Point-of-purchase advertising (POP) is responsible for half of the purchase decisions made in the store. Because of: 1) the influence of POP on the sale of technical consumer products and the economy; 2) our need to understand trends that shape technical and business communication; 3) the intermedial nature of POP (where spoken and written words work with place, visual image, physical structures, and multimedia integrated marketing campaigns); and 4) its theatrical and local nature, we need both a situated and theoretical exploration of POP. Drawing upon three months' participant observation in advertising, I describe a POP composing process in an integrated marketing campaign. Cognitive responses to layout and the interrelation of rhetorical canons are considered for preparing communication for a marketplace that is three-dimensional variegated, noisy, and peripatetic.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AnderW. N., & SternN. Z. (2004). Winning at retail: Developing a sustained model for retail success. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2.
AndersonP. V. (2007). Technical communication. Boston: Thomson Wadsworth.
3.
AreniC. S.DuhanD. F., & KieckerP. (1999). Point-of-purchase displays, product organization, and brand purchase likelihoods. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27(4), 428–441.
4.
BairdR. N.TurnbullA. T., & McDonaldD. (1987). The graphics of communication: Typography, layout, design, production (5th ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
5.
BiancoA. (2007, April 30). Wal-Mart's midlife crisis. Business Week, 46–56.
6.
BroadbentD. E. (1958). Perception and communication. New York: Pergamon Press.
7.
BrumbergerE. R. (2007). Visual communication in the workplace: A survey of practice. Technical Communication Quarterly, 16(4), 369–395.
8.
BurkeK. (1969). A rhetoric of motives. Berkeley: University of California Press.
9.
CampbellG. (1968). The philosophy of rhetoric. In GoldenJ. L. & CorbettE. P. J. (Eds.), The rhetoric of Blair, Campbell, and Whately (pp. 139–272). New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
10.
CarlsonL.GroveS. J.DoerchM. J. (2003). Services advertising and integrated marketing communications: An empirical examination. Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 25(2), 69–82.
11.
ConnollyA., & DavisonL. (1996). Planning for consumer change in Europe 1996/1997. How does design affect decisions at point of sale?, Journal of Brand Management, 4, 100–107.
12.
ConnorsR. J. (1983). Actio: A rhetoric of manuscripts. Rhetoric Review, 2, 64–73.
13.
ConnorsR. J. (1993). Actio: A rhetoric of written delivery (Iteration two). In ReynoldsJ. F. (Ed.), Rhetorical memory and delivery (pp. 65–77). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
14.
CorbettE. P. J. (1990). Classical rhetoric for the modern student. New York: Oxford.
15.
CrossG. A. (1994). Recontextualizing writing: Roles of written texts in multiple media communications. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 8(1), 118–134.
DaytonD., & BernhardtS. A. (2004). Results of a survey of ATTW members, 2003. Technical Communication Quarterly, 13(1), 13–43.
18.
De PelsmakerP.GuensM., & Van den BerghJ. (2001). Marketing communications. Harlow, England: Financial Times/Prentice Hall.
19.
DickinsonG., & MaughC. M. (2004). Placing visual rhetoric: Finding material comfort in Wild Oats Market. In HillC. A. & HelmersM. (Eds.), Defining visual rhetorics (pp. 259–277). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
20.
DillonG. (1981). Constructing texts. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
21.
DraggaS. (1993). The ethics of delivery. In ReynoldsJ. F. (Ed.), Rhetorical memory and delivery (pp. 79–96). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
22.
DraggaS., & GongG. (1989). Editing: The design of rhetoric. Amityville, NY: Baywood.
23.
ElmerJ. (2005, November). Treaty trauma. Paper presented for the Sheehan Lecture at the University of Louisville.
24.
EriksenC. W., & SpencerT. (1969). Rate of information processing in visual perception: Some results and methodological considerations. Journal of Experimental Psychology Monograph, 79, 1–16.
25.
FahnestalkJ. (2001). Arrangement. Encyclopedia of rhetoric (pp. 40–52). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26.
FossS. K. (2004). Framing the study of visual rhetoric: Toward a transformation of rhetorical theory. In HillC. A. & HelmersM. (Eds.), Defining visual rhetorics (pp. 303–314). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
27.
GurakL. J. (2000). Oral presentations for technical communication. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
28.
