Recent scholarship on global online courses points to the need to examine the issue of social context in an online global learning environment. To explore global learners' cultural perspectives on the social climate of an online class, we first review the social presence theory—which can be used to examine the social climate in an online classroom, and explain factors that contribute to learners' social presence. Then we report findings of a survey conducted among a group of Chinese business students and discuss specific aspects of an online business communication class which might contribute to enhancing global learners' sense of social presence in an online environment. We conclude the study by explaining the present study's implications for delivering effective online business and technical communication courses with global learners and recommending strategies for increasing global audiences' social presence in an online class created by the instructor and the online community.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersonP.BergmanB.BradleyL.GustafssonM., and MatzeklA., Peer Reviewing across the Atlantic: Patterns and Trends in L1 and L2 Comments Made in an Asynchronous Online Collaborative Learning Exchange between Technical Communication Students in Sweden and in the United States, Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 24: 3, pp. 296–322, 2010.
2.
DuinA. H. and Starke-MeyerringD., Professional Communication in the Learning Marketspace: A Call for Partnering, Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 17, pp. 346–361, 2003.
3.
St. AmantK., Online Education in an Age of Globalization: Foundational Perspectives and Practices for Technical Communication Instructors and Trainers, Technical Communication Quarterly, 16: 1, pp. 13–30, 2007.
4.
SappD., Global Partnerships in Business Communication: An Institutional Collaboration between the United States and Cuba, Business Communication Quarterly, 67: 3, pp. 267–280, 2004.
5.
GrosseC. U., English Business Communication Needs of Mexican Executives in a Distance-Learning Class, Business Communication Quarterly, 67: 1, pp. 7–23, 2004.
6.
ParettiM. C.McNairL., and Holloway-AttawayL., Teaching Technical Communication in an Era of Distributed Work: A Case Study of Collaboration between U.S. and Swedish Students, Technical Communication Quarterly, 16, pp. 327–353, 2007.
7.
Starke-MeyerringD., Meeting the Challenges of Globalization: A Framework for Global Literacies in Professional Communication Programs, Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 19, pp. 468–499, 2005.
8.
Starke-MeyerringD. and AndrewsD., Building a Shared Virtual Learning Culture: An International Classroom Partnership, Business Communication Quarterly, 69: 1, pp. 25–49, 2006.
9.
ZhuY.GareisE.BazzoniJ. O., and RollandD., A Collaborative Online Project between New Zealand and New York, Business Communication Quarterly, 68: 1, pp. 81–96, 2005.
10.
AnawatiD. and CraigA., Behavioral Adaptation within Cross-Cultural Virtual Teams, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 49: 1, pp. 44–56, 2006.
11.
CoppolaN. W.HiltzS. R., and RotterN. G., Building Trust in Virtual Teams, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 47, pp. 95–104, 2004.
12.
ShortJ.WilliamsE., and ChristieB., The Social Psychology of Telecommunications, John Wiley and Sons, London, 1976.
13.
GunawardenaC. N., Social Presence Theory and Implications for Interaction and Collaborative Learning in Computer Conferences, International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 1: 2, pp. 147–166, 1995.
14.
TuC-H., How Chinese Perceive Social Presence: An Examination of the Online Learning Environment, Education Media International, 38: 1, pp. 45–60, 2001.
15.
GunawardenaC. N. and ZittleF. J., Social Presence as a Predictor of Satisfaction within a Computer-Mediated Conferencing Environment, The American Journal of Distance Education, 11: 3, pp. 8–26, 1997.
16.
WinsorD., Learning to do Knowledge Work in Systems of Distributed Cognition, Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 15, pp. 5–28, 2001.
17.
YildizS., Social Presence in the Web-Based Classroom: Implications for Intercultural Communication, Journal of Studies in International Education, 13: 1, pp. 46–65, 2009.
18.
