The Role of Brief Motivational Intervention on Self-Efficacy and Abstinence in a Cohort of Patients with Alcohol Dependence

Abstract

Objectives:

Brief interventions are effective in reducing heavy drinking in the general population but few studies examined whether it is also effective in alcohol dependent patients, and whether brief intervention increases self-efficacy.

Method:

One hundred and seven patients with alcohol-dependence were randomized in a controlled trial examining the efficacy of a brief motivational intervention on both self-efficacy level and days of abstinence.

Results:

We found that brief motivational interventions had no effect on days of abstinence, nor on self-efficacy, but that high self-efficacy was consistently correlated with a longer period of abstinence, at all assessment-points.

Conclusion:

Self-efficacy appears to be a crucial prognosis factor, and is not influenced by brief motivational interventions. Other types of specific psychotherapy, probably more intensive, may be more efficient in alcohol-dependent patients than motivational interventions.

Keywords

addiction treatment motivation to change

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Vasilaki

Hosier

Cox

. The efficacy of motivational interviewing as a brief intervention for excessive drinking: A meta-analytic review. Alcohol Alcohol 2006; 41(3): 328–335.

Rubak

Sandbaek

Lauritzen

. Motivational interviewing: A systematic review and meta-analysis. British Journal of General Practice 2005; 55(513): 305–312.

Moos

. Theory-based active ingredients of effective treatments for substance use disorders. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 2007; 88(2–3): 109–121.

Maisto

Clifford

Stout

. Factors mediating the association between drinking in the first year after alcohol treatment and drinking at three years. Journal of Student Alcohol and Drugs 2008; 69(5): 728–737.

Breslin

Sobell

. Toward a stepped care approach to treating problem drinkers: The predictive utility of within-treatment variables and therapist prognostic ratings. Addiction 1997; 92(11): 1479–1489.

Saunders

Wilkinson

Phillips

. The impact of a brief motivational intervention with opiate users attending a methadone programme. Addiction 1995; 90(3): 415–424.

Kelly

Lapworth

. The HYP program-targeted motivational interviewing for adolescent violations of school tobacco policy. Preventive Medicine 2006; 43(6): 466–471.

Ingersoll

Cropsey

Heckman

. A test of motivational plus nicotine replacement interventions for HIV positive smokers. AIDS Behavior 2009; 13(3): 545–554

Patten

Decker

Dornelas

. Changes in readiness to quit and self-efficacy among adolescents receiving a brief office intervention for smoking cessation. Psychological Health and Medicine 2008; 13(3): 326–336.

10.

Litt

Kadden

Stephens

. Coping and self-efficacy in marijuana treatment: Results from the marijuana treatment project. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 2005; 73(6): 1015–1025.

11.

Anton

Moak

Latham

. Naltrexone combined with either cognitive behavioral or motivational enhancement therapy for alcohol dependence. Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology 2005; 25(4): 349–357.

12.

Davidson

Gulliver

Longabaugh

. Building better cognitive-behavioral therapy: Is broad-spectrum treatment more effective than motivational-enhancement therapy for alcohol-dependent patients treated with naltrexone? Journal of Student Alcohol and Drugs 2007; 68(2): 238–247.

13.

Cutler

Fishbain

. Are alcoholism treatments effective? The Project MATCH data. BMC Public Health 2005; 5: 75.

14.

Sellman

Sullivan

Dore

. A randomized controlled trial of motivational enhancement therapy (MET) for mild to moderate alcohol dependence. Journal of Student Alcohol 2001; 62(3): 389–396.

15.

Adamson

Sellman

. Five-year outcomes of alcohol-dependent persons treated with motivational enhancement. Journal of Student Alcohol and Drugs 2008; 69(4): 589–593.

16.

Villanueva

Tonigan

Miller

. Response of Native American clients to three treatment methods for alcohol dependence. Journal of Ethnic Substance Abuse 2007; 6(2): 41–48.

17.

