This article analyzes the impact of the design of the Medicare handbook and website on individuals' ability to make effective decisions about prescription drug coverage. The article summarizes Medicare Part D, discusses the characteristics of potential enrollees, and provides an overview of document-based decision making. It uses a rhetorical framework to evaluate the Medicare documents as decision-making tools, arguing that design flaws hinder users'understanding, discourage them from taking appropriate action, and negatively shape perceptions of ethos. The article concludes by discussing implications for functional documents more generally, underscoring the importance of a design cycle that is both user-centered and performance-centered.
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare & You (CMS Publication No. 10050-39), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Baltimore, Maryland, 2006.
3.
Medicare Fact Sheet: The Medicare Prescription Drug Benefit, The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, Menlo Park, California and Washington, DC, 2006.
4.
SalganikM. W., May 15 Deadline Looms on Medicare Drug Plan, Baltimore Sun, April 12, p. 1D, 2006.
5.
Medicare Fact Sheet: The Medicare Prescription Drug Benefit, The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, Menlo Park, California and Washington, DC, 2006.
6.
A Data Book: Healthcare Spending and the Medicare Program, Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPac), Washington, DC, 2006.
Making Your Website Senior Friendly: A Checklist, National Institute on Aging and the National Library of Medicine, Washington, DC, 2002, http://www.nlm.nih.gov/pubs/checklist.pdf
O'HaraK., Curb Cuts on the Information Highway: Older Adults and the Internet, Technical Communication Quarterly, 13: 4, pp. 423–445, 2004.
11.
ChisnellD. E.RedishJ. C., and LeeA., New Heuristics for Understanding Older Adults as Web Users, Technical Communication, 53: 1, pp. 39–59, 2006.
12.
Chadwick-DiasA.McNultyM., and TullisT., Web Usability and Age: How Design Changes Can Improve Performance, in ACM Conference on Universal Usability: Proceedings of the 2003 Conference on Universal Usability, Vancouver, British Columbia, pp. 30–37, 2003.
BoumaH., Document and User Interface Design for Older Citizens, in Information Design and Document Design, JansenC.PenselieR., and WestendorpP. (eds.), Rodopi, Amsterdam/Atlanta, pp. 67–79, 2000.
15.
ParkD. C., Processing of Medical Information in Aging Patients: Cognitive and Human Factors Perspectives, in Processing of Medical Information in Aging Patients: Cognitive and Human Factors Perspectives, ParkD. C.MorrellR. W., and ShifrenK. (eds.), Erlbaum, Mahwah, New Jersey, pp. 3–22, 1999.
16.
HibbardJ. H.SlovicP.PetersE.FinucaneM. L., and TuslerM., Is the Informed-Choice Policy Approach Appropriate for Medicare Beneficiaries?Health Affairs, May/June, pp. 199–203, 2001.
17.
SchwartzB., The Paradox of Choice, ECCO, New York, 2004.
18.
January/February 2006 Health Poll Report Survey: Selected Findings on Seniors' Views of the Medicare Prescription Drug Benefit, The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, Menlo Park, California and Washington, DC, 2006.
19.
YatesJ. F. and PalatanoA. L., Decision Making and Aging, in Processing of Medical Information in Aging Patients: Cognitive and Human Factors Perspectives, ParkD. C.MorrellR. W., and ShifrenK. (eds.), Erlbaum, Mahwah, New Jersey, pp. 31–54, 1999.
20.
Voices of Beneficiaries: Early Experiences with the Medicare Drug Benefit, The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, Menlo Park, California and Washington, DC, 2006.
21.
AskehaveI. and ZethsenK., Communication Barriers in Public Discourse, Document Design, 4: 1, pp. 22–41, 2003.
22.
WrightP., Writing and Information Design of Healthcare Materials, in Writing: Texts, Processes and Practices, CandlinC. and HylandK. (eds.), Addison Wesley Longman, London, pp. 85–98, 1999.
23.
WrightP., Designing Healthcare Advice for the Public, in Handbook of Applied Cognition, DursoF. T. (eds.), John Wiley and Sons Ltd, Chichester, England, pp. 696–723, 1999.
24.
WrightP., The Psychology of Layout: Consequences of the Visual Structure of Documents, in American Association for Artificial Intelligence Technical Report FS-99-04, November 1999, PowerR. and ScottD. (eds.), American Association for Artificial Intelligence, Menlo, California, pp. 1–9, 2000.
25.
KostelnickC. and RobertsD. D., Designing Visual Language: Strategies for Professional Communicators, Allyn and Bacon, Needham Heights, Massachusetts, 1998.
26.
WrightP., Document-Based Decision Making, in Multimedia Learning: Cognitive and Instructional Issues, RouetJ. F.LevonenJ., and BiardeauA. (eds.), Pergamon, Amsterdam, pp. 31–43, 2001.
27.
HartleyJ., What Does It Say? Text Design, Medical Information, and Older Readers, in Processing of Medical Information in Aging Patients: Cognitive and Human Factors Perspectives, ParkD. C.MorrellR. W., and ShifrenK. (eds.), Erlbaum, Mahwah, New Jersey, pp. 233–248, 1999.
28.
Report to the Congress: Increasing the Value of Medicare, Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPac), Washington, DC, 2006.
29.
WrightP., Criteria and Ingredients for Successful Patient Information, Journal of Audiovisual Media in Medicine, 26: 1, pp. 6–10, 2003.
30.
HoadleyJ.HargraveE.CubanskiJ., and NeumanT., The Medicare Drug Benefit: An In-Depth Examination of Formularies and Other Features of Medicare Drug Plans, The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, Menlo Park, California and Washington, DC, 2006.
31.
TaylorD., Toxic Literacies: Exposing the Injustice of Bureaucratic Texts, Heinemann, Portsmouth, New Hampshire, 1996.
32.
SuchanJ., The Effect of High-Impact Writing on Decision Making Within a Public Sector Bureaucracy, Journal of Business Communication, 35: 3, pp. 299–327, 1998.
33.
SchwartzB., Too Many Choices: Why Seniors Won't Sign Up for the Medicare Prescription Drug Plans, Washington Post and NewsweekInteractive Co., November 2005. http://www.slate.com/id/2130932/
34.
PerryM.DulioA., and CubanskiJ., Voices of Beneficiaries: Medicare Part D Insights and Observations One Year Later, The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, Menlo Park, California and Washington, DC, 2006.
35.
BrumbergerEva R., Visual Communication in the Workplace: A Survey of Practice, Technical Communication Quarterly, 16: 4, 2007.
36.
BrumbergerEva R., Making the Strange Familiar: A Pedagogical Exploration of Visual Thinking, Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 21: 4, 2007.
37.
BrumbergerEva R., Visual Rhetoric in the Curriculum: Pedagogy for a Multimodal Workplace, Business Communication Quarterly, 68: 3, 2005.
38.
BrumbergerEva R., The Rhetoric of Typography: Typeface Persona, Reading Comprehension, and Perceptions of Ethos, Technical Communication, 51: 1, 2004.
39.
BrumbergerEva R., The Rhetoric of Typography: The Awareness and Impact of Typeface Appropriateness, Technical Communication, 50: 2, 2003.
40.
BrumbergerEva R., The Rhetoric of Typography: The Persona of Typeface and Text, Technical Communication, 50: 2, 2003.