TuC-H., On-Line Learning Migration: From Social Learning Theory to Social Presence Theory in a CMC Environment, Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 23, pp. 27–37, 2000.
19.
WegerifR., The Social Dimension of Asynchronous Learning Networks, Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 2: 1, pp. 34–49, 1998.
20.
ChristophelD., The Relationship among Teacher Immediacy Behaviors, Student Motivation, and Learning, Communication Education, 39, pp. 323–340, 1990.
21.
PerseE. I.BurtonP.KovnerE.LearsM. E., and SenR. J., Predicting Computer-Mediated Communication in a College Class, Communication Research Reports, 9: 2, pp. 161–170, 1992.
22.
DurlakJ. T., A Typology for Interactive Media, in Communication Yearbook 10, McLaughlinM. L. (ed.), Sage, Newbury Park, California, pp. 743–757, 1987.
23.
LippmanA., Imaging and Interactivity, The Media Lab, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1985.
24.
RiceR. E., The New Media: Communication, Research, and Technology, Sage, Beverly Hills, California, 1984.
25.
HollingsheadA. B. and McGrathJ. E., Computer-Assisted Groups: A Critical Review of the Empirical Research, in Team Effectiveness and Decision Making in Organizations, GuzzoR. A. and SalasE. (eds.), Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, California, pp. 45–78, 1995.
26.
WaltherJ. B., Interpersonal Effects in Computer-Mediated Interaction: A Relational perspective, Communication Research, 19: 1, pp. 52–90, 1992.
27.
RossD. N., Electronic Communications: Do Cultural Dimensions Matter?American Business Review, 19: 2, pp. 75–81, 2001.
28.
RichardsonJ. C. and SwanK., Examining Social Presence in Online Courses in Relation to Students' Perceived Learning and Satisfaction, Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7: 1, pp. 68–88, 2003.
29.
EastmondD. V., Adult Distance Study through Computer Conferencing, Distance Education, 15: 1, pp. 129–151, 1993.
30.
WardenC. A.ChenJ. F., and CaskeyD., Cultural Values and Communication Online: Chinese and Southeast Asian Students in a Taiwan International MBA Class, Business Communication Quarterly, 68: 2, pp. 222–232, 2005.
31.
PowellR. G. and HarvilleB., The Effects of Teacher Immediacy and Clarity on Instructional Outcomes: An Intercultural Assessment, Communication Education, 39: 4, pp. 369–379, 1990.
32.
CampbellN., Bringing ESL Students Out of Their Shells: Enhancing Participation through Online Discussion, Business Communication Quarterly, 70: 1, pp. 37–43, 2007.
33.
Benbunan-FichR. and HiltzS., Mediators of the Effectiveness of Online Courses, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 46: 4, pp. 298–312, 2003.
34.
ConawayR.EastonS., and SchmidtW., Strategies for Enhancing Student Interaction and Immediacy in Online Courses, Business Communication Quarterly, 68: 1, pp. 23–35, 2005.
35.
AbdullahM., An Examination of Social Presence Cues in Online Conferences, unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington, 1999.
36.
WangJ., Toward a Critical Perspective of Culture: Contrast or Compare Rhetorics?Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 38: 2, pp. 133–148, 2008.
37.
WangJ., Directness and Indirectness in Chinese and American Business Letters: Moving toward Convergence?Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 24: 1, pp. 91–120, 2010.
38.
WangJ., Expanding the Business Communication Curriculum: Should We Teach Procedures and Instructions?Journal of the Academy of Business Education, 12, 2011.
39.
WangJ. and BaakeK., Offshoring and Serving the Needs of Indian Technical Communicators with Online Technical Communication Programs: A Feasibility Study, Technical Communication, 53: 4, pp. 427–438, 2006.
40.
WangJ. and ZhuP., Linking Contextual Factors with Rhetorical Pattern Shift: Direct and Indirect Strategies Recommended in English Business Communication Textbooks in China, Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 41: 1, 2011.
