Coverage of Team Science by Public Information Officers: Content Analysis of Press Releases about the National Science Foundation Science and Technology Centers
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online April, 2010
Coverage of Team Science by Public Information Officers: Content Analysis of Press Releases about the National Science Foundation Science and Technology Centers
This study examines the content of press releases from the National Science Foundation (NSF) Science and Technology Centers (STCs) to determine how public information officers (PIOs) presented the outcomes of centers to journalists and the public. A total of 68 press releases were analyzed for type of news covered, visibility of centers and their funding agency, extent of inter-institutional cooperation in the issuance of releases, and players covered. Three-quarters of STC releases mentioned the center, but less than half mentioned the NSF STC program and one-quarter didn't mention the center name at all. PIOs covering the STCs mainly issued research-oriented press releases accredited to their own institution. There was a low level of inter-institutional cooperation, with 13% of press releases jointly issued. Compared to research results and institutional news, which together accounted for 82% of the news events, broader activities such as knowledge transfer, diversity enhancement, and education were much less visible.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
TroesterR. and WarburtonT. L., The Technical Communicator As Corporate Spokesperson: A Public Relations Primer, J. Technical Writing and Communication, 31: 3, pp. 241–256, 2001.
2.
NelkinD., Selling Science: How the Press Covers Science and Technology (rev. ed.). W. H. Freeman and Company, New York, 1995.
3.
WeigoldM., Communicating Science: A Review of the Literature, Science Communication, 23: 2, pp. 164–193, 2001.
4.
FriedmanS. M.DunwoodyS., and RogersC. L. (eds.), Scientists and Journalists: Reporting Science as News, Free Press, New York, 1986.
5.
Ben-AriE. T., Making Science News: Public Affairs Practitioners Can Serve as a Vital Link between Scientists and the Public, BioScience, 48: 11, pp. 893–898, 1998.
6.
ReberB. and BergerB., Finding Influence: Examining the Role of Influence in Public Relations Practice, Journal of Communication Management, 10: 3, pp. 235–249, 2006.
7.
DesiereS. and ShaB., Exploring the Development of an Organizational Approach to Media Relations, Public Relations Review, 33, pp. 96–98, 2007.
8.
SallotL. and JohnsonE., Investing Relationship between Journalists and Public Relations Practitioners: Working Together to Set, Frame and Build the Public Agenda, 1991–2004, Public Relations Review, 32, pp. 151–159, 2006.
9.
HallahanK., Seven Models of Framing: Implications for Public Relations, Journal of Public Relations Research, 11: 3, pp. 205–242, 1999.
10.
AllenW., A News Media Perspective on Environmental Communication, BioScience, 51: 4, p. 289. 2001.
11.
CutlipS. M., Third of Newspapers' Content PR-Inspired, Editor & Publisher, 95, p. 68, 1962.
12.
TannerA., Agenda Building, Source Selection, and Health News at Local Television Stations: A Nationwide Survey of Health Reporters, Science Communication, 25, pp. 350–363, 2007.
13.
MartinelliD., Strategic Public Information: Engaging Audiences in Government Agencies' Work, Public Relations Quarterly, 51: 1, pp. 37–41, 2006.
14.
WoloshinS. and SchwartzL., Press Releases: Translating Research Into News, Journal of the American Medical Association, 287, pp. 2856–2858, 2002.
15.
VogelG., A Scientific Result Without Science, Science, 276: 5317, p. 1327, 1997.
16.
TilleryD., The Problem of Nuclear Waste: Ethos and Scientific Evidence in a High-Stakes Public Controversy, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 49: 4, pp. 325–334, December 2006.
17.
GilpinD., Narrating the Organizational Self: Reframing the Role of the News Release, Public Relations Review, 34, pp. 9–18, 2008.
18.
WaltersT. N.WaltersL. M., and StarrD. P., After the Highwayman: Syntax and Successful Placement of Press Releases in Newspapers, Public Relations Review, 20: 4, pp. 345–356, 1994.
19.
MortonL. P., Gatekeepers as Target Publics,”Public Relations Quarterly, pp. 21–24, Summer 1995.
20.
BollingerL., A New Scoring Method for the Press Release, Public Relations Quarterly, pp. 31–35, Spring 2001.
21.
