Linking Contextual Factors with Rhetorical Pattern Shift: Direct and Indirect Strategies Recommended in English Business Communication Textbooks in China
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online January, 2011
Linking Contextual Factors with Rhetorical Pattern Shift: Direct and Indirect Strategies Recommended in English Business Communication Textbooks in China
Scholars have consistently claimed that rhetorical patterns are culturally bound, and indirectness is a defining characteristic of Chinese writing. Through examining how the rhetorical mechanism of directness and indirectness is presented in 29 English business communication textbooks published in China, we explore how English business communication textbook writers in China keep up with the contextual changes in the Chinese society and how the rhetorical mechanism of directness and indirectness is locally situated in the English business communication teaching practices in China. We conclude that the pedagogical strategy on directness and indirectness represented in Chinese English business communication textbooks echoes the same strategy favored by scholars in the United States.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
MatsudaP. K. and AtkinsonD., A Conversation on Contrastive Rhetoric, in Contrastive Rhetoric: Reaching into Intercultural Rhetoric, ConnorU.NagelhoutE., and RozyckiW. (eds.), John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 277–298, 2008.
2.
KaplanR., Cultural Thought Patterns in Intercultural Education, Language Learning, 16: 1, pp. 1–20, 1966.
3.
BeamerL., Directness in Chinese Business Correspondence of the Nineteenth Century, Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 17: 2, pp. 201–232, 2003.
4.
BarnumC. M. and LiH., Chinese and American Technical Communication: A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Differences, Technical Communication, 53: 2, pp. 143–166, 2006.
5.
OliverR. T., Communication and Culture in Ancient India and China, Syracuse University Press, Syracuse, New York, 1971.
6.
CampbellC. P., A Bridge between High-Context and Low-Context Cultures? in The Cultural Context in Business Communication, MiemeierS.CampbellC. P., and DirvenR. (eds.), John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam, pp. 31–48, 1998.
7.
DingD., An Indirect Style in Business Communication, Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 20: 1, pp. 87–100, 2006.
8.
WangJ., Directness and Indirectness in Chinese and American Business Letters: Moving toward Convergence?Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 24: 1, pp. 91–120, 2010.
9.
BeamerL., Teaching English Business Writing to Chinese-Speaking Business Students, Bulletin of the Association for Business Communication, 57, pp. 12–18, 1994.
10.
ZhuY., Business Communication in China, Nova Science Publishers, New York, 1999.
11.
BrislinR., Understanding Culture's Influence on Behavior, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Fort Worth, Texas, 1993.
12.
TrompenaarsF. and Hampden-TurnerC., Riding the Waves of Culture: Understanding Diversity in Global Business, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1998.
13.
StevensonR. L., Global Communication in the Twenty-first Century, Longman, New York, 1994.
14.
MikelonisV. M., Message Sent versus Message Received: Implications for Designing Training Materials for Central and Eastern Europeans, in Managing Global Communication in Science and Technology, HagerP. and ScheiberH. J. (eds.), John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 205–231, 2000.
15.
EhningerD., On Systems of Rhetoric, in The Rhetoric of Western Thought, GoldenJ. L.BerquistG. F.ColemanW. E., and SprouleJ. M. (eds.), Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company, Dubuque, Iowa, pp. 25–33, 1983.
16.
KennedyG. A., Classical Rhetoric and Its Christian and Secular Tradition from Ancient to Modern Times, The University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 1980.
17.
XianX. and TangW., Re-examining the Curriculum of Business English, Higher Education Exploration, 2, pp. 60–61, 2005.
18.
SuL., Exploring the Development of the Business English Discipline, International Trade and Economics Research, 2, pp. 62–64, 1997.
19.
LongakerM. G., Back to Basics: An Apology for Economism in Technical Writing Scholarship, Technical Communication Quarterly, 15: 1, pp. 9–29, 2006.
20.
ScollonR. and ScollonS., Intercultural Communication: A Discourse Approach, Blackwell, Oxford, England, 1995.
21.
UlijnJ. M., Translating the Culture of Technical Documents: Some Experimental Evidence, in International Dimensions of Technical Communication, AndrewsD. C. (ed.), Society for Technical Communication, Arlington, Virginia, pp. 69–86, 1996.
22.
Blum-KulkaS.HouseJ., and KasperG., Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies, Ablex, Norwood, New Jersey, 1987.
23.
ZhangY., Indirectness in Chinese Requesting, in Pragmatics of Chinese as Native and Target Language, KasperG. (ed.), University of Hawaii, Manoa, pp. 69–118, 1995.
24.
ZhangY., Strategies in Chinese Requesting, in Pragmatics of Chinese as Native and Target Language, KasperG. (ed.), University of Hawaii, Manoa, pp. 23–68, 1995.
25.
LuM., Communicating in International Business, University of International Business & Economics Press, Beijing, China, 1988.
26.
WangC., College English Writing, Hunan Normal University Press, Changsha, China, 1995.
27.
