This paper posits that the technical communicator probably spends more time engaged in oral communication activity than he does in written; thus, to be an effective technical communicator one needs an appreciation and an understanding of both modes. Differences between oral and written communication, and methods of difference reduction, are discussed for the dimensions of: 1) permanency, 2) style, 3) interactional control, 4) mediation, and 5) effects. The conclusion is drawn that to be effective the technical communicator must develop the ability to produce messages which evoke common understanding among those participating in the communication event.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
EstrinH. A., Engineering Alumni Speak Out About Speech, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 3: 2, pp. 97–101, 1973.
2.
WorkunA. E., Speech for the Technician: A Bibliography, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 4: 3, pp. 331–339, 1974.
3.
EstrinH. A. and MonahanE. J., Effective Oral Presentation of Scientific and Technical Information, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 5: 3, pp. 187–198, 1975.
4.
McLuhanM., Understanding Media, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1964.
5.
BatesonG., Nauen, Second Edition, Stanford University Press, Stanford, California, 1958.
6.
WatzlawickP.BeavinJ. and JacksonD. D., Pragmatics of Human Communication, Norton, New York, 1967.
7.
EadieW. F. and KlineJ. A., Orientations to Interpersonal Communication, Science Research Associates, Chicago, 1976.
8.
McCaskeyD. S., Technical Writing: The Importance of Reader Interest, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 3: 2, pp. 217–221, 1973.
9.
HorowitzM. W., Writing and Speaking: Two Gateways to the Mind, Today's Speech, 12, pp. 16–18, 1964.
10.
LaingR. D.PhillipsonH. and LeeA. R., Interpersonal Perceptions: A Theory and a Method of Research, Tavistock Publications, London, 1966.
11.
LazarsfeldP. F.BerelsonB. and GaudetH., The People's Choice, Duell, Sloan and Pearce, New York, 1944.
12.
RogersM., Mass Media and Interpersonal Communication, Handbook of Communication, de Sola PoolI.SchrammW.FreyF. W.MacCobyN. and ParkerE. B., (eds.), Rand McNally, Chicago, pp. 290–310, 1973.
13.
BlumerH., Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1969.
14.
HartR. P. and BurksD. M., Rhetorical Sensitivity and Social Interaction, Speech Monographs, 39, pp. 75–91, 1972.
15.
ToulminS., Rules and Their Relevance for Understanding Human Behavior, Human Action: Conceptual and Empirical Issues, Second Edition, TheodoreM., (ed.), Academic Press, New York, pp. 185–215, 1974.
16.
EadieW. F. and KlineJ. A., Orientations to Interpersonal Communication, Science Research Associates, Chicago, 1976.
17.
EadieW. F. and BrooksW. D., CSSA Survey: A Look at our Professional Association, Central States Speech Journal, 26, 1975.
18.
SincoffM. Z. and GoyerR. S., Interviewing Methods, Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company, Dubuque, Iowa, 1977.
19.
SincoffM. Z.PacilioJ.Jr.BlattS. J.HuntG. T., and AntonP., Organizational Communication: Perspectives and Prospects, Ohio Speech Journal, 13, 1975.