RensbergerB., Covering Science for Newspapers, in A Field Guide for Science Writers, BlumD. and KnudsonM. (eds.), Oxford University Press, New York, p. 7, 1997.
22.
National Science Board, Science and Engineering Indicators2002 (NSB-02-1). Nation Science Foundation Website. [Online] Available: http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind02
23.
WolfeJ., Unpublished Results, 2005, Department of Technical Communication, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195.
24.
RogersC. L., The Practioner in the Middle, in Scientists and Journalists: Reporting Science as News, FriedmanS. M.DunwoodyS., and RogersC. L. (eds.), Free Press, New York, pp. 42–54, 1986.
25.
SuretteR. and RichardA., Public Information Officers: A Descriptive Study of Crime News Gatekeepers, Journal of Criminal Justice, 23: 4, pp. 325–336, 1995.
26.
de SemirV.RibasC., and RevueltaG., Press Releases of Science Journal Articles and Subsequent Newspaper Stories on the Same Topic, Journal of the American Medical Association, 280: 3, pp. 294–295, July 15, 1998.
27.
ClarkF. and IllmanD., A Longitudinal Study of the New York Times Science Times Section, Science Communication, 27: 4, pp. 496–513, 2006.
28.
ClarkF. and IllmanD., Portrayals of Engineers in “Science Times,”IEEE Technology and Society, 25: 1, pp. 12–21, 2006.
29.
AlfonsoG. and MiguelR., Trends in Online Media Relations: Web-Based Corporate Press Rooms in Leading International Companies, Public Relations Review, 32, pp. 267–275, 2006.
30.
SiegelD.WaldmanD.AtwaterL., and LinkA., Toward a Model of the Effective Transfer of Scientific Knowledge from Academicians to Practitioners: Qualitative Evidence from the Commercialization of University Technologies, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 21, pp. 115–142, 2004.
31.
JacobsonN.ButterillD., and GoeringP., Organizational Factors that Influence University-Based Researchers' Engagement in Knowledge Transfer Activities, Science Communication, 25, pp. 246–259, 2004.
32.
HameriA., Technology transfer between basic research and industry, Technovation, 16: 2, pp. 51–57, 1996.
33.
NdonzuauF.PirnayF., and SurlementB., A Stage Model of Academic Spin-Off Creation, Technovation, 22, pp. 281–298, 2002.
34.
RhotenD. and PfirmanS., Women in Interdisciplinary Science: Exploring Preferences and Consequences, Research Policy, 36: 1, pp. 56–75, 2007.
35.
CoppolaN. W., Big Science or Bricolage: An Alternative Model for Research in Technical Communication, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 48: 3, 261–268, September 2005.
36.
BrainardJ., NSF Redefines “Research Center,”The Chronicle of Higher Education, 52: 2, p. 31, 2005.
37.
Centers of Attention: NSF Takes Fresh Look at Their Proliferation, Science, 308: 5724, pp. 943–945, 2005.
38.
BrzakovicD., Centers Program: NSF Perspective and Lessons Learned. National Science Foundation Website. [Online] Accessed July 2006. Available: http://www.nsf.gov/od/oia/presentations/
39.
IllmanD. L. and ClarkF., Visibility of Team Science: A Case Study of Media Coverage of NSF Science and Technology Centers, Science Communication, 30, pp. 48–76, September 2008.
40.
41.
CharneyD., Lone Geniuses in Popular Science: The Devaluation of Scientific Consensus, Written Communication, 20: 3, pp. 215–241, 2003.
42.
CarstenL. D. and IllmanD. L., Perceptions of Accuracy in Science Writing, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 45: 3, pp. 153–156, September 2002.
43.
ClarkF. and IllmanD. L., Dimensions of Civic Science, Science Communication, 23: 1, pp. 5–27, September 2001.
44.
ClarkF. and IllmanD. L., Portrayals of Engineers in “Science Times,”IEEE Technology and Society, 25: 1, pp. 12–21, 2006.
45.
ClarkF. and IllmanD. L., A Longitudinal Study of the New York Times Science Times Section, Science Communication, 27: 4, pp. 496–512, June 2006.
46.
IllmanD. L. and ClarkF., Visibility of Team Science: A Case Study of Media Coverage of NSF Science and Technology Centers, Science Communication, 30: 1, pp. 48–76, September 2008.
