The attitudes toward death and dying of fourteen students who took a death course were compared with those of a group of students who requested the course but were not able to be accommodated. Those completing the course had higher fear of death scores and rated death more potent on a semantic differential. However, these students also indicated they would feel more comfortable talking with a dying person. Comments on the anonymous course evaluations also suggested that the course had a positive impact.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
FrankJ. D., Persuasion and Healing, 2nd ed., Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 1973.
2.
LanaR., Pretest Sensitization, RosenthalR. and RosnowR. (eds.), Artifacts in Behavioral Research, Academic Press, 1969.
3.
OrneM., On the Social Psychology of the Psychological Experiment: With Particular Reference to Demand Characteristics and Their Implications, American Psychologists, 17, pp. 776–783, 1962.
4.
CronbachL. and FurbyL., How Should we Measure “Change”–Or Should We?, Psychological Bulletin, 74, pp. 68–80, 1970.
5.
Kubler-RossE., On Death and Dying, Macmillan, New York, 1969.
6.
KastenbaumR. and AisenbergR., The Psychology of Death, Springer Publishing, New York, 1972.
7.
TemplerD., The Construction and Validation of a Death Anxiety Scale, Journal of General Psychology, 82, pp. 165–177, 1970.
8.
BellB. D., The Experimental Manipulation of Death Attitudes: A Preliminary Investigation, Omega, 6:3, pp. 199–206, 1975.
9.
LevitonD., Death Education and Change in Students' Attitudes, final research report, National Institute of Mental Health Research Grant MH 21974–01, Washington, D. C., 1973.