This article uses theories of technical communication and archives to advance a pedagogy that includes archival production in the technical communication classroom. By developing and maintaining local classroom archives, students directly engage in valuable processes of appraisal, selection, collaboration, and retention. The anticipated outcomes of this work are the critical practice of making connections, the decentering of the self, the ability to work through noise, and the ability to imagine future users of the archive. The authors conclude that local classroom archives are one new means of meaningful instruction in the technical communication classroom and the local archive concept has great potential for further development.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
DubinskyJ. M., Teaching Technical Communication: Critical Issues for the Classroom, DubinskyJ. M. (Ed.), Bedford/St. Martins, Boston, Massachusetts, pp. 281–282, 2004.
2.
DannelsD. P., Learning to be Professional: Technical Classroom Discourse, Practice and Professional Identity Construction, Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 14: 1, pp. 5–37, 2000.
3.
SchneiderB. and AndreJ., University Preparation for Workplace Writing: An Exploratory Study of the Perceptions of Students in Three Disciplines, Journal of Business Communication, 42: 2, pp. 195–218, 2003.
4.
FreedmanA. and AdamC., Bridging the Gap: University-Based Writing That is More Than Simulation, in Transitions: Writing in Academic and Workplace Settings, DiasP. and PareA. (eds.), Hampton Press, Cresskill, New Jersey, pp. 129–144, 2000.
5.
BlakesleeA. M., Researching a Common Ground: Exploring the Space Where Academic and Workplace Cultures Meet, in Reshaping Technical Communication: New Directions and Challenges for the 21st Century, MirelB. and SpilkaR. (eds.), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, New Jersey, pp. 41–56, 2002.
6.
BosleyD. S., Jumping Off the Ivory Tower: Changing the Academic Perspective, in Reshaping Technical Communication: New Directions and Challenges for the 21st Century, MirelB. and SpilkaR. (eds.), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, New Jersey, pp. 27–40, 2002.
7.
ReitherJ. A., Bridging the Gap: Scenic Motives for Collaborative Writing in Workplace and School, in Writing in the Workplace: New Research Perspectives, SpilkaR. (ed.), Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale, Illinois, pp. 195–206, 1993.
8.
WhitesideA. L., The Skills That Technical Communicators Need: An Investigation of Technical Communication Graduates, Managers, and Curricula, Technical Writing and Communication, 33: 4, pp. 303–318, 2003.
9.
StowersR. H. and BarkerR. T., Improved Student Writing in Business Communication Classes: Strategies for Teaching and Evaluation, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 33: 4, pp. 337–348, 2003.
10.
BarkerR. T. and StowersR. H., The Perception of Communication Related Value-Added Educational Activities: A Survey of Graduate Business Students, Technical Writing and Communication, 37: 3, pp. 347–354, 2007.
11.
MillerC. R., Genre as Social Action, Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70, pp. 151–167, May 1984.
12.
MillerC. R., Rhetorical Community: The Cultural Basis of Genre, in Genre and the New Rhetoric, FreedmanA. and MedwayP. (eds.), Taylor and Francis, Abingdon, United Kingdom, pp. 66–78, 1984.
13.
AdamC., What Do We Learn From the Reader? Factors in Determining Successful Transitions between Academic and Workplace Writing, in Transitions: Writing in Academic and Workplace Settings, DiasP. and PareA. (eds.), Hampton Press, Cresskill, New Jersey, pp. 167–182, 2000.
14.
AdamC. and FreedmanA., Learning to Write Professionally: “Situated Learning” and the Transition from University to Professional Discourse, Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 10: 4, pp. 395–427, 1996.
15.
DerridaJ., Archive Fever: A Freudian Impression, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, 1995.
16.
SteedmanC., Dust: The Archive and Cultural History, Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, New Jersey, 2002.
17.
CoxR. J., Closing an Era: Historical Perspectives on Modern Archives and Records Management, Greenwood Press, Westport, Connecticut, 2000.
18.
HarrisV., The Archival Sliver: Power, Memory and Archives in South Africa, Archival Science, 2: 1–2, pp. 63–86, 2002.
19.
BieseckerB., Of Historicity, Rhetoric: The Archive as Scene of Invention, Rhetoric and Public Affairs, 9: 1, pp. 124–131, 2006.
20.
HedstromM., Archives, Memory, and Interfaces With the Past, Archival Science, 2, pp. 21–43, 2002.
21.
VanderStarreM., This File Cabinet Has No Sex Life: Creating Organizational Knowledge and Visual Identity as a Survival Strategy, Retrieved from http://martavs.com/pages/educn.html
22.
GemmellJ.BellG., and LuederR., My Life Bits: A Personal Database for Everything, Communications of the ACM, 49: 1, pp. 88–95, 2006.
23.
DuderstadtJ., A University for the 21st Century, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 2000.
24.
AnsonC. and Miller-CochranS. K., Contrails of Learning: Using New Technologies for Vertical Knowledge-Building, Computers and Composition, 26, pp. 38–48, 2009.
25.
SpinuzziC., The Methodology of Participatory Design, Technical Communication, 52: 2, pp. 163–174, 2005.
26.
CarterM., The Idea of Expertise: An Exploration of Cognitive and Social Dimensions of Writing, College Composition and Communication, 41: 3, pp. 265–286, October 1990.
27.
SpinuzziC.. Pseudotransactionality, Activity Theory, and Professional Writing Instruction, Technical Communication Quarterly, 5: 3, pp. 295–308, Summer 1996.
28.
SlackJ. D. and WiseJ. M., Culture + Technology: A Primer, Peter Lang, New York, 2005.
29.
SelberS. A. and Johnson-EilolaJ., Plagiarism, Originality, and Assemblage, Computers and Composition, 24, pp. 375–403, 2007.
30.
SchreiberE. J., From Academic Writing to Job-Related Writing: Achieving a Smooth Transition, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 36, pp. 178–184, 1993.
31.
Cargille-CookeK., Layered Literacies: A Theoretical Frame for Technical Communication Pedagogy, Technical Communication Quarterly, 11: 1, pp. 5–29, 2002.
32.
HannahMark A., Legal Literacy: Coproducing the Law in Technical Communication, Technical Communication Quarterly, 20: 1, 5–24, 2011.
33.
SuraT.WellsJ.SchoenM., and DriscollD. L., Praxis and Allies: The WPA Boardgame, WPA: Writing Program Administration, 32: 3, 75–88, 2009.
