America: Smart New Designs Boost Learning, Cut School Energy Bills and Provide Better Indoor Environments for Students and Teachers,” 27 Aug. 2008, US Green Building Council, http://www.usgbc.org/Docs/News/Green%20Schools%20Press%20Release_082708.pdf (accessed Oct. 2, 2008).
28.
United States Green Building Council, “Press release: USGBC Launches Nationwide Green Schools Effort: “Fifty for Fifty” Initiative to Engage State Legislators in Every State to Develop Green Schools Caucuses,” 4 Sept. 2008, http://www.usgbc.org/News/PressReleaseDetails.aspx?ID=3811 (accessed Oct. 2, 2008).
LordPeter B., “New School on Polluted Site Energizes Environmental Coalition,”Providence Journal, 15 May 2008.
34.
SenierLaura. “Public Schools and Contaminated Land in Rhode Island: Using Superfund Basic Research Program Research Translation and Community Outreach to Foster Research and Advocacy” (presented at Superfund Basic Research Program Wetterhan Award presentation. 1 Dec. 2008).
Morello-FroschRachelPastorManuel, and SaddJames, “Integrating Environmental Justice and the Precautionary Principle in Research and Policy Making: The Case of Ambient Air Toxics Exposures and Health Risks among Schoolchildren in Los Angeles,”The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science584 (2002): 47–68.
40.
BullardR. D., “Toxic Wastes and Race at Twenty, 1987–2007: Grassroots Struggle to Dismantle Environmental Racism,” United Church of Christ report, 2007, www.ejrc.cau.edu/TWART-light.pdf (accessed Nov. 23, 2008).
41.
AxelradRobert, “Indoor Air Quality,” in Safe and Healthy School Environments, eds. FrumkinHowardGellerRobert J.Leslie RubinI., and NodvinJanice (New York: Oxford University Press, 2006), 2–9.
42.
OrtizFlora Ida, “Essential Learning Conditions for California Youth: Educational Facilities,”Teachers College Record106 (10) (2004): 2015–2031.
43.
HeathG. A. and MendellMark J., “Do Indoor Environments in Schools Influence Student Performance? A Review of the Literature” (presented at Indoor Air Conference Proceedings, 2002).
AlarconWalter A., “Acute Illnesses Associated with Pesticide Exposure at Schools,”Journal of the American Medical Association294 (2005): 455–465.
46.
GreenR. S., “Proximity of California Public Schools to Busy Roads,”Environmental Health Perspectives112 (2004): 61–66.
47.
PastorManuelSaddJames L., and Morello-FroschRachel, “Reading, Writing, and Toxics: Children's Health, Academic Performance, and Environmental Justice in Los Angeles,”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy22 (2004): 271–290.
48.
AndersonSusan, “The School That Wasn't: Politics and Pollution in LA,”The Nation, 5 June 2000: 32–36.
49.
HorowitzJoy, Parts Per Million: The Poisoning of Beverly Hills High School, (New York: Penguin Group, Inc., 2007).
50.
HanushekEric A., “Assessing the Effects of School Resources on Student Performance: An Update,”Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis19 (2) (1997): 141–164.
51.
WayneAndrew and YoungsPeter, “Teacher Characteristics and Student Achievement Gains: A Review,”Review of Educational Research73 (1) (2003): 89–122.
52.
WossmannLudger, “Specifying Human Capital,”Journal of Economic Surveys17 (3) (2003): 239–270.
53.
O'NeillJune, “The Role of Human Capital in Earnings Differences Between Black and White Men,”Journal of Economic Perspectives4 (4) (1990): 25–45.
54.
GreenwaldRobHedgesLarry V., and LaineRichard D., “The Effect of School Resources on Student Achievement,”Review of Educational Research66 (3) (1996): 361–396.
55.
LemastersLinda Kay, “A Synthesis of Studies Pertaining to Facilities, Student Achievement, and Student Behavior” (Ph.D. Dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 1997).
56.
Howard BowersJ. and BurkettCharles W., “Relationship of Student Achievement and Characteristics in Two Selected School Facility Environmental Settings” (presented at Annual International Conference of the Council of Education Facility Planners, Oct. 1987).
57.
DukeDaniel L. and GriesdomJacqueline, Where Our Children Learn Matters: A Report on the Virginia School Facilities Impact Study (Charlottsville, VA: University of Virginia, 1998).
58.
OrellanaMarjorie Faulstich and ThorneBarrie, “Year-Round Schools and the Politics of Time,”Anthropology and Education Quarterly29 (4) (1998): 446–472.
59.
BuckleyJackSchneiderMarkShangYi, “Fix It and They Might Stay: School Facility Quality and Teacher Retention in Washington, D.C.,”Teachers College Record107 (5) (2005): 1107–1123.
60.
LoebSusannaDarling-HammondLinda, and LuczakJohn, “How Teaching Conditions Predict Teacher Turnover in California Schools,”Peabody Journal of Education, 80 (3) (2005): 44–70.
61.
BriffaultRichard, “Adding Adequacy to Equity,” in School Money Trials: The Legal Pursuit of Educational Adequacy, eds. WestMartin R. and PetersonPaul E. (Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, 2007), 25–54.
62.
OakesJeannie, “Investigating the Claims in Williams v. State of California: An Unconstitutional Denial of Education's Basic Tools?,”Teachers College Record106 (10) (2004): 1889–1906.
PicusL. O., “Understanding the Relationship Between Student Achievement and the Quality of Educational Facilities: Evidence from Wyoming,”Peabody Journal of Education80 (3) (2005): 71–95.
65.
HuWinnie, “Despite Tight Economy, New Jersey Presses On With School Projects,”New York Times, 9 Sept. 2008, B4.
66.
AsimovNanette, “Landmark Deal Reached for State's Poor Schools: 1 Million Low-income Students to Get Equal Access to Good Facilities and Textbooks,”San Francisco Chronicle, 11 Aug. 2004.
67.
TimarThomas, “Exploring the Limits of Entitlement: Williams v. State of California,”Peabody Journal of Education80 (3) (2005): 126–153.
68.
American Civil Liberties Union—Southern California, “Williams v. California: The Statewide Impact of Two Years of Implementation,”ACLU Foundation of Southern California and Public Advocates, Inc., Aug. 2007, http://www.decentschools.org/settlement/WilliamsReportWeb2007.pdf (accessed on 9 Dec. 2008).
69.
OakesJeannieRogersJohn, and LiptonMartin, Learning Power: Organizing for Education and Justice (New York, NY: Teachers College Press, 2006).
70.
Morrison and Foerster LLP, “Decent Schools for California,”2008, http://www.decentschools.org (accessed 5 Jan. 2009).
