Obituaries do not only announce the death of a significant other but also provide insights into how a society deals with death according to the norms governing the rituals of individuals within that society. This study aimed at investigating possible differences between German and Dutch obituaries, specifically in terms of visual and textual elements, information about the deceased, and funeral ceremony-related information. Data used to address the research questions were the contents of 240 German and 240 Dutch obituaries published in 10 different newspapers (6 in Germany, 4 in the Netherlands). Results of this study show that statistically significant differences between German and Dutch obituaries exist. While German obituaries use illustrations more than Dutch ones, Dutch obituaries provide more information, in general, than their German counterparts. The types of deceased-related information on German and Dutch obituaries also vary significantly. Moreover, Dutch obituaries provide more funeral ceremony-related information than German obituaries.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Al-AliM. N. (2005). Communicating messages of solidarity, promotion and pride in death announcements genre in Jordanian newspapers. Discourse & Society, 16(1), 5–31. doi:10.1177/0957926505048228
2.
AlfordR. D. (1988). Naming and identity: A cross-cultural study of personal naming practices. New Haven, CT: Human Relations Area Files Press.
3.
AoA. (1993). Management of death and grief in obituary and in memoriam pages of Nigerian newspapers. Psychological Reports, 73(3), 835–842.
4.
AndersonK. A., & HanJ. (2009). An exploration of ageism and sexism in obituary photographs: 1967–1997. Omega: Journal of Death and Dying, 58(4), 335–345. doi:10.2190/OM.58.4.e
5.
BarryE. (2008). From epitaph to obituary. Death and celebrity in eighteenth-century British culture. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 11(3), 259–275. doi:10.1177/1367877908092584
6.
BolkesteinF. (2010). Kulturen leben vom Austausch. Protektionismus schadet der kulturellen Freiheit. Fachzeitschrift Kulturpolitische Mitteilungen, 118(3), 47–49.
7.
BronischF. W. (1984). Die Sprache der Todesanzeigen. Münchner Medizinische Wochenzeitschrift, 16, 510–514; 17, 557–559; 18, 591–593; 19, 630–632.
8.
CihakS. (2009). In tiefer Trauer. Ein inhaltsanalytischer Zeitvergleich von Todesanzeigen in Österreich. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang GmbH.
9.
DeutscherI. (1973). What we say/what we do: Sentiments and acts. Glenview: Scott, Foresman.
10.
DirschauerK. (1973). Der totgeschwiegene Tod. Theologische Aspekte der kirchlichen Bestattung. Bremen: Schünemann Universitätsverlag.
11.
DrescherM. (2002). Theoretische und methodische Aspekte eines kontrastiven Textsortenvergleichs am Beispiel französischer und spanischer Todesanzeigen. In DrescherM. (Ed.) Textsorten im romanischen Sprachvergleich (pp. 41–62). Tübingen: Stauffenburg.
12.
EckkrammerE. M. (1996). Die Todesanzeige als Spiegel kultureller Konventionen: Eine kontrastive Analyse deutscher, englischer, französischer, spanischer, italienischer und portugiesischer Todesanzeigen. Bonn: Romanisten Verlag.
13.
EidM. (2002). The world of obituaries. Gender across cultures and over time. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.
14.
EisenbruchM. (1984). Cross-cultural aspects of bereavement: A conceptual framework for comparative analysis. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry, 8, 283–309.
15.
ErginM. (2012). Religiosity and the construction of death in Turkish death announcements, 1970–2009. Death Studies, 36, 270–291.
16.
FischerN. (2001). Geschichte des Todes in der Neuzeit. Erfurt: Sutton Verlag.
17.
FriesU. (1990). A contrastive analysis of German and English death notices. In FisiakJ. (Ed.), Further Insights into contrastive analysis. Linguistic and literary studies in Eastern Europe (pp. 539–560). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
18.
FowlkesM. R. (1990). The social regulation of grief. Sociological Forum, 5(2), 635–652.
19.
GerhardsJ., & MelzerA. (1996). Die Veränderung der Semantik von Todesanzeigen als Indikator für Säkularisierungsprozesse?Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 25(4), 304–314.
20.
GrümerK-W., & HelmrichR. (1994). Die Todesanzeige. Viel gelesen, jedoch wenig bekannt. Deskription eines wenig erschlossenen Forschungsmaterials. Historical Social Research, 19(1), 60–108.
21.
GudykunstW. B. (1997). Cultural variability in communication: An introduction. Communication Research, 24(4), 327–348.
22.
HalburB., & VandagriffM. (1987). Societal responses after death: A study of sex differences in newspaper death notices for Birmingham, Alabama, 1900–1985. Sex Roles, 17(7/8), 421. doi:10.1007/BF00288145
23.
