According to the Dual Process Model of coping with bereavement (DPM; Stroebe & Schut, 1999), adjustment to bereavement involves a flexible oscillation between two types of coping strategies: loss-oriented (LO) and restoration-oriented (RO). This model postulates that extremely anxious or avoidant attachment disturbs the oscillation process by focusing more on one type of strategy, either LO or RO. The present study examined this assumption. We recruited 321 bereaved individuals who had lost a romantic partner. Our results showed that less negative appraisal of bereavement-related stressors, as well as higher use of RO strategies, mediated the link between attachment avoidance and low severity of grief reactions. However, the DPM variables were not found to mediate the link between attachment anxiety and elevated grief reactions. We discuss how these results provide an empirical basis of the DPM.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BoelenP. A., & KlugkistI. (2011). Cognitive behavioral variables mediate the associations of neuroticism and attachment insecurity with prolonged grief disorder severity. Anxiety, Stress & Coping: An International Journal, 24(3), 291–307. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2010.527335
2.
BoelenP. A., & van den BoutJ. (2010). Anxious and depressive avoidance and symptoms of prolonged grief, depression, and posttraumatic stress-disorder. Psychologica Belgica, 50, 49–67. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000121
3.
BoelenP. A.van den HoutM. A., & van den BoutJ. (2006). A cognitive-behavioral conceptualization of complicated grief. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 13(2), 109–128. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2850.2006.00013.x
4.
BonannoG. A., & ManciniA. D. (2008). The human capacity to thrive in the face of potential trauma. Pediatrics, 121, 369–375. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-1648
5.
BowlbyJ. (1980). Attachment and loss: Vol. 3. Loss: Sadness and depression.New York, NY: Basic Books.
6.
BrennanK. A.ClarkC. L., & ShaverP. R. (1998). Self-report measurement of adult attachment: An integrative overview. In SimpsonJ. A. & RholesW. S. (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 46–76). New York, NY: Guilford.
7.
CasertaM. S., & LundD. A. (2007). Toward the development of an Inventory of Daily Widowed Life (IDWL): Guided by the dual process model of coping with bereavement. Death Studies, 31(6), 505–534.
8.
FieldN. P., & SundinE. C. (2001). Attachment style in adjustment to conjugal bereavement. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 18(3), 347–361.
9.
FolkmanS. (2001). Revised coping theory and the process of bereavement. In StroebeM. S.HanssonR. O.StroebeW., & SchutH. (Eds.), Handbook of bereavement research: Consequences, coping, and care (pp. 563–584). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
10.
FraleyR. C., & BonannoG. A. (2004). Attachment and loss: A test of three competing models on the association between attachment-related avoidance and adaptation to bereavement. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(7), 878–890.
11.
HanssonR. O., & StroebeM. S. (2007). Coping with bereavement. In HanssonR. O. & StroebeM. S. (Eds.), Bereavement in late life: Coping, adaptation, and developmental influences (pp. 25–40). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
12.
JergaA. M.ShaverP. R., & WilkinsonR. B. (2011). Attachment insecurities and identification of at-risk individuals following the death of a loved one. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 28(7), 891–914. doi:10.1177/0265407510397987.
13.
LazarusR. S., & FolkmanS. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping.New York, NY: Springer.
14.
MacKinnonD. P.FairchildA. J., & FritzM. S. (2007). Mediation analysis. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 593–614.
15.
MacKinnonD. P.LockwoodC. M.HoffmanJ. M.WestS. G., & SheetsV. (2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 83–104.
16.
MikulincerM., & OrbachI. (1995). Attachment styles and repressive defensiveness: The accessibility and architecture of affective memories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(5), 917–925.
17.
MikulincerM., & ShaverP. R. (2008). An attachment perspective on bereavement. In StroebeM. S.HanssonR. O.SchutH., & StroebeW. (Eds.), Handbook of bereavement research and practice: Advances in theory and intervention (pp. 87–112). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
18.
ParkesC. M. (2006). Love and loss: The roots of grief and its complications.New York, NY: Routledge.
19.
PrigersonH. G.ShearM. K.JacobsS. C.ReynoldsC. F.3rd.MaciejewskiP. K.DavidsonJ. R. (1999). Consensus criteria for traumatic grief. A preliminary empirical test. British Journal of Psychiatry, 174, 67–73.
20.
PrigersonH. G.HorowitzM. J.JacobsS. C.ParkesC. M.AslanM.GoodkinK. (2009). Prolonged grief disorder: Psychometric validation of criteria proposed for DSM-V and ICD-11. PLoS Medicine, 6(8), 1–12. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000121
21.
PrigersonH. O., & JacobsS. C. (2001). Traumatic grief as a distinct disorder: A rationale, consensus criteria, and a preliminary empirical test. In StroebeM. S.HanssonR. O.StroebeW., & SchutH.M. (Eds.), Handbook of bereavement research: Consequences, coping, and care (pp. 613–645). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
22.
ShaverP. R., & TancredyC. M. (2001). Emotion, attachment, and bereavement: A conceptual commentary. In StroebeM. S.HanssonR. O.StroebeW., & SchutH. (Eds.), Handbook of bereavement research: Consequences, coping, and care (pp. 63–88). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
23.
SobelM. E. (1982). Asymptotic intervals for indirect effects in structural equations models. In LeinhartS. (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 290–312). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
24.
StroebeM.BoelenP. A.van den HoutM.StroebeW.SaleminkE., & van den BoutJ. (2007). Ruminative coping as avoidance: A reinterpretation of its function in adjustment to bereavement. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 257(8), 462–472. doi: 10.1007/s00406-007-0746-y
25.
StroebeM. S., & SchutH. (1999). The dual process model of coping with bereavement: Rationale and description. Death Studies, 23, 197–224.
26.
StroebeM., & SchutH. (2010). The dual process model of coping with bereavement: A decade on. Omega: Journal of Death and Dying, 61(4), 273–289. doi: 10.2190/OM.61.4.b
27.
StroebeM. S.SchutH., & StroebeW. (2005). Attachment in coping with bereavement: A theoretical integration. Review of General Psychology, 9, 48–66. doi: 10.1037/1089-2680.9.1.48
28.
van der HouwenK.StroebeM. S.SchutH.StroebeW., & van den BoutJ. (2010). Mediating processes in bereavement: The role of rumination, threatening grief interpretations, and deliberate grief avoidance. Social Science & Medicine, 71(9), 1669–1676. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.06.047
29.
WaymentH. A., & VierthalerJ. (2002). Attachment style and bereavement reaction. Journal of Loss and Trauma, 7, 129–149. doi: 10.1080/153250202753472291
30.
Wijngaards-de MeijL.StroebeM.SchutH.StroebeW.van den BoutJ.van der HeijdenP. (2007). Neuroticism and attachment insecurity as predictors of bereavement outcome. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(2), 498–505. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2006.06.001
31.
ZechE., & ArnoldC. (2011). Attachment and coping with bereavement: Implications for therapeutic interventions with the insecurely attached. In NeimeyerR. A.HarrisD. L.WinokuerH. R., & ThorntonG. F. (Eds.), Grief and bereavement in contemporary society: Bridging research and practice (pp. 23–35). New York, NY: Routledge.
32.
ZechE.Ryckebosch-DayezA.-S., & DelespauxE. (2010). Improving the efficacy of intervention for bereaved individuals: Toward a process-focused psychotherapeutic perspective. Psychologica Belgica, 50(1–2), 103–124.
33.
ZechE.Ryckebosch-DayezA.-S., & DelespauxE. (2013). Validation of the Grief Coping Questionnaire. Manuscript in preparation.