Selzer

. The Michigan alcoholism screening test: The quest for a new diagnostic instrument. American Journal of Psychiatry 1971; 127(12): 1653–1658.

18.

Sklar

Turner

. A brief measure for the assessment of coping self-efficacy among alcohol and other drug users. Addiction 1999; 94(5): 723–729.

19.

Miller

Walters

Bennett

. How effective is alcoholism treatment in the United States? Journal of Student Alcohol 2001; 62(2): 211–220.

20.

Gastfriend

Garbutt

Pettinati

. Reduction in heavy drinking as a treatment outcome in alcohol dependence. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 2007; 33(1): 71–80.

21.

Sobell

. Timeline followback: A technique for assessing self-reported alcohol consumption. In Litten

Allen

(eds.), Measuring alcohol consumption: Psychosocial and biochemical methods. Totowa: Humana, 1992.

22.

Match

. Matching alcoholism treatments to client heterogeneity: Project MATCH posttreatment drinking outcomes. Journal of Student Alcohol 1997; 58(1): 7–29.

23.

Shakeshaft

Bowman

Burrows

. Community-based alcohol counselling: A randomized clinical trial. Addiction 2002; 97(11): 1449–1463.

24.

Edwards

Rollnick

. Outcome studies of brief alcohol intervention in general practice: The problem of lost subjects. Addiction 1997; 92(12): 1699–1704.

25.

Hasking

Oei

. Alcohol expectancies, self-efficacy and coping in an alcohol-dependent sample. Addictive Behavior 2007; 32(1): 99–113.

26.

Levin

Ilgen

Moos

. Avoidance coping strategies moderate the relationship between self-efficacy and 5-year alcohol treatment outcomes. Psychology and Addictive Behavior 2007; 21(1): 108–113.

27.

Ilgen

Tiet

Finney

. Self-efficacy, therapeutic alliance, and alcohol-use disorder treatment outcomes. Journal of Student Alcohol 2006; 67(3): 465–472.

28.

Hettema

Steele

Miller

. Motivational interviewing. Annual Review in Clinical Psychology 2005; 1: 91–111.

29.

Holloway

Watson

Arthur

. The effect of brief interventions on alcohol consumption among heavy drinkers in a general hospital setting. Addiction 2007; 102(11): 1762–1770.

30.

Witkiewitz

van der Maas

Hufford

. Nonnormality and divergence in posttreatment alcohol use: Reexamining the Project MATCH data “another way.” Journal of Abnormal Psychology 2007; 116(2): 378–394.

31.

Oei

Hasking

Phillips

. A comparison of general self-efficacy and drinking refusal self-efficacy in predicting drinking behavior. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse 2007; 33(6): 833–841.

32.

Cellucci

Krogh

Vik

. Help seeking for alcohol problems in a college population. Journal of General Psychology 2006; 133(4): 421–433.

33.

Gordon

Sterling

Siatkowski

. Inpatient desire to drink as a predictor of relapse to alcohol use following treatment. American Journal of Addiction 2006; 15(3): 242–245.

34.

Moos

. Rates and predictors of relapse after natural and treated remission from alcohol use disorders. Addiction 2006; 101(2): 212–222.

35.

Fiorentine

Hillhouse

. When low self-efficacy is efficacious: Toward an addicted-self model of cessation of alcohol- and drug-dependent behavior. American Journal of Addiction 2003; 12(4): 346–364.

36.

Fiorentine

Hillhouse

. Replicating the addicted-self model of recovery. Addictive Behavior 2003; 28(6): 1063–1080.

37.

Heather

. Interpreting the evidence on brief interventions for excessive drinkers: The need for caution. Alcohol Alcohol 1995; 30(3): 287–296.

38.

Soderstrom

DiClemente

Dischinger

. A controlled trial of brief intervention versus brief advice for at-risk drinking trauma center patients. Journal of Trauma 2007; 62(5): 1102–1111; discussion 1111–1112.