Scholars in business and technical communication have continuously made efforts to look for effective teaching approaches for cross-cultural business and technical communication; however, little research has been conducted to study the process by which students develop intercultural competence; fewer studies have been conducted to assess learners' needs for gaining intercultural competence in the globalization age. To assess students' level of intercultural competence and understand whether they are likely to change in response to teaching, I first introduce a two-part framework for teaching and learning intercultural business and technical communication: the DMIS model—Developmental Model of Intercultural Sensitivity, and the related instrument to assess intercultural sensitivity—the Intercultural Development Inventory (IDI). Then I report the results of using the framework to assess and develop students' intercultural competence, and conclude the study by emphasizing the significance of the current empirical research and discuss the framework's limitations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
HammerM. R.BennettM. J., and WisemanR., Measuring Intercultural Sensitivity: The Intercultural Development Inventory, International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 27, pp. 421–443, 2003.
2.
BennettM. J., Towards Ethnorelativism: A Developmental Model of Intercultural Sensitivity, in Education for the Intercultural Experience, PaigeR. M. (ed.), Intercultural Press, Yarmouth, Maine, pp. 21–72, 1993.
3.
BarkerT. and MatveevaN., Teaching Intercultural Communication in a Technical Writing Service Course: Real Instructors' Practices and Suggestions for Textbook Selection, Technical Communication Quarterly, 15(2), pp. 191–214, 2006.
4.
DeVossD.JaskenJ., and HaydenD., Teaching Intracultural and Intercultural Communication: A Critique and Suggested Method, Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 16, pp. 69–94, 2002.
5.
ScottJ. B., Intercultural Rhetoric in the Technical Communication Curriculum: A Review of the Literature, Journal of Rhetoric, Professional Communication and Globalization, 1: 1, pp. 77–90, 2010.
6.
VictorD. A., Advancing Research in International Business Communication, Business Communication Quarterly, 57, pp. 41–42, 1994.
7.
HunsingerR. P., Culture and Cultural Identity in Intercultural Technical Communication, Technical Communication Quarterly, 15: 1, pp. 31–48, 2006.
8.
Starke-MeyerringD., Meeting the Challenges of Globalization: A Framework for Global Literacies in Professional Communication Programs, Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 19, pp. 468–499, 2005.
9.
VarnerI., Teaching Intercultural Management Communication: Where Are We? Where Do We Go?Business Communication Quarterly, 64: 1, pp. 99–111, 2001.
10.
WangJ., Toward a Critical Perspective of Culture: Contrast or Compare Rhetorics?Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 38: 2, pp. 133–148, 2008.
11.
WangJ., Directness and Indirectness in Chinese and American Business Letters: Moving toward Convergence?Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 24: 1, pp. 91–120, 2010.
12.
WangJ. and ZhuP., Linking Contextual Factors with Rhetorical Pattern Shift: Direct and Indirect Strategies Recommended in English Business Communication Textbooks in China, Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 41: 1, pp. 83–107, 2011.
13.
VictorD. A., International Business Communication, HarperCollins, New York, 1992.
14.
BeamerL., Learning Intercultural Communication Competence, Journal of Business Communication, 29: 3, pp. 285–303, 1992.
15.
BennettM. J., A Developmental Approach to Training for Intercultural Sensitivity, International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 10, pp. 179–195, 1986.
16.
KellyG., A Theory of Personality: The Psychology of Personal Constructs, Norton, New York, 1963.
17.
HammerM. R. and BennettM. J., The Intercultural Development Inventory (IDI) Manual, Intercultural Communication Institute, Portland, Oregon, 1998.
HammerM. R., The Intercultural Development Inventory: An Approach for Assessing and Building Intercultural Competence, in Contemporary Leadership and Intercultural Competence: Exploring the Cross-Cultural Dynamics within Organizations, MoodianM. R. (ed.), Sage, Los Angeles, pp. 203–217, 2009.
20.
PedersenP. J., Teaching towards an Ethnorelative Worldview Through Psychology Study Abroad, Intercultural Education, 20(Suppl S1–2), pp. S73–S86, 2009.
21.
HallE. T., Beyond Culture, Anchor Press, Garden City, New York, 1977.
22.
HofstedeG., Culture and Organizations: Software of the Mind, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1997.
23.
SamovarL. S. and PorterR., Intercultural Communication: A Reader, Wadsworth, Belmont, California, 2000.
24.
ScollonR. and ScollonS., Intercultural Communication: A Discourse Approach, Blackwell, Oxford, England, 1995.
25.
BerryJ. W.PoortingaY. H.SegallM. H., and DasenP. R., Cross-Cultural Psychology: Research and Applications, Oxford University Press, New York, 2002.
MorrisM. W. and PengK., Culture and Cause: American and Chinese Attributions for Social and Physical Events, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67: 6, pp. 949–971, 1994.
28.
HoopesD. S., Intercultural Communication Concepts and the Psychology of Intercultural Experience, in Multicultural Education: A Cross-Cultural Training Approach, PuschM. D. (ed.), Intercultural Press, Yarmouth, Maine, 1981.
29.
WangJ., Toward a Critical Perspective of Culture: Contrast or Compare Rhetorics?, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 38: 2, pp. 133–148, 2008.
30.
WangJ., Directness and Indirectness in Chinese and American Business Letters: Moving Toward Convergence?, Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 24: 1, pp. 91–120, 2010.
31.
WangJ., Expanding the Business Communication Curriculum: Should We Teach Procedures and Instructions?, Journal of the Academy of Business Education, 12, 2011.
32.
WangJ., and BaakeK., Offshoring and Serving the Needs of Indian Technical Communicators with Online Technical Communication Programs: A Feasibility Study, Technical Communication, 53: 4, pp. 427–438, 2006.
33.
WangJ., and ZhuP., Linking Contextual Factors with Rhetorical Pattern Shift: Direct and Indirect Strategies Recommended in English Business Communication Textbooks in China, Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 41: 1, 2011.
34.
ZhuP., and WangJ., Cultural Values Carried in International Business Homepages that Fail to Accommodate the Needs of Cross-cultural Audiences. Journal for Global Business Education, 11, pp. 45–60, 2011.