HaasC., & HayesJ. (1986). What did I just say? Reading problems in writing with the machine. Research in the Teaching of English, 20, 22–35.
29.
HallE. T., & HallM. R. (1990). Understanding cultural differences. Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press, Inc.
30.
HensonL. (1994). A preliminary rhetoric of technical copywriting [electronic version]. Technical Communication, 41(3), 447-ff. Retrieved on February 2, 2007, from Proquest. 7236610.
31.
HornerW. B. (1993). Introduction. In ReynoldsJ. F. (Ed.), Rhetorical memory and delivery (pp. ix–xii). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
32.
InmanJ. J., & WinerS. (1998). Where the rubber meets the road: A model of in-store consumer decision making. Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute.
33.
JamiesonK. (1975). Antecedent genre as rhetorical constraint. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 61, 406–415.
34.
JanssonC.BointonB., & MarlowN. (2003). An exploratory conjoint analysis study of consumers' aesthetic responses of point-of-purchase materials. International Review of Retail, Distribution, and Consumer Research, 13(1), 59–76.
35.
JanssonC.MarlowN., & BristowM. (2004). The influence of colour on visual search times in cluttered environments. Journal of Marketing Communications, 10, 183–193.
36.
KenneyK. (2004). Building visual communication theory by borrowing from rhetoric. In HandaC. (Ed.), Visual rhetoric in a digital world (pp. 321–343). Boston: Bedford/St. Martin's. (Reprinted from Journal of Visual Literacy, 22(1), 53–80.) Original work published in 2002.
37.
KirschI., & LynnS. J. (1999). Automaticity in clinical psychology. American Psychologist, 54, 504–515.
LauerJ. (1984). Issues in rhetorical invention. In ConnorsR. J.EdeL. S., & LunsfordA. A. (Eds.), Essays on classical rhetoric and modern discourse (pp. 144–151). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
40.
LauerD. A. (1985). Design basics (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
LucasJ., & PrenskyD. (1997). Evaluating the effectiveness of place-based media. In WellsW. D. (Ed.), Measuring advertising effectiveness (pp. 371–384). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
43.
McDougallA., & HamptonV. J. (1990). Picture editing and layout: A guide to better visual communication. Columbia, MO: Viscom Press.
44.
MerrillJ. C., & LowensteinR. L. (1971). Media, messages, and men. New York: David McKay Co., Inc.
45.
MilesM., & HubermanA. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Beverly Hills: Sage.
46.
PeglerM. M. (2006). Visual merchandising and display (5th ed.). New York: Fairchild Publications, Inc.
47.
PerelmanC., & Olbrechts-TytecaL. (1971). The new rhetoric. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
48.
PolackJ. (March 1, 1999). B & W Carlton relaunch first since new ad rules. Advertising Age, 12.
SotoP. (2006). Introduction. In SerratsM. (Ed.), Point of purchase. New York: Collins/Design HarperCollins Publishers.
51.
St. ExuperyA. (1950). The wisdom of the sands. (GilbertS., Trans. from the French Citadelle.) New York: Harcourt Brace.
52.
VasalyA. (1993). Representations: Images of the world in Ciceronian oratory. Berkeley: University of California Press.
53.
VerdonkP. (2005). Painting, poetry, parallelism: Ekphrasis, stylistics and cognitive poetics. Language & Literature, 14(3), 231–244.
54.
WalterE. V. (1988). Placeways: A theory of the human environment. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina University Press.
55.
CrossG. A. (2004). Ethical deliberation and trust in diverse-group collaboration. In CoutureB. & KentT., The private, the public, and the published: Reconciling private lives and public rhetoric. Logan, UT: Utah State University Press.
56.
CrossG. A. (2001). Forming the collective mind: A contextual exploration of large-scale collaborative writing in industry. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
57.
CrossG. A. (1994). Collaboration and conflict: A contextual exploration of group writing and positive emphasis. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
58.
CrossG. A. (1994). Re-contextualizing writing: Roles of written texts in multiple media communications. The Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 8(2), 212–230.
59.
CrossG. A. (1994). Ethnographic research on composition: Between extremes and margins. The Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 8(1), 118–134.
60.
CrossG. A. (1993). The Interrelation of genre, context, and process in the collaborative writing of two corporate documents. In SpilkaR. (Ed.), Writing in the workplace: New research perspectives. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