GuoX., Applied English Rhetoric, Jiangsu People's Press, Nanjing, China, 1985.
28.
XuQ. and ZhuC., English Business Correspondence, University of Northeast Press, Shenyang, China, 2000.
29.
FuS., A Practical Writing Course for College Students, Beijing University Press, Beijing, China, 2003.
30.
WangS., A Course in International Business Writing, University of International Business & Economics Press, Beijing, China, 1995.
31.
WeeksF. W., The Teaching of Business Writing at the Collegiate Level 1900–1920, in Studies in the History of Business Writing, DouglasG. H. and HilderbrandtH. W. (eds.), The Association for Business Communication, Urbana, Illinois, pp. 201–215, 1985.
32.
YuB., English Writing, Northwest Polytechnic University Press, Xian, China, 2004.
33.
CaoL., English Business Letters, Foreign Language Teaching & Research Press, Beijing, China, 2000.
34.
YanS., Modern English Business Communications, Beijing, China: University of International Business & Economics Press, Beijing, China, 1998.
35.
LiX., A Guide to Practical Writing, National Defense Industry Press, Beijing, China, 2005.
36.
LiaoY., Practical English for Foreign Trade Communication, Huazhong University of Science & Technology Press, Wuhan, China, 2003.
37.
ZhuJ., Business English Writing, Fudan University Press, Shanghai, China, 2006.
38.
LiX. P., Business English Writing, University of International Business & Economics Press, Beijing, China, 2007.
39.
ZhuG., Business English Letters, University of International Business & Economics Press, Beijing, China, 2000.
40.
GuanC., English Writing for International Business, Zhejiang University Press, Hangzhou, China, 2006.
41.
ZhuG., English Business Communications, University of International Business & Economics Press, Beijing, China, 1983.
42.
GanH., English for International Business Communication, Shanghai Scientific & Technological Literature Press, Shanghai, China, 1990.
43.
PengC.TuS., and LiP., Business English Writing Skills and Practice, Wuhan University Press, Wuhan, China, 2006.
44.
GuffeyM. E., Business Communication: Process & Product (6th ed.). Thomson South-Western, Mason, Ohio, 2008.
45.
KrizanA. C.MerrierP.LoganJ., and WilliamsK. S., Business Communication (7th ed.), Thomson South-Western, Mason, Ohio, 2007.
46.
BovéeC. and ThillJ., Business Communication Essentials (3rd ed.), Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, 2007.
47.
ZhuY., Rhetorical Moves in Chinese Sales Genres, 1949 to the Present, Journal of Business Communication, 37: 2, pp. 156–172, 2000.
48.
ZongB. and HildebrandtH. W., Business Communication in the People's Republic of China, Journal of Business and Communication, 20: 1, pp. 25–32, 1983.
49.
HalpernJ. W., Business Communication in China: A Second Perspective, Journal of Business and Communication, 20: 4, pp. 43–55, 1983.
50.
BhatiaV. K., Analysis Genre: Language Use in Professional Setting, Longman Group UK Limited, New York, 1993.
51.
KincaidD. L., The Convergence Model of Communication, East-West Communication Institute, Honolulu, Hawaii, 1979.
52.
ConnorU., How Like You Our Fish? Accommodation in International Business Communication, in Business English: Research into Practice, HewingsM. and NikersonC. (eds.), Longman, London, pp. 115–123, 1999.
53.
ZhangZ., Towards an Integrated Approach to Teaching Business English: A Chinese Experience, English for Specific Purposes, 26, pp. 399–410, 2007.
54.
FriedmanT. L., The World is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-first Century, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York, 2005.
55.
BeamerL., Learning Intercultural Communication Competence, Journal of Business Communication, 29: 3, pp. 285–303, 1992.
56.
Georgi-FindlayB., American and globalization, in International Perspective in Business Communication: From Past Approaches to Future Trends, SatzgerA. and PonciniG. (eds.), Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Main, pp. 3–16, 2002.
57.
WangJ., Directness and Indirectness in Chinese and American Business Letters: Moving toward Convergence?Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 24: 1, pp. 91–120, 2010.
58.
WangJ., Toward a Critical Perspective of Culture: Contrast or Compare Rhetorics?Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 38: 2, pp. 133–148, 2008.
59.
WangJ. and BaakeK., Offshoring and Serving the Needs of Indian Technical Communicators with Online Technical Communication Programs: A Feasibility Study, Technical Communication, 53: 4, pp. 427–438, 2006.
60.
ZhuP., Language Problems to be Coped with in Web Localization, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 39: 1, pp. 57–78, 2009.
61.
ZhuP. and St. AmantK., Taking Traditional Chinese Medicine International and Online, Technical Communication, 54: 2, pp. 171–186, 2007.
62.
ZhuP., Semantic Problems that Affect International Business, Journal for Global Business Education, 9, pp. 11–20, 2009.
63.
ZhuP., Emphasis within English Sentences, College English, 7, p. 55, 1999 (China).
