This study examines the controversy over alleged cannibalism in the prehistoric American Southwest as it played out in scholarly journals. It also examines the lessons those controversies provide technical communication. Data painstakingly collected from human remains at ancestral Pueblo sites have been interpreted as representing cannibalism and, alternatively, as indicating witchcraft, mutilation of the dead, and warfare. Three focal points of this study are the circular process of developing criteria for analysis in archaeology, the role of analogy in building hypotheses, and the role of gestalt in interpretation of the findings. This study also looks at the ways narratives contribute to knowledge building.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
EckholmE., What Is the Meaning of Cannibalism?New York Times, p. 1, December 9, 1986.
2.
WadeN., Reconsidering Cannibalism: If You Are What You Eat, Mind if I Move to Another Table?New York Times, p. WK3, 2000.
3.
PrestonD., Cannibals of the Canyon: Has a Controversial Anthropologist Uncovered the Truth about a Great Southwestern Civilization?The New Yorker, 74: 37, p. 76(11), 1998.
4.
BillmanB. R.LambertP. M., and LeonardB. L., Cannibalism, Warfare, and Drought in the Mesa Verde Region during the Twelfth Century A.D., American Antiquity, 65: 1, pp. 145–178, 2000.
5.
PotterJ. M. and ChuipkaJ. P., Perimortem Mutilation of Human Remains in an Early Village in the American Southwest: A Case for Ethnic Violence, Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 29, pp. 507–523, 2010.
6.
LallyE. F., Hopi and the Cannibalism Issue: Science and Oral History in Conflict, Anthropology News, 46: 4, pp. 13–15, 2005.
7.
FahnestockJ., Arguing in Different Forums: The Berring Crossover Controversy, in Landmark Essays on Rhetoric of Science: Case Studies, HarrisR. A. (ed.), Hermagoras Press, Mahwah, New Jersey, pp. 53–67, 1997.
8.
RawsonC., Unspeakable Rites: Cultural Reticence and the Cannibal Question, Social Research, 1: 1, pp. 167–193, 1999.
9.
TurnerC. G.II and TurnerJ. A., The First Claim for Cannibalism in the Southwest: Walter Hough's 1901 Discovery at Canyon Butte Ruin 3, Northeastern Arizona, American Antiquity, 57: 4, pp. 661–682, 1992.
10.
TurnerC. G.II and MorrisN. T., A Massacre at Hopi, American Antiquity, 35: 3, pp. 320–331, 1970.
11.
WhiteT. D., Prehistoric Cannibalism at Mancos 5MTUMR-2346, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1992.
12.
TurnerC. G.II and TurnerJ. A., Man Corn: Cannibalism and Violence in the Prehistoric Southwest, University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City, 1999.
13.
MartinD. L., Review of Man Corn: Cannibalism and Violence in the Prehistoric American Southwest by Christy G. Turner II and Jacqueline A. Turner, American Antiquity, 65: 1, pp. 199–201, 2000.
14.
DongoskeK. E.MartinD. L., and FergusonT. J., Critique of the Claim of Cannibalism at Cowboy Wash, American Antiquity, 65: 1, pp. 179–190, 2000.
15.
DarlingJ. A., Mass Inhumation and the Execution of Witches in the American Southwest, American Anthropologist, 100: 3, pp. 732–752, 1998.
16.
TurnerC. G.II, Taphonomic Reconstructions of Human Violence and Cannibalism Based on Mass Burials in the American Southwest, in Carnivores, Human Scavengers & Human Predators: A Question of Bone Technology, LeMoineG. and MacEachernA. (eds.), Archaeological Association, University of Calgary, Calgary, pp. 219–240, 1983.
17.
KantnerJ., Anasazi Mutilation and Cannibalism in the American Southwest, in The Anthropology of Cannibalism, GoldmanL. R. (ed.), Bergin and Garvey, Westport, Connecticut, pp. 74–104, 1999.
18.
BullockP. Y., Review of Prehistoric Cannibalism at Manco 5MTUMR-2346 by Tim D. White, Man, 29: 1, pp. 190–191, 1994.
19.
BullockP. Y., A Reappraisal of Anasazi Cannibalism, Kiva, 57: 1, pp. 5–16, 1991.
20.
NassG. G. and BellatoniN. F., A Prehistoric Multiple Burial from Monument Valley Evidencing Trauma and Possible Cannibalism, Kiva, 47: 4, pp. 257–271, 1982.
21.
FergusonT. J.DongoskeK. E., and KuwanwisiwmaL. J., Hopi Perspectives on Southwestern Mortuary Studies, in Ancient Burial Practices in the Prehistoric Southwest, MitchellD. R. and Brunson-HadleyJ. L. (eds.), University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque, pp. 9–26, 2001.
22.
FergusonT. J., Native Americans and the Practice of Archaeology, Annual Review of Anthropology, 25: 1, pp. 63–79, 1996.
23.
WhiteleyP. M., Archaeology and Oral Tradition: The Scientific Importance of Dialogue, American Antiquity, 67: 3, pp. 405–415, 2002.
24.
LymanR. L., Vertebrate Taphonomy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 1994.
25.
DarlingJ. A., Review of Man Corn: Cannibalism and Violence in the Prehistoric American Southwest by Christy G. Turner II and Jacqueline A. Turner, Latin American Antiquity, 10: 4, pp. 441–442, December 1999.
26.
PattonM. Q., Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.), Sage, Thousand Oaks, California, 2002.
27.
TurnerC. G.II and TurnerJ. A., On Peter Y. Bullock's “A Reappraisal of Cannibalism, Kiva, 58: 2, pp. 189–201, 1992.
28.
DongoskeK. E.YeattsM.AnyonR., and FergusonT., Archaeological Cultures and Cultural Affiliation: Hopi and Zuni Perspectives in the American Southwest, American Antiquity, 62: 4, pp. 600–608, 1997.
29.
CampbellJ. A., Charles Darwin: Rhetorician of Science, in Landmark Essays on Rhetoric of Science: Case Studies, HarrisR. A. (ed.), Hermagoras Press, Mahwah, New Jersey, pp. 3–17, 1997.
30.
YoungbloodS., Balancing the Rhetorical Tension between Right to Know and Security in Risk Communication: Ambiguity and Avoidance, Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 26: 1, pp. 33–62, 2012.