HallE. T. (1976). Beyond culture. New York, NY: Doubleday.
24.
HausA. (2007). Todesanzeigen in Ost- und Westdeutschland. Ein sprach- und kulturwissenschaftlicher Vergleich. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang GmbH.
25.
HofstedeG. (1984). Culture's consequences. International differences in work-related values. London, UK: Sage Publications.
26.
HofstedeG. (1991). Cultures and organizations—Software of the mind (pp.4). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
27.
HofstedeG. (2001). Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28.
HosselmannB. (2001). Todesanzeigen als memento mori? Eine empirische Untersuchung von Todesanzeigen der Gegenwart. Altenberg: Oros Verlag.
29.
HumeJ. (2000). Obituaries in American culture. Jackson, MS: University Press of Mississippi.
30.
HumeJ., & BressersB. (2010). Obituaries online: New connections with the living-and the dead. Omega: Journal of Death and Dying, 60(3), 255–271. doi:10.2190/OM.60.3.d
31.
KellehearA. (1984). Are we a “death-denying” society? A sociological review. Social Science & Medicine, 18(9), 713–721.
32.
KellehearA. (2002). Grief and lost: Past, present and future. The Medical Journal of Australia, 177(4), 176.
LinthoutD. (2002). Frau Antje und Herr Mustermann: Niederlande für Deutsche (cover page). Berlin: Links Christoph Verlag.
35.
MarksA., & PiggeeT. (1999). Obituary analysis and describing a life lived: The impact of race, gender, age and economic status. Omega: Journal of Death and Dying, 38(1), 37–57.
36.
MarzolI. C. (2006). Coming out of the closet “six feet under”: Textual silences and the social reconstruction of the family stage in the obituary genres. Revista Alicantina de Estudios Inglese, 19, 67–82.
37.
MossM. (2004). Grief on the web. Omega: Journal of Death and Dying, 49(1), 77–81.
38.
MöllerP. (2009). Todesanzeigen. Eine Gattungsanalyse (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Justus-Liebig-Universität: Erlangen.
39.
MosesR. A., & MarelliG. D. (2003). Obituaries and the discursive construction of dying and living. Texas Linguistic Forum, 47, 123–130. Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Symposium about Language and Society, 11–13.
40.
Müller-CallejaR. (1987). Todesanzeige. In BrandP. & SchulzeV. (Ed.), Medienkundliches Handbuch. Die Zeitungsanzeige. Aachen-Hahn, DE: Hahner Verlags-Gesellschaft.
41.
NwoyeO. (1992). Obituary announcements and communicative functions in Nigerian English. World Englishes, 11, 15–27. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-971X.1992.tb00044.x
42.
O'GormanS. (1998). Death and dying in contemporary society: An evaluation of current attitudes and the rituals associated with death and dying and their relevance to recent understandings of health and healing. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 27, 1127–1135.
43.
PanttiM., & SumialaJ. (2009). Till death do us join: Media, mourning rituals and the sacred centre of the society. Media Culture & Society, 31(1), 119–135.
44.
PhillipsJ. B. (2007). The changing presentation of death in the obituary, 1899–1999. Omega: Journal of Death and Dying, 55(4), 325–346.
45.
PilartzK-H. (2000). Einfache Sprache für die Traueranzeige. Der Österreichische Bestatter, 42(3), 97–99.
46.
RothK., & RothJ. (1988). Öffentliche Todesanzeigen (Flugblatt-Nekrologe) in Südosteuropa. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Volkskunde, 91, 253–267.
47.
SchäferJ. (2002). Tod und Trauerrituale in der modernen Gesellschaft. Perspektiven einer alternativen Trauerkultur. Stuttgart, DE: Ibidem Verlag.
48.
SpillnerB. (2002). Tabubrüche in deutschen Todesanzeigen: Ein interkultureller Einfluß?Beiträge des Finnisch-Ungarischen Kultursemiotischen Symposiums 2000: Frankfurt am Main.
49.
StarckN. (2005). Posthumous parallel and parallax: The obituary revival on three continents. Journalism Studies, 6(3), 267–283. doi: 10.1080/14616700500131828
50.
SteinA. J., & WinokuerH. R. (1989). Monday mourning: Managing employee grief. In DokaK. J. (Ed.), Disenfranchised grief: Recognizing hidden sorrow (pp. 91–102). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
51.
StephensonJ. S. (1985). Death, grief, and mourning: Individual and social realities. New York, NY: The Free Press.
52.
Van GennepA. (1909/1960). The rites of passage. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
53.
WebbE.CampbellD.SchwartzR., & SechrestL. (1966). Unobtrusive measures: Nonreactive research in social sciences. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
54.
ZilberfeinF. (1999). Coping with death: Anticipatory grief and bereavement. Generations, 23(1), 69–74.
